"1. Force abortions (too many kids in a state of Emergency)
2. Forced sterilizations (too many kids in a state of emergency)
3. Seizure of property, citizens, bank accounts"
Although I won’t deny that immunization is not an exact science, I respectfully disagree that requiring parents to get their kids immunized to help stop the outbreak of a disease is the same type of things that you listed.
Having admitted they can violate constitutional rights for one health crisis why not another one?
And of course, if you were to permit guns to remain in homes with chilren those children must necessarily be excluded from school. After all, they might take one of daddy’s guns to school and harm someone. So exclude them all. The parents still have a constitutional right to keep their guns but it’s ‘too much’ to allow their children to attend public gatherings. And we’d better ask the whole family to wear yellow gun decals. Just so we know who the really dangerous people are.
After all, guns kill people.
Because we’ve never ever caught the CDC making up gun safety stats. Never.
I ask you the same question I ask others...does the state own the child?
Example: A God fearing Christian, conservative, gun owning, freedom loving, small government, family does research and finds that there is concern about a particular vaccine at a particular age. Are they criminals for choosing to postpone the vaccine until the child is older?