Posted on 01/17/2015 11:34:04 AM PST by Impala64ssa
While appearing on MSNBC's "All In with Chris Hayes," Rep. Barbara Lee, D-Calif., said the Obama administration was correct in refusing to refer to Islamic terrorists as "Islamic extremists," the Washington Free Beacon reported Thursday. The reason, she explained, is that doing so would anger them and possibly cause them to engage in even more terrorism.
"Theyre responsible for ensuring our national security. We have to be careful in our language and how we I dont want to see any more anger and hostility or violence in the world," she said. "Our response to terrorism is a response that makes us safer that begins to dismantle and degrade terrorist organizations, not create more havoc, anger, and hostility in the world.
Apparently, that means not saying anything that might hurt their feelings or make them angry. The Free Beacon noted that the administration's "acquiescence" on calling Islamic terror what it is has been the subject of hot debate over the last week. "The catered response signals a fear of ISIS, Al Qaeda, and their extremist allies," the Free Beacon said.
Not concerned with the feelings of those who support the recent attacks against the satirical publication Charlie Hebdo, France has strongly responded in both words and action. French Prime Minister Manuel Valls, for example, said France is at war with radical Islam, jihadism and "against everything that is aimed at breaking fraternity, freedom, solidarity."
"We are not a collection of communities, we are one nation, a Republic with values: generosity, solidarity, fraternity, secularism," he added. "We must also be lucid: antisemitism, racism, hatred of the other, these things are intolerable... Journalists were killed for drawing, police were killed for protecting us, and Jews were killed because they were Jewish. This is what is intolerable.
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
Truth hurts eh?
They’re not Islamic extremists. They’re just plain islamics ( moslems) following their koran. Killing or subjugating infidels. All around the world.
Barbara Blockhead doesn’t like being called “senator.” [I don’t like calling her senator, either.] Instead, she wants to called “ma’am.” Watched the slimy b**** berate senior military officers about her title during a hearing. She can’t retire fast enough.
And, Babs, cutting heads off does not make you angry? How about we trade the next victim for Obummer? A win solution all around.
But muslim-loving lefties have no problem with throwing epithets at conservatives. They certainly don’t have to worry about being beheaded by “teabaggers”.
I wonder what General Patton would call them?
CORPSES!
Guess what, Babs, they’re going to be angry no matter what we do.
That cartoon is chilling... and it’s not just true for Britain.
What is the problem? They proudly call themselves Muslims acting in the name of Allah when they committee terrorist acts. Why Obama’s regime disrespects them denying that they are Muslims when those terrorists follow the Koran and the teachings of Mohammed?
Islam: The Awful Truth
By Justin O. Smith
American Thinker
October 4, 2014
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3211166/posts
Islam is violent and repressive, and its sacred texts are the heart of darkness at the center of the Islamic State’s inspiration and motivation, despite Barack Obama’s assertions in September 10th’s address to the nation that the Islamic State “is not Islamic” and that “no religion condones the killing of innocents.” Violence is an integral part of Islamic doctrine, following the example set by its Prophet Mohammed, and in the name of Islam and Allah, Muslims have been murdering innocents, since 656 AD.
If you hate filled teabaggers were smarter, you’d already know that!
Too bad Spike Jones isn’t around today too do something similar to his “In der furor’s face”. Seriously, have any of these Islamic apologists read what Muslims say about us??
Liberal appeasers...the real Islamaphobes
kow towing to the barbarians demands is translated, to them, as weakness.
The have nothing but scorn for weakness.
They cower in the face of strength -
They’re ‘offended’ if someone calls them ‘Islamic Terrorists?”
I’m offended by their cutting off heads of non-Islamics.
WE have some simple but most effective ‘weapons’ at hand. Let it be known that our ammunition is dipped in pigs blood.
Why be afraid of ‘offending’ barbarians?
You wouldn’t find many Islamic barbarians fighting against troops armed with such ammuntition.
I doubt it. I mean it’s amazing how plenty of people realize that not all Muslims take offense to Achmed. Or how rediculous plenty of these politicians are about Islam when readily mocking others.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.