Posted on 10/21/2014 3:03:26 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
An expert witness paid with tax dollars by the United States Department of Justice testified that North Carolina election laws impact black voters disproportionately and that blacks are less sophisticated.
Charles Stewart, a political scientist was retained by the Justice Department to testify against voter identification laws and other election integrity measures. His testimony argued that ending same day voter registration and requiring voters to vote in the precinct where they live constitutes racial discrimination.
When asked if terminating the ability to register to vote on the day that someone casts a ballot impacts blacks disproportionately, Stewart testified in court that it did. Stewart:
It's also the case that -- well, yes, so it would, empirically more likely affect African Americans. Also, understanding within political science, that people who register to vote the closer and closer one gets to Election Day tend to be less sophisticated voters, tend to be less educated voters, tend to be voters who are less attuned to public affairs. That also tells me from the literature of political science that there are likely to be people who will end up not registering and not voting. People who correspond to those factors tend to be African Americans, and, therefore, that's another vehicle through which African Americans would be disproportionately affected by this law.
Blacks tend to be less sophisticated, less educated, and lower information voters, according to a taxpayer-funded Justice Department expert. Experts for the Voting Section of the United States routinely make tens of thousands of dollars for this sort of expert testimony, if not hundreds of thousands of dollars....
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
The democrats are racists, but they know what motivates their base. Thus, the Fergusson, Missouri nonsense and the tray martin electioneering in the 2012 election.
Or designated “public school” where they are blocked from choosing better schools.
Gibmedats are all about buying their vote: “Vote for me and I will give you gibmedats some stuff!”
Back in the 1920’s the Democrat party hated blacks but they knew they could gain power if they simply promised blacks money from the treasury, and we all know that once the citizens can vote themselves money from the treasury a country is doomed.
The funny thing is, the left has corrupted the language so much that “sophisticated” has come to mean “smart”.
To “sophisticate” something means to adulterate or corrupt it.
Yes, leftists are “sophisticated” in their thinking by their own pride in their assumption of superiority.
I think proper ebonic grammar would be
“Where my free $hit at?”
You don't think his name - the same as the black singer Al Greene - had anything to do with it? BTW - it was SC, not NC.
Are you implying that we're less sophisticated? LOL
Check this out for proper use of commonly misused words:
“Diversity” has a working definition of
“fewer white people and less Western Culture”
Di longer you verk here, diverse it gets.
If they are African-Americans they shouldn't be voting any way. Voting is for AMERICANS only.
So called African-Americans have as much in common with Africa as they do with the man in the moon...never been there, wouldn't know where to go on the continent if they managed to get there, wouldn't have any idea how to speak any of the languages, wouldn't last more than two weeks, and after that they would have no one to blame for their failures and die of LOSWTBAS (Lack Of Some Whites To Blame Anxiety Syndrome)
The way Democrats prey on blacks and the LIV's makes one wonder that if Down Syndrome people were a large enough demographic voting bloc that they would promise to get rid of their extra Chromosome 21 if they would vote for Dems.
Blacks tend to be less sophisticated, less educated, and lower information voters, according to a taxpayer-funded Justice Department expert.
What is untrue in that statement?
Is that what you infer?
(Right back atcha.)
LOL
I once private freepmailed a poster who incorrectly used the word infer rather than imply. I figured they’d want to know they were misusing the word. They did not appreciate the information. Understatement.
Begging your pardon, as we discussed with unanimity here at the time, it is often EXACTLY the Court’s job “to protect the people from the consequences of their political choices” — because those “consequences” for the past six years have far more often than not been unconstitutional laws and unconstitutional Presidential overreach.
I was posting a quote from Roberts. I wasn’t endorsing it.
Of course you were. Why include the quote, if not to support your comment?
If it is the job of the courts to protect people from the consequences of their political decisions, then it is the job of the courts to coddle people who are effing lazy and stupid.
Exactly the sort who shouldn't bother to vote anyway.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.