Posted on 01/04/2015 7:32:51 AM PST by maggief
On the surface, this sex scandal involving Prince Andrew, second in the line of succession to the British crown, famed constitutional lawyer Alan Derschowitz, and former President Bill Clinton, would appear too bizarre to be true.
But in a civil suit filed this past week in Florida, alleging that billionaire Jeffrey Epstein received special treatment from the government in a child sexual abuse case in 2008 in which Epstein served only 13 months in jail while avoiding far more serious charges, all three celebrities were named as persons having sex with underage girls at Epstein's estate on his Carribean island.
(snip)
Where does Bill Clinton come in? He has been friends with Epstein for years and flight logs show he took several trips to Epstein's island estate where the pedophile kept several underage girls as sex slaves.
'I remember asking Jeffrey what's Bill Clinton doing here kind fo thing, and he laughed it off and said well he owes me a favor,' one unidentified woman said in the lawsuit, which was filed in Palm Beach Circuit Court.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
The first of the royals for whom the females fall in line consistent with their order of birth has yet to be born.
In your hypothetical, were Andrew unfit to shepherd the young king, it would likely fall next to Edward, the forgotten prince...
Where was Hillary during all of this? Inquiring minds want to know, in light of an upcoming election which could put Bill and Hil back on top.
Everyone is forgetting Princess Ann, the succession was changed IIRC in case George was a girl. Ann would be ahead of Andrew in the line for the throne and could be appointed Regent if the infant George suddenly became King. Andrew is now way down the list.
Sounds like a good way to wind up dead.
SOVEREIGN
1. The Prince of Wales
2. The Duke of Cambridge
3. Prince George of Cambridge
4. Prince Henry of Wales
5. The Duke of York
6. Princess Beatrice of York
7. Princess Eugenie of York
8. The Earl of Wessex
9. Viscount Severn
10. The Lady Louise Mountbatten-Windsor
http://www.royal.gov.uk/ThecurrentRoyalFamily/Successionandprecedence/Succession/Overview.aspx
Anne doesn’t make the top ten! The list changes with births up the list.
You shouldn’t call a girl below the age of consent a whore. She was supposed to be protected by her parents and the law.
The great "journalists" of the MSM will keep having stories about Sarah Palin's dog, or something about the Kardashian's buying something, or showing their butt to the entire world, or some other meaningless nonsense.
Just the fact that Clinton's name comes up means this story will be buried.
Ohhh myyyyy. Dershowitz I was planning to give some benefit of the doubt to. I bought the divorced Prince and old horn dog Clinton right away. And Dershowitz came out with his vehement denials and disbarment threats.
But until your quotes, I didn’t know the details. She remembers many times with him, on board many airplanes?? And there may be video? And Dershowitz refuses to be deposed?? Another Cosby? I think people would be way more shocked that America’s Attorney didn’t think much of the laws protecting underaged girls than that clinton did the same. Or that a weenie Royal would partake and also be lousy in the sack.
However, we need to hang Bill’s involvement right around Hillary’s wrinkly neck.
Thanks..... I wondered how that pos Epstein got off so easy
No. Princess Ann is actually way down on the list of succession- 11th and soon to be 12th. The line falls to the Queen’s direct prodigy through her sons first, and then to their children, her grandchildren in rank from the eldest on down. Her youngest son, Prince Edward and his two children would come before Ann.
Exactly whatwas herage? I did not see it in the article. I DID look up FL law and it said below 16 OR 17 years of age is below the age of consent. So which is it? If I can’t call her a whore, a slut or a trollop, why aren’t her parents (if she has any) in jail also?
In the original story, the complainant, Roberts, said she never considered leaving. She liked the money and was in awe of the celebrities and lifestyle.
But she was underage. Jailbait is jailbait even if she’s willing.
[[ he said to Politico. “I’m also challenging the young woman and the lawyers to level those charges against me outside of the courtroom, so that I can sue them for defamation.]]
Yup- He’s guilty, but wants them to do something stupid so that he can take the focus off himself, and put onto a coutner charge- sounds pretty desperate to me-
[[ Finally, I’m challenging the woman to file criminal charges against me because the filing of false criminal charges is a crime.”]]
As big a crime as being a pedophile rapist?
RIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHTTTTTTT......because these elites never have ANY way to retaliate. Why, they are just perfectly powerless. Utter pushovers. Hell, I bet you could just waltz in to George Soros' house any time you want and give him a piece of your mind, boy howdy.
Ask the 1,400 children of Rotherham about that. The cops and the local politicians actively helped the Muslim rape gang. Parents were arrested for trying to get their kids back from the rapists!
Don't you think the same privileges are given to royalty and celebrities?
just like they voted in obola by NOT voting or voting third party....
votes have consequences for a very long, long time...
Monica Lewinski is just the intern we know of. How many were never named? Sexual perversion is so common among the elites.
Don’t forget that Belgian pedophile ring that went up to the EU, but wasn’t pursued. It’s the devil’s world.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.