Posted on 12/22/2014 9:14:43 AM PST by Hostage
Edited on 12/22/2014 9:20:27 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
WASHINGTON (AP) - A federal judge seems skeptical of a lawsuit that seeks to halt President Barack Obama's immigration plan to spare nearly 5 million people from deportation.
U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell heard arguments Monday in a case brought by an Arizona sheriff who claims the program will let more illegal immigrants enter the country and commit crimes, burdening law enforcement.
(Excerpt) Read more at myfoxatlanta.com ...
Yep, this Obama Communist fast tracked the case so to dismiss it.
She will eat alive any conservative that appears before her.
Sheriff Joe will be lucky she doesn't go after the veins in his neck.
Leni
I believe that is why we have appeals courts
No one, not even Laz, would hit that
BTTT.
Very good. We can only hope it succeeds.
I hope Klayman files an appeal because his argument for standing is very strong as can be seen in the post #4 link. Any judge who follows the law will grant standing. The links in post #1 have Obama’s response which is very weak in everything including standing.
Obama’s approach is so disengenuous which shouldn’t surprise anyone. His lawyers claim his executive amnesty action is just policy or politics and not law. So because his actions are not grounded in law and are just matters of discretion, no one is allowed to sue him. Klayman and Abbott both demolish this argument of ‘discretion’.
So it’s clear why Obama did not sign an executive order because doing so would put him on the hook legally.
I’m skeptical anybody/ thing can stop him and all the bureaucrats on anything. The country is dysfunctional in case no one noticed.
If illegal aliens, the president and federal judges don’t have to obey the law, why do any of the rest of us?
That is what I though the PA District Court decided?
Another liberal female .
Cut the hair and it’s a man.
I like your idea. Use their rules against them.
I am a supporter of Sheriff Joe and his willingness to stand up against this de facto amnesty. However, as a state empowered official he has zero legal authority when it comes to federal property. Please remember that the federal government is still a separate sovereign from the state of Arizona.
Nowhere in “Kelo” does it give the “state” the authority to seize federal property through eminent domain.
If an elected sheriff in a state with an immigration problem doesn’t have standing to sue for relief then who the bleep WOULD have standing? The sheriff could demonstrate his lack of standing by rosd-blocking and arresting every Feral bleephole who tries to move in his county. And I’ll send him another contribution to help finance the effort.
re: #4, #6
Thanks
Worse. She’s an Obama appointee. Now that Zero and Reid have packed the courts by exercising the “nuclear option” that Senate Republicrats were too timid to use when they were nominally in charge, this is what we can expect from here in.
LOL
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.