Posted on 03/06/2015 6:47:07 AM PST by HomerBohn
Islam is a homosexual cult that wants to bring the world into a homosexual, pagan empire. I did a whole video on this:
(Watch video at link)
The Islamic State (ISIS) are a bunch of homosexual, anti-Christian murderers. They are the purest form of the homosexual agenda, and they are just as evil and evil, and anti-Christian, as the reprobate sodomites in the West. There is a recent report that reveals that ISIS officials engage in sodomy with other men in their tents.
According to the report:
In a joint statement released on August 13 2014 two senior United Nations officials spoke out against Isis' "barbaric acts" of sexual violence and "savage rapes" of Iraqi minorities. "We are gravely concerned by continued reports of acts of violence, including sexual violence against women and teenage girls and boys belonging to Iraqi minorities," Zainab Hawa Bangura and Nickolay Mladenov said.
One detail in Arango's story, however, stands out: it is the reference to homosexual sex in an Isis training camp. "He [Barho] said he saw men having sex with other men behind the tents in the desert night."
An interesting article on the homosexual connection with Islam and Islamic history wrote that nowhere in the Quran is homosexuality explicitly condemned:
Until the modern era, there was no word for sodomy in Arabic or Persian. Nor is there any prohibition of it in the Quran. Some make reference to the destruction of the town identified as Sodom of the Old Testament (which is supposed to be the origin of the word sodomy) in the Quran, Surah 15: 73-77 as if it were the source. But it is quite clear that the city was destroyed because its inhabitants refused to offer hospitality to strangers. Where does the prohibition against sodomy come from? The reference is to some hadith, the sayings and acts of the Prophet Muhammad, which the Sunni interpretation of Islam uses to provide a legal basis for legal matters not covered in the Quran.
A recent article by Elyse Semerdjian that dealt with cases brought before the shariah court in Aleppo over a period of 359 years when it was under Ottoman control has turned up four, but only one concerning sodomy against a young man and his mother. The youngster is supposed to have brought men known to be involved in sodomy to his home to the anger of the people of his neighborhood. The two were expelled from their community, a customary punishment for prostitution that had become noticeable enough to disturb the neighbors. Sodomites, on the other hand, were not punished.
The article continues on to describe a very disturbing ritual called "Sema" in which Sufi mystics would surround young boys and stare at them until they fell into a demonic trance:
Some of the Sufis even organized what were known as "sema" during which ceremonies, they would sit in a circle and concentrate on the beautiful young boys in the center, concentrating to such an extent on what they perceived as beauty that they might fall into a trance.
Muhammad, contrary to Scripture, in fact wore the clothes of his child-bride Aisha as a ritual to receive revelation from Allah.
In the Sahih Collection of al-Bukhari, Hadith Number 2442, Chapter 52, Muhammad says:
The revelation does not come to me when I am in the garment of any woman except 'A'isha.
In Sahih al-Bukhari, Hadith Number 3941, the same impostor states:
Do not hurt me with Aisha; for by Allah, the inspiration did not descent on me while I was in the coverings (lihaf) of any of you (women) except Aisha."
In the Sahih collection of Imam Muslim, Hadith Number 4472, one Zaynab Bint Jahsh requests a visit to see Muhammad
while he was with Aisha in (fee) her robe (Mirt) and in the same state that Fatimah found him in."
As we write in our book, For God or For Tyranny, the Quran itself promises boy loving for jihadists in paradise.
The followers of Muhammad consisted of mukhannathun, or cross dressers. It is the same word as mukhannatah, which in Arabic means homosexual.
Daayiee Abdullah, an openly sodomite imam, describes the mukhannathun as,
sort of a male-female, cross-dressing types. They existed. And they also lived or worked in the household of the Prophet. Aisha, one of the Prophet's wives, indicated that there were men who worked in the household. They were mukhannathun. That generally meant that they were not necessarily castrated, but not having an interest in women.
Muhammad not only was a cross-dresser, but he had sodomite friends. So the next time you hear a modern Christian laud himself for having sodomite friends and criticize the church for prohibiting homosexuality, let him know that Jesus wouldn't have sodomite friends, but Muhammad did.
Islam wants to destroy Christianity and replace it with a heretical, pagan, homosexual empire.
Ewwkie. :/
this makes more sense as a plant from the left to draw out nasty remarks than anything resembling the truth. i call BS.
so now how does THIS fit in with the American Left and their love of homosexuality? Hmmmmmm......I never thought I’d end up here.
Women and kids are just a necessary nuisance to make more little sodomite death cult members. Why do you think Liberals and Homosexuals love Islam so much?
‘Homosexuality’ is a modern invention. Indiscriminate use of others (male or female), animals, and objects for sexual self-gratification has been known throughout history.
Forcing slaves and captives to be recipients of the captors’ sexual self-gratification is intended to humiliate, not to express romantic attachment.
So they’re all a bunch of crossdressing trannies? We are at war with She-maleislamists! Their “She-Meat” is infectious and must be eradicated!! Would explain the time i walked into a local arab grocery and heard a goat in the back screaming. Even better, explains why obama loves goat meat so much and why he married “Man”chelle!
Bingo! They “bosom brothers”. Come quickly Jesus!
>”But it is quite clear that the city [Sodom] was destroyed
>because its inhabitants refused to offer hospitality to
>strangers.”
>
>That’s not “quite clear” at all. In fact it’s total BS.
You have to read the Koran in context. Notice particularly the corrupt addition to the Bible narrative in 68-70 that completely changes the story, reinforced with a more recent islamic example in 80-81:
[15.61] So when the messengers came to Lut’s followers,
[15.62] He said: Surely you are an unknown people.
[15.63] They said: Nay, we have come to you with that about which they disputed.
[15.64] And we have come to you with the truth, and we are most surely truthful.
[15.65] Therefore go forth with your followers in a part of the night and yourself follow their rear, and let not any one of you turn round, and go forth whither you are commanded.
[15.66] And We revealed to him this decree, that the roots of these shall be cut off in the morning.
[15.67] And the people of the town came rejoicing.
[15.68] He said: Surely these are my guests, therefore do not disgrace me,
[15.69] And guard against (the punishment of) Allah and do not put me to shame.
[15.70] They said: Have we not forbidden you from (other) people?
[15.71] He said: These are my daughters, if you will do (aught).
[15.72] By your life! they were blindly wandering on in their intoxication.
[15.73] So the rumbling overtook them (while) entering upon the time of sunrise;
[15.74] Thus did We turn it upside down, and rained down upon them stones of what had been decreed.
[15.75] Surely in this are signs for those who examine.
[15.76] And surely it is on a road that still abides.
[15.77] Most surely there is a sign in this for the believers.
[15.78] And the dwellers of the thicket also were most surely unjust.
[15.79] So We inflicted retribution on them, and they are both, indeed, on an open road (still) pursued.
[15.80] And the dwellers of the Rock certainly rejected the messengers;
[15.81] And We gave them Our communications, but they turned aside from them;
[15.82] And they hewed houses in the mountains in security.
[15.83] So the rumbling overtook them in the morning;
[15.84] And what they earned did not avail them.
And that reminded me of a very old joke:
Robin Hood and his merry band of men were riding their horses to the top of a hillock where they overlooked a quaint English village.
Robin, pulling out his sword, shouted, "Let's ride down to yon hamlet, kill all the women and rape the men!"
Little John said, "Robin. Don't you mean we should ride down into yon village, kill all the men and rape the women?"
It was then that a quiet, effeminate voice could be heard saying "Robin Hood's the boss."
Hang out at a Madrassah some time...or spend time with the Sheikhs in Dubai. If you are a man, you will quickly find out that it is not Kansas.
The imams and rulers wish to assuage or mitigate their guilt?
Some make reference to the destruction of the town identified as Sodom of the Old Testament (which is supposed to be the origin of the word sodomy) in the Quran, Surah 15: 73-77 as if it were the source. But it is quite clear that the city was destroyed because its inhabitants refused to offer hospitality to strangers.****
Huh. This author has bought the lie peddled by the sodomites concerning the destruction of Sodom. Jude makes it clear why Sodom was destroyed.
***just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the cities around them, since they in the same way as these indulged in gross immorality and went after strange flesh, are exhibited as an example in undergoing the punishment of eternal fire.*** Jude 1:7
As Dr. Ben Carson pointed out in a very politically incorrect manner the other day, some circumstances can facilitate an easy transition into the habit. Does this explain every case, maybe not, but it is noteworthy.
My theory is an incorporation theory. It’s about incorporating meanness into sex, which furthers a spiritual abuse problem. It is generally said about rape that it is about power more than it is about traditional ideas of sex. This too.
It doesn’t take much with 4 wives to overpopulate the world doing your duty while relieving yourself 99% of the time in other ways.
Lots of “Bacha Bazi” articles posted on FR for reference - http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/bachabazi/index?tab=articles
Eliminate witnesses?
A number of things could be read into vv. 68ff, and in the context it doesn’t sound like that. Even in the Koran’s rendition.
I'm sure you've read that Obama's "nanny" in Indonesia (must have been Muslim) when he was an impressionable little lad was a tranny. I wonder if they played dress-up together.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.