Obama's engagement of Iran has been a secret policy since he took office in 2009 and explains the apparent lack of strategy that he's often accused of. Not only is his policy a break with decades of US foreign policy consensus, it is perhaps the world's gravest concern.
To: Aspenhuskerette
The plan is to normalize relations with Iran and N. Korea before he is out.
Those are just two of his 4th quarter things.
2 posted on
02/12/2015 7:44:28 AM PST by
ifinnegan
To: Aspenhuskerette
Good call.
It’s very likely he has allied himself with the Mullahs in Tehran — and against America.
3 posted on
02/12/2015 7:45:13 AM PST by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: Aspenhuskerette
Long recognized by the U.S. government as the worlds leading sponsor of terrorism, Iran is the planets most dangerous regime, Several years ago when the "Arab Spring" phenomenon was taking place, Obama was speaking up in support of the "democracy" movements which in actuality were takeovers by radical jihadist movements. He was supportive of almost all of them except Iran which was supposedly a truly democratic movement. Obama said nothing and did nothing and Iran's pro democracy movement was squashed by the jihadists.
Thanks Obama for giving the world a new emboldened and more radicalized than ever Iran.
4 posted on
02/12/2015 8:16:20 AM PST by
Perseverando
(In Washington it's common knowledge that Barack Hussein Obama is ineligible to be POTUS.)
To: Aspenhuskerette
The truth is we cant coexist with a metastasizing cancer like a nuclearized Iranian terrorist state. Thats why, in 2010, the Senate voted 99-0 against Obamas wishes for intensified sanctions, which have since been relaxed, and its why theres overwhelming bipartisan support to restore those sanctions negotiation-strengthening effect. Entrusted with safeguarding civilizations future, shouldnt our leaders act while the cancer is operable?Of course they should, but who do you think is Statesman enough to step forward and take the lead?
Perhaps Bibi will be a catalyst, but it needs to be soon with deadlines like March 24th looming in the near future.
5 posted on
02/12/2015 8:40:18 AM PST by
Balata
To: Aspenhuskerette
Until you deal with Saudi Arabia’s funding of terrorism, you can play whack-a-mole indefinitely.
6 posted on
02/12/2015 9:52:35 AM PST by
Wolfie
To: Aspenhuskerette
There is no chance for success for a policy to reach an agreement that yields anything to a state whose only foreign policy is terrorism followed by a threat of missile-delivered nuclear weapons.
9 posted on
02/12/2015 10:08:25 AM PST by
AmericanVictory
(Should we be more like them or they more like we used to be?)
To: Aspenhuskerette
A sad story to be sure, but we can only hope that our government does nothing to intervene. The currrent modus operandi is to spend American lives and American treasure to lose wars in the long term.
11 posted on
02/12/2015 3:08:50 PM PST by
RKBA Democrat
(There is only one party, the uniparty, and corruption is its credo.)
To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume
If youd like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
13 posted on
02/12/2015 6:06:57 PM PST by
SJackson
(“ISIS is now going to regret this … because King Abdullah is not Barack Obama, Rep. Duncan Hunter)
To: Aspenhuskerette; All
“The Other Islamic State We Should Be Most Worried About”,
Washington, DC
Not being sarcastic...
14 posted on
02/12/2015 6:18:11 PM PST by
maine-iac7
(Christian is as Christian does - by their fruits ye shall know them.)
To: Aspenhuskerette
Remember GW Bush’s “Axis of Evil” speech in the aftermath of 9-11-01 listing Iran, Iraq, and North Korea?
Nothing new here.
15 posted on
02/12/2015 7:46:06 PM PST by
lightman
(O Lord, save Thy people and bless Thine inheritance, giving to Thy Church vict'ry o'er Her enemies.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson