Posted on 12/06/2014 7:23:46 AM PST by HomerBohn
The federal government has 31.2 million acres of Utah's land, and Utah wants it back.
According to the Washington Times on Wednesday, in three weeks, Utah plans to seize control of its own land now under the control of the federal government. Utah Gov. Gary Herbert, in an unprecedented challenge to federal dominance of Western state lands, in 2012 signed the Transfer of Public Lands Act, which demands that Washington relinquish its hold on the land. The land being held represents more than half of the states 54.3 million acres, by Dec. 31.
State Rep. Ken Ivory, who sponsored the legislation, isn't deterred even though the federal government hasn't given any indication that it plans to cooperate. Thats what you do any time youre negotiating with a partner. You set a date, said Ivory. Unfortunately, our federal partner has decided they dont want to negotiate in good faith. So well move forward with the four-step plan that the governor laid out. That plan involves a program of education, negotiation, legislation and litigation. Were going to move forward and use all the resources at our disposal, stated Ivory, who also heads the American Lands Council, which advocates the relinquishing of federal lands to the control of the states.
One might ask why Utah wants it's land back now. Well, it seems theres hydrocarbons in those hills. The Salt Lake Tribune reported on Tuesday that an analysis from three state universities states that Utah can afford to take over more than half the state from the federal government, and may even be able to make more money on it than the feds have. It should be noted that the transfer would require either an act of Congress or a successful lawsuit.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
My picture of it has it almost completely covered!
No, but I've been to Watson lake Yukon
We put up a Kingsport sign
I almost went to Roswell New Mexico but got diverted by my wife.
WOW!
“
Why should Washington be the one screwing them when their own ‘leaders’ can do it closer to home!”
Sarcasm aside, at lease they would have their own leaders as entirely and unambiguously responsible for their tribal situation.(they really are now in most cases)
“Which ones?
The originals; or the constantly shrinking ones they have now?”
The current reservations which will no longer shrink except by their own actions when they have title again.
indeed!
If I came; my mug would spoil the beauty!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.