Posted on 11/15/2014 5:42:24 PM PST by PROCON
This year, your real Christmas tree will be more expensive than it needs to be. That’s because the Department of Agriculture is imposing a fee on each fresh-cut tree sold.
A few months ago, the federal government created a national marketing program to advertise the virtues of real Christmas trees. It’s funded by a 15-cent surcharge that will be added to the cost of each tree sold. It’s not a tax, Washington insists -- merely a fee that you have to pay.
“The Christmas tree industry requested this initiative to fund Christmas tree research and marketing, the program will be funded solely by the industry, and the government is not imposing any tax on Christmas trees,” an Agriculture Department spokesman explains.
It’s a distinction without a difference. If a fee is imposed on a product by a government, it’s a tax on the consumer.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
fees == taxes everyone pays.
Ah, but if the industry asks the government to fund a industry-specific improvement program, but FUND IT from the government by a mandatory-government-required tax (er, fee) then the INDUSTRY is not to blame for the government-required extra tax (er, fee) on their own product that helps the industry, right?
So the industry gets more money from the government, but "obviously" is not to blame fro higher prices paid by the consumer, right?
I want to know if it’s collected at the cash register.
ten years from know we will be forced to recycle those trees year after year..
From Gruber we learned...... Roberts was right on
And see it listed on your receipt ......
Government should not be allowed to have a role in agriculture. It's not like they are actually going to help in some way. They just make things more expensive and more scarce.
If you’ve ever done that, I’m sure you understand it takes a whole ‘nother level of effort for the grower and the user, which is why less than 1% of trees are transacted that way.
An old friend grows Christmas trees locally. An IRS rep comes out and counts the holes and/or stumps and keeps a running record.
A few months ago, the federal government created a national marketing program to advertise the virtues of real Christmas trees. It’s funded by a 15-cent surcharge that will be added to the cost of each tree sold. It’s not a tax, Washington insists -- merely a fee that you have to pay.Fifteen cents, people, settle the **** down.
This is exactly why I purchase as few items as possible nowadays.
I’m forced to contribute to this massive crime syndicate, but I will pay them as little as humanly possible.
Both ways get taxed...It’s on trees sold.
Or if the fee is tied to the individual sales. Of course that amount would be added to each sale, whether listed on the receipt or not. That would be a national sales tax.
If it’s like other industry promotions there is an amount due from each business. I don’t know how that amount is determined but I’ve never heard of it being tied to an individual sale.
Not that I agree with any of this stuff.
exactly
Well then that is a national sales tax.
Good question. maybe someone or some group can put it to the test and see...
I suppose some people might be dim enough to actually fall for that.
Shazzaam! I wish the govt. would tax my business some more so that I can be more successful.
Some people have all the luck. /S
as I recall, Roberts referred to it as a tax....
What if it's a Hanukkah Bush?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.