NYT trying to distract attention from the cop murders on Obola’s doorstep.
Angry editorial?
I’d say they were angry that they have been caught having complicity with the murder of the two NYPD cops.
I have no love for either of those gentlemen, but I’ll stand armed guard at their house to make sure this doesn’t happen.
And yet that editor loves Al Zawari
Through irresponsible reporting and editorial hate speech they've indirectly caused many times more American deaths than Dick Cheney has in their most fevered marxist dreams.
They’re so cute.
NYC grows more disgusting by the minute!
Traitors advocating criminal charges against those defending America.
Long past due for some “enhanced intrrogation” of the NYT...
It’s the New York Times perpetrating upon our society a typical New York Times Leftist tactic. It’s a tactic. It’s what Leftists do all the time. This tactic is in support of their Leftist buddies of the Democrat party.
Basically they are saying Democrats don’t torture people, and Republicans do. It’s a simple message they are trying to pound into the brains of the American voters who just tossed the Democrats out of office. It’s a tactic in a war for minds, and souls. IOW it’s Leftist Bullshit just like the torture report released by the Democrat Party after the election. They are fighting back trying to make us wish we hadn’t tossed their butts on the street.
I for one am sitting back watching all of it with amusement.
As Dick Cheney said : “I have little respect for the United Nations, or for this individual, who doesn’t have a clue and had absolutely no responsibility for safeguarding this nation and going after the bastards that killed 3,000 Americans on 9/11.”
This, I believes would apply to the NY Times also.
These people know no shame.
BTW, on another issues, I think all the editorial boards calling for voting rights to non-citizens ought to first give editorial voting rights to non-staff members, specifically FREE REPUBLIC POSTERS.
And the reason that this will never happen? Imagine a government system where you prosecute your predecessors. In a two party system it would pretty much guarantee that you, in your turn, would be prosecuted with the only chance of stopping it being to establish a dictatorship. That would have a high % chance of provoking a revolution which you could lose (under the blade of a guillotine!)
Is the NY Times still being published? Why?
We need to prosecute those we have in office now
feh...
...is the only torture *I* care about!
If yellow journalism were prosecutable then the NY Times editorial board would be swinging from high trees n