Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Winning facebook post by these followers of Christ:

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Pray for these folk; as well as the Supreme Court. Hearts can be changed.

sff

1 posted on 02/10/2015 2:32:58 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
To: SoFloFreeper

Anywhere we can donate to help them raise this homosexual bully fee?


2 posted on 02/10/2015 2:36:02 AM PST by JudyinCanada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

This is preposterous - remedy can be found by choosing another baker.


3 posted on 02/10/2015 2:40:56 AM PST by Principled (Government Slowdown using the budget process!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

There must be some way we the people of Oregon can ammend the Oregon Equality Act to include a religious or conscientious exemption.


4 posted on 02/10/2015 2:44:21 AM PST by weston (As far as I'm concerned, it's Christ or nothing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

They are being discriminated against by the anti-discrimination law for their religious expressions.


8 posted on 02/10/2015 2:56:22 AM PST by savedbygrace (But God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

so we don’t have the freedom of religion now except for muslims who want to grow beards in prisons, got it.


9 posted on 02/10/2015 2:56:47 AM PST by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper
From the Oregon EEOC webpage:

Administrative Hearing

An administrative hearing is similar to a court hearing and the decision of the administrative law judge has the same weight as a judge´s decision.

If the finding of the administrative hearing is in your favor, the Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor and Industries issues a final order and specifies a remedy.

A remedy is an award of money or a command to the respondent to compensate you for the effects of an unlawful practice.

In cases of discrimination in employment, potential remedies include employment or reemployment, back pay or other benefits lost due to the discriminatory practice, out-of-pocket expenses having to do with the discriminatory practice and compensation for emotional distress.

In cases of discrimination in housing or in places of public accommodation, remedies may include the rental, lease, or sale of real property, the provision of services, out-of-pocket expenses or benefits lost because of the discriminatory practice and compensation for emotional distress.

If, during the processing of a complaint, the division finds that the respondent made a settlement offer that provides an effective remedy to the unlawful practice, the division will tell you about the offer. If you do not accept it, the division will close the complaint.

In cases where a complaint has been dual-filed with the EEOC, the EEOC determines whether the offer constitutes a full settlement of the federal charge.

IOW, a K-Court of leftist radicals stand ready to relieve Oregonians of their God-given rights.

Get used to it.

10 posted on 02/10/2015 2:58:55 AM PST by Jacquerie (Article V. If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

Shoulda baked one.
Substitute salt for sugar.
Ex-Lax for chocolate.


12 posted on 02/10/2015 3:00:22 AM PST by Flintlock (Soapbox didn't work; ballot box neither--we're left with the BULLET BOX.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper
Other societies had people's courts.


15 posted on 02/10/2015 3:07:35 AM PST by Jacquerie (Article V. If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

I think I’d go “Teach English” in China, Korea or Vietnam for several years and let the State of Oregon stew in their own juices.


18 posted on 02/10/2015 3:13:59 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (The question isn't who is going to let me; it's who is going to stop me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

We continue to see the sodomites gaining power over the rest of us. What does the future hold when queers have access to children and strangers just as they did in ancient sodom and Rome? Imagine, some pompous pig in a blackrobe pronouncing a fine of $150000 for not making a piece of pastry.


20 posted on 02/10/2015 3:19:20 AM PST by Neoliberalnot (Marxism works well only with the uneducated and the unarmed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

They should have made the cake, shoddily, then dropped it on the floor immediately prior to delivery. Accidents happen after all. lesson learned.


23 posted on 02/10/2015 3:26:32 AM PST by RC one (Militarized law enforcement is just a politically correct way of saying martial law enforcement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

“If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so.”
- attributed to Thomas Jefferson

“An unjust law is no law at all”
– Martin Luther King


24 posted on 02/10/2015 3:26:50 AM PST by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

Sexually and emotionally disordered tyrants to Christian bakers: “If you don’t give us what we want, and worse, make us feel bad about ourselves in any way, we’ll DESTROY YOU and receive pleasure from your suffering!”


25 posted on 02/10/2015 3:28:32 AM PST by spirited irish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper
From Wikipedia...

I would think this falls under the same rule...

Freedom of association

Further information: Freedom of association

Although the First Amendment does not explicitly mention freedom of association, the Supreme Court ruled, in National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama (1958),[226][227] that this freedom was protected by the Amendment and that privacy of membership was an essential part of this freedom.[228] The U.S. Supreme Court decided in Roberts v. United States Jaycees (1984) that "implicit in the right to engage in activities protected by the First Amendment" is "a corresponding right to associate with others in pursuit of a wide variety of political, social, economic, educational, religious, and cultural ends."[229] In Roberts the Court held that associations may not exclude people for reasons unrelated to the group's expression, such as gender.[230]

However, in Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Group of Boston (1995),[231] the Court ruled that a group may exclude people from membership if their presence would affect the group's ability to advocate a particular point of view.[232] Likewise, in Boy Scouts of America v. Dale (2000),[233] the Court ruled that a New Jersey law, which forced the Boy Scouts of America to admit an openly gay member, to be an unconstitutional abridgment of the Boy Scouts' right to free association.[234]

27 posted on 02/10/2015 3:31:02 AM PST by WVKayaker (Impeachment is the Constitution's answer for a derelict, incompetent president! -Sarah Palin 7/26/14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

Reminds me of the fines, taxes and punishments visited upon Boston in 1770....
...’A Line In The Sand’, if you ask me


28 posted on 02/10/2015 3:32:12 AM PST by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

Seems like the 13th Amendment specifically addresses this situation, specifically:

Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

Of course, given all the numbskulls in the judiciary these days, it is an open question whether the Constitution applies at all to Libtards and their socialist agenda.

30 posted on 02/10/2015 3:42:14 AM PST by Zakeet (Obama: fail ... deny ... blame ... golf ... distract ... lie ... repeat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

According to the feds, bakers must make cakes any way customers demand it. That means if Nazis want cakes decorated with swastikas, Jewish-owned bakeries must bake them that way. Klan cakes with decorations of blacks being hanged must also be baked by black-owned bakeries. No exceptions.


31 posted on 02/10/2015 3:42:53 AM PST by driftless2 (For long term happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

Should have just made them an Ex-Lax chocolate cake...

Would have ruined their wedding night!


32 posted on 02/10/2015 3:51:01 AM PST by tired&retired
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

Find an islamic-owned restaurant and ask them to cater an Easter party with ham, bacon and pulled pork.

If they refuse, go to this same agency and sue them.


33 posted on 02/10/2015 3:53:55 AM PST by Erik Latranyi (Walker/Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

What happens if/when the bakers refuse to pay the fine? Jail time? What then happens when the bakers refuse to submit to go to jail for not baking a gay cake? Do they get killed if swat is then sent out? All because they choose to not ‘celebrate’ and partake in other’s sinful behavior?


34 posted on 02/10/2015 3:57:38 AM PST by Carthego delenda est
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson