Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fox News Megyn Kelly Admits When It Comes To Vaccines: Some Things Require ‘Big Brother’
Youtube ^ | 2/2/15

Posted on 02/03/2015 9:05:39 AM PST by Enlightened1

As a mother of three, Kelly wanted to make sure to go “on the record” and state that she “vaccinated all of them. on time as the doctor prescribed.” She said she sympathized with parents who have been “given bad information” about vaccines supposedly causing autism and other problems. “Now there is good information,” she said, calling the science “certain” on the issues and saying she does not oppose mandatory vaccinations for children

(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: billoreilly; foxnews; megynkelly
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
To: Amendment10
I despise totalitarian regimes...and those who run them. Your Thomas Jefferson quote could apply to any of the following. Glad it is not law (yet)...

1. Force abortions (too many kids in a state of Emergency)
2. Forced sterilizations (too many kids in a state of emergency)
3. Seizure of property, citizens, bank accounts

61 posted on 02/03/2015 10:54:27 AM PST by Jan_Sobieski (Sanctification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Ask her or any progressive: why not favor letting the UN enforce it?

This answer will come back: would like that, but there’s no authority in the Constitution for that.

Reply: It’s not in the Constitution either. Read the 10th Amendment. Then, if you want a vaccine-required state, move to one.

But the will to allow families, counties, and states to make nearly all decisions no longer exists in the West. It requires a faith in God’s will, a faith now lost to the faith in larger and larger oligarchic government.


62 posted on 02/03/2015 11:10:03 AM PST by ReaganGeneration2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jan_Sobieski

No one is touching whether all should be vaccinated, starting with the undocumented.


63 posted on 02/03/2015 11:10:37 AM PST by JmyBryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Jan_Sobieski

Being Christian doesn’t seem to be relevant

Being educated is another matter. perhaps miseducated is a better descriptive.

The same battle was fought decades ago over fluoridation with the result the population has better teeth with which to withstand the rigors of advancing age

Obama results from the sanctimonious self righteous deciding their selfish view was what was best for America and not voting


64 posted on 02/03/2015 11:29:08 AM PST by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12, 73, ..... Obama is public enemy #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Jan_Sobieski; All

Although I won’t deny that immunization is not an exact science, I respectfully disagree that requiring parents to get their kids immunized to help stop the outbreak of a disease is the same type of things that you listed.

65 posted on 02/03/2015 11:33:52 AM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Amendment10

Having admitted they can violate constitutional rights for one health crisis why not another one?

And of course, if you were to permit guns to remain in homes with chilren those children must necessarily be excluded from school. After all, they might take one of daddy’s guns to school and harm someone. So exclude them all. The parents still have a constitutional right to keep their guns but it’s ‘too much’ to allow their children to attend public gatherings. And we’d better ask the whole family to wear yellow gun decals. Just so we know who the really dangerous people are.

After all, guns kill people.

Because we’ve never ever caught the CDC making up gun safety stats. Never.


66 posted on 02/03/2015 11:38:34 AM PST by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Hmmm


67 posted on 02/03/2015 11:43:06 AM PST by StoneWall Brigade (Daniel 2 Daniel 7 Daniel 9 Revelation 13 Revelation 16 Revelation 17 Revelation 18 Revelation 19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert
I say I have studied, you say I am miseducated. Your analogy does not work...I have a choice not to drink fluoridated water. Problem solved! Give me the choice to study and choose what is best for my child.

I ask you the same question I ask others...does the state own the child?

Example: A God fearing Christian, conservative, gun owning, freedom loving, small government, family does research and finds that there is concern about a particular vaccine at a particular age. In your universe, they are criminals for choosing to postpone the vaccine until the child is older!

Honestly, I thank God that people like you are not in control (yet)...
68 posted on 02/03/2015 11:44:53 AM PST by Jan_Sobieski (Sanctification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Amendment10

I ask you the same question I ask others...does the state own the child?

Example: A God fearing Christian, conservative, gun owning, freedom loving, small government, family does research and finds that there is concern about a particular vaccine at a particular age. Are they criminals for choosing to postpone the vaccine until the child is older?


69 posted on 02/03/2015 11:47:28 AM PST by Jan_Sobieski (Sanctification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: bert

Interesting view of freedom you have there.

We held off on further vaccines for my daughter after she suffered a vaccine injury. My sons still got the ones we considered essential - polio, MMR, whooping cough. we skipped chicken pox, hep B and gardisil. None have had a flu shot. As a parent I reserve the right to decide what goes into my kids arm.

I believe vaccines to be effective, but I don’t agree with forcing them on anyone.


70 posted on 02/03/2015 12:04:07 PM PST by JTHomes (Government is force.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: thefactor

No it is the walking bombshell who is only good for one thing that is wearing the tinfoil hat.


71 posted on 02/03/2015 1:02:33 PM PST by Sam Gamgee (May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. - Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

Why not. Call it as he sees it.


72 posted on 02/03/2015 1:03:25 PM PST by Sam Gamgee (May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. - Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: centurion316
Yes, and I remember Governor Perry trying to vaccinate Texas teens on Gardisil for kickbacks from drug companies.
73 posted on 02/03/2015 1:04:34 PM PST by Sam Gamgee (May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. - Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Sam Gamgee

Do you remember the Doctor who fraudulently linked the MMR vaccine to autism so that he could cash in with a competitor vaccine?


74 posted on 02/03/2015 1:07:13 PM PST by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1; Jan_Sobieski; Black Agnes; Oldpuppymax; All

This thread reflects the same thing that got Terri Schiavo into trouble imo. More specifically, since the states have never amended the Constitution to expressly protect people like Terri, or to protect kids from getting vaccinated regardless what parents want, the states are free to “pull the plug” after due process, and also to force kids to get vaccines unless voters work with their state lawmakers to make laws which protect people from the state. And I suspect that voters haven’t worked with state lawmakers for such protections in most if not all states.

Again, I would side with the states to get kids vaccinated, problems with vaccines arguably the lesser of two evils with respect to a possibly greater number of kids alternatively being injured or dying from the outbreak of a nasty disease.


75 posted on 02/03/2015 1:11:36 PM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Future Snake Eater

In what way was your child harmed?


76 posted on 02/03/2015 1:17:33 PM PST by FredZarguna (O, Reason not the need.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Amendment10

Vaccinated against what? How many doses?

The vaccine schedule that worked in the 1970’s has tripled since then. Most of that since the manufacturers were indemnified in 1986.

Would you vaccinate against everything you could? Including things not transmitted casual contact-wise?

Would you let you kids be vaccinated with an experimental HIV vaccine? Would you mandate others do the same?

I’m just trying to find out if there’s a medical due process line you would draw for the state with your children or anyone elses for that matter?

And my gun control rant stands. Once you allow them to violate your constitutional rights in the name of public safety in the absence of immediate risk you can’t whine when they continue to do so. After all, guns kill. Hopefully you’re not so anti science to maintain that guns don’t, in fact, kill?


77 posted on 02/03/2015 1:19:41 PM PST by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Sam Gamgee

Your blatant sexism notwithstanding (towards a woman who is more successful than you could ever dream to be), you provide zero evidence for your argument. So, kindly zip it.


78 posted on 02/03/2015 1:28:48 PM PST by thefactor (yes, as a matter of fact, i DID only read the excerpt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Black Agnes; All
"Would you vaccinate against everything you could?"

Thank you for your patience with this discussion Black Agnes.

In my previous post I indicated state-mandated vaccination with respect to the outbreak of a disease as opposed to getting vaccinated as a precautionary measure.

79 posted on 02/03/2015 1:31:37 PM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1
So what?

If you ask any toxicologist, he will tell you the fundamental law of toxicology is: "the dosage makes the poison."

There are micrograms of some of those substances [including fecal material] just in the air you breathe. Most vaccines no longer contain thimerosal. Those that do contain a microgram or less of mercury. Simply listing a bunch of things that are used as ingredients or in culturing vaccines means absolutely nothing.

80 posted on 02/03/2015 1:31:44 PM PST by FredZarguna (O, Reason not the need.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson