Posted on 11/10/2014 8:21:56 AM PST by SeekAndFind
Supporters of Ohio governor John Kasich held signs at last Tuesday’s victory party memorializing his vanquished Democratic opponents: Ted Strickland, in 2010; Ed Fitzgerald, in 2014. And then a third name, as yet unchallenged: Hillary Clinton.
Those signs would have looked ridiculous in 2011, when Kasich’s attempt to reform the state’s collective-bargaining agreements ended in a “citizen’s veto” of the legislation in a statewide referendum and gave the Democratic party an off-year tune-up ahead of the 2012 presidential election.
Now, you don’t have to be a Kasich Crazy to think he has a chance at the Republican nomination in 2016. Chuck Todd, host of NBC’s Meet the Press, said the GOP donor class favors him. “I think the money likes Kasich,” Todd told Hugh Hewitt on Friday. “The Kasich résumé is the perfect gubernatorial résumé.”
That’s the kind of praise that Kasich never received when he ran for president in 1999. Then a House budget hawk, Kasich tried to combine an idiosyncratic demeanor (he described himself as Jolt Cola in a field full of Pepsi and Coke) with a campaign platform that he hoped voters would perceive as both compassionate and conservative. It didn’t take long for Texas governor George W. Bush to back a Brink’s truck full of money over that plan; Kasich dropped out in July of that year.
Fifteen years later, it’s Kasich who has crushed a political upstart. The Ohio governor defeated his hapless Democratic challenger, Ed Fitzgerald, 62–31. Kasich won 86 of Ohio’s 88 counties, including Cuyahoga County, where, in 2012, Cleveland voters gave President Obama a 40-point win over Mitt Romney. “In a pivotal state, maybe the pivotal state, he won a crushing victory, and that’s noticed throughout the Republican party,” former Minnesota congressman Vin Weber tells National Review Online.
Kasich’s victory was as overwhelming as his defeat had been in 2011, when 61 percent of Ohioans voted to repeal the collective-bargaining reforms he’d signed into law and his approval rating languished in the 30s. His background at Lehman Brothers made it easy for Democrats to portray the law, which affected police and firefighters, as an act of war on the working class and a danger to public safety.
“He realized that it was time to move on to other issues, and I think he did it very strongly,” says former Ohio house speaker JoAnn Davidson, a longtime Kasich ally.
Kasich returned to the theme that helped him shake the Wall Street fat-cat image during his campaign: jobs and the economy. He cut taxes, balanced the budget from the $8 billion shortfall that Strickland left behind, filled the state’s rainy-day fund, launched a new job-creation initiative, and streamlined the state government’s 77 job-training programs. From 2011 to 2014, the Ohio unemployment rate beat the national average as the state’s businesses created a quarter of a million jobs. Kasich also signed prison-sentencing reform into law and quadrupled the size of the school-choice program.
That record, combined with the failures of the Democratic nominee — “Ed Fitzgerald is the equivalent of the national Democrats running Michael Dukakis,” according to one Ohio political observer — ensured Kasich’s reelection this year.
Most controversially, he implemented — through executive action — the Medicaid expansion offered by the federal government as a provision of Obamacare. “It was important because it said to some people that Kasich is not just a one-size-fits-all ideological conservative,” said GOP strategist Terry Casey, a longtime friend of the governor’s.
The Medicaid expansion angered conservative voters who had rallied behind Kasich in 2010, when he declared that he was “in the Tea Party before there was a Tea Party,” but the move shouldn’t surprise anyone who remembers his presidential campaign. “It’s okay to stand up and tell people in your party that they’re too mean,” Kasich said on the campaign trail in 1999.
“When you die and get to the meeting with St. Peter, he’s probably not going to ask you much about what you did about keeping government small, but he’s going to ask you what you did for the poor,” Kasich likes to say today, to the irritation of Obamacare opponents.
The Republican-controlled legislature tried to withhold funds for the expansion — “the Good Samaritan was not funded by taxpayers,” state house Finance and Appropriations Committee chairman Ron Amstutz tells NRO — but Kasich used a small panel of lawmakers to circumvent the full body.
“I believe when you do better you need to reach out to people who live in the shadows and give them a bridge so they can participate in the economic promise of America,” Kasich said on Fox News in defense of his actions.
The Medicaid expansion had political benefits, too. It played especially well with Democrats and the kind of blue-collar independents who stayed home when Romney challenged Obama. “He can better understand certain parts of Ohio than most country-club Republicans could,” Casey said of the governor, a mailman’s son.
Though his resounding victory opens the door to a presidential bid, Kasich faces plenty of obstacles.
For one thing, Republican voters have no shortage of blue-state, Medicaid-expanding Republican governors to choose from in the upcoming presidential cycle. In the Midwest, Indiana’s Mike Pence, another former congressman, has foreign-policy chops and a stronger relationship with social conservatives. Michigan governor Rick Snyder has received less presidential buzz, but he has a similar economic-turnaround story to tell.
And of course, Wisconsin’s Scott Walker looms over the region’s governors. He didn’t expand Medicaid, and, unlike Kasich, he cemented his tea-party credibility by beating the unions in a series of showdowns over collective-bargaining reforms.
“There are some people that are first to land on the beach, and sometimes those are the people that get to the promised land first, and sometimes those are the people who get shot up and chewed up,” Casey says, when he surveys the field. “So, there are different ways to get to the promised land, if that’s where you want to get.”
The odds of Kasich emerging as the nominee from the second wave of the campaign are diminished by his past struggles raising money. “Either I solve the realistic problems that dogged me in the last campaign — essentially, the lack of a national financial base — or I won’t run,” he said in 2002.
Chuck Todd’s confidence notwithstanding, Kasich’s allies sound uncertain that he has solved that problem. True, he stockpiled about $20 million for his 2014 campaign. But that haul was facilitated by Ohio’s campaign-finance laws, which have higher donation caps for governors than presidential candidates enjoy. Kasich was also boosted by George W. Bush’s 2000 campaign-finance chairman, Mercer Reynolds, and other Bush donors who live in the Cleveland area. “If Jeb Bush runs, it makes it tougher to reach some of the money people that a Kasich might want and need to have,” Casey says.
As Kasich’s presidential profile grows, he’s likely to take fire from his right flank, even before the campaign gets underway. By pushing for repeal of Obamacare, Senators Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, and Marco Rubio can keep the issue alive and damaging to Kasich.
President Obama will veto the repeal, and Senate Democrats will filibuster most other Republican initiatives, though, so Kasich will have an opportunity to run against an ineffective Congress. “If you’re not there to do something, I don’t know what the heck you’d be there for,” he said Thursday in a potential preview of that attack.
Kasich won reelection by marrying George W. Bush’s compassionate conservatism to John McCain’s maverick image, but some political observers worry that he combines Joe Biden’s political instincts with Chris Christie’s occasionally off-putting brusqueness. “Kasich has a history of making gaffes that end up not being endearing,” said one person who has followed the governor closely. For instance, he had to apologize after calling a police officer “an idiot” multiple times while describing a years-old traffic stop.
That constellation of counterarguments has Kasich’s in-state critics suggesting he has a better shot at the vice-presidential nomination than at the top of the ticket; the Dayton Tea Party, for instance, assumes Kasich aspires to have the Republican nominee view him as the “logical” choice for a running mate.
Davidson and state representative Amstutz promise that Kasich has the political ability to run for any office he wants. “He does have things that he has a lot of passion about and he’ll wind them in,” Amstutz allows, calling the governor a “real person.”
Whatever Kasich decides about a presidential bid, he now faces a crucial six months. He must pass the state’s biennual budget, which means another fight with the state legislature about funding the Medicaid expansion. That will only position him further to the left in the Republican presidential field.
“When he first came in and kind of started laying out his plans, I think some people might have thought he was being too aggressive,” Ohio senate majority leader Tom Patton, a Republican, said last week. “And now, some of the people from his own party might think he’s not aggressive enough — read into that ‘not conservative enough.’”
— Joel Gehrke is a political reporter for National Review Online.
His idea is akin to Jack Kemp - build a bridge to poor and blue collar voters Republicans don’t normally don’t court.
If you’re a Republican you can combine fiscal conservatism with compassion for the downtrodden. And you don’t need to come across looking like a guy who doesn’t understand how ordinary Americans live.
Kasich has shown social compassion isn’t an exclusive preserve of liberals and Democrats.
You “don’t see it that way” and then describe it as that way.
You don’t need Medicare or Medicaid to expand medical jobs—in fact, they cause fewer medical jobs.
Anything “free” in terms of education is at the taxpayers’ expense. Unions will get into the tech sector if they have fewer teachers to sign up. Putting teachers out of a job is good?
Believing in “luck” is quite anti-Christian, too.
Nominate Kasich and lose OH again in 2016.
Adopting the strategies and policies of the left means you are the left.
Not yur friend on guns. Rules it out for me.
Who is “we”? The GOP establishment is not “we”.
RE: Not yur friend on guns. Rules it out for me.
What exactly did he do?
His impressive reelection win though won’t impact a presidential race, even in OH, in my opinion. Except for Romney and Dewey in 1944, haven’t all the GOp candidates won their home states? Even Ford took MI in 1976.
The point is showing Republicans are on the side of the little guy is both smart policy - and good politics.
People perceive conservatives as folks who fight for bailouts for big banks and oil companies and who cynically support the worst corporate welfare - taxpayer subsidies for people who don’t need them.
That’s hurt the GOP brand. And in a country with changing demographics, you’re not gonna win an election if you come across looking as mean and scowling. It doesn’t hurt conservatives to appear warm and caring and show they have ideas to help Middle Americans.
Obama wants the government to run their lives. Republicans want to help them to run their lives. That’s the difference between the liberal and conservative view of the human condition.
Like I said before. I am not going to speculate right now whether or not Kasich will toss his hat into the ring. Way too early for that-—although I have heard rumors that Ohio Sen. Rob Portman is also seriously considering running which would almost certainly complicate a theoretical Kasich presidential bid.
As a native Ohioan very familiar with that state’s politics, I was stunned and amazed at the sheer depth of Kasich’s victory there last week carrying all of the states heavily urbanized counties.
We Republicans have been told for years we cannot compete in urban areas. This is really my main point.
Believing in luck is anti-Christian, too
So what do you want to call it? The will of God working in unexpected ways?
Another fringe benefit is it puts sneaky Portman out of the picture, hopefully. Kasich is much more of an average guy, much more in touch with the problems real people face. Is he perfect? Far from it. But his campaign did not nod to elitist Chamber of Commerce type interests to win. He ran as a job creator who wants to bring manufacturing back, improve lives, and stay in touch with his rather humble background.
Joe should stick to writing about the wonderful life of gays and not try to tell conservatives, whom to consider for public office.
More GOP-e talking points. That “people perceive” nonsense did not bear out in this recent election, remember.
It was RINOs that fought for bailouts for big banks and oil companies—just like the Democrats have done. RINOs have hurt the conservatives, not the “brand”.
Its possible to cut taxes and spending and still appear like you care about people.
Isn’t that the essence of human appeal? No one wants an accountant.
Every one wants someone who understands you and who knows that your life is like that of most people - its hard, its rewarding and you take care of yourself... and occasionally, you need a little help to make the most of it.
You’re using liberal talking points again. Medicaid expansion means fewer hospitals (because they are ordered to consolidate), fewer jobs in the medical profession, fewer patients treated and less revenue—but it sure does mean bigger bureaucracy.
As for “luck”, given Kasich’s liberal bent, I would refer you to Isaiah 3:4.
The Republican Party won’t win as a country club and Chamber Of Commerce Party.
Mitt Romney’s wealthy background hurt him more than it helped.
I just can’t see John Kasich running for the presidency not with his support to Obamacare (which is not nationally accepted / nor excused by most / he would have to address that), and I surely don’t ever think the same of John Kasich and Joe Biden whatsoever because Kasich is intelligent. Biden is a airhead and does exactly (well, not always) what he is told by whoever is managing Obama. And, why people are scared of Biden is a mystery to me (if Obama were to be impeached).
I don't think Kasich is at heart a liberal. Governing Ohio is like herding cats; it doesn't even behave as one state. Kasich has done far better than a Dem ever would. It seems a lot of things he does are what is best for OH.
His big flaw is that the budget was balanced and any tax cuts starved communities of much needed revenue. So what did the dems do? Choose Fitzgerald, who as Cuyahoga County head siphoned money to things like a $5 million scoreboard for the Browns and overblown construction projects. They couldn't have picked anyone worse to run against Kasich's biggest vulnerability.
Kasich’s victory was as overwhelming as his defeat had been in 2011, when 61 percent of Ohioans voted to repeal the collective-bargaining reforms he’d signed into law and his approval rating languished in the 30s. His background at Lehman Brothers made it easy for Democrats to portray the law, which affected police and firefighters, as an act of war on the working class and a danger to public safety.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.