Posted on 10/09/2014 2:30:26 PM PDT by Kaslin
Pornography is everywhere. It’s an evil with far-reaching affects that damage many layers of society. But no one is hurt more by the overwhelming presence of pornography in our society than children.
According to a study by the London School of Economics, nine out of ten children who go online (by the way, many of them just doing their homework) will view pornography. Even when kids are acting responsibly and innocently, adults in the pornography business are so fixated on creating new porn addicts that they have made it virtually impossible for children to escape their grasp. Think about it—90 percent of all kids on the Internet will be subjected to the sexual images and values of perverted pornographers.
There should be a protected space in childhood where kids don’t have sex forced upon them—physically or mentally. Mere exposure to pornography inflicts a great deal of damage to developing attitudes, psyches and morality. Dr. Jill Manning, family therapist and author of What's the Big Deal About Pornography? A Guide for the Internet Generation, outlined the personal cost of pornography to children in a study she presented to a special U.S. Senate subcommittee. Her analysis of the peer-reviewed research reveals that pornography consumption by children is associated with the following trends (just to name a few):
Developing tolerance toward sexually explicit material, thereby requiring more novel or bizarre material to achieve the same level of arousal or interest.
Overestimating the prevalence of less common, harmful sexual practices (such as group sex, bestiality and sadomasochistic activity.)
Perceiving promiscuity as a normal state of interaction
Developing cynical attitudes about love
Developing a negative body image, especially for girls.
Donna Rice Hughes, CEO of Enough Is Enough (EIE), a non-profit organization determined to make the Internet safer for children and families, said, “For 20 years, children have been spoon-fed a steady diet of online pornography, with few laws or barriers of entry. Recent peer-reviewed research shows the extreme nature of Internet pornography is having a destructive impact on the mental, emotional and sexual health of adolescents, including addictive and even criminal behavior. “ (You can learn more about the work of Enough is Enough at www.InternetSafety101.org)
Many parents today know the sad truth and have already taken the necessary steps to protect their children when they are at home. (You can protect your kids by installing Internet filters on computers and mobile devices, by teaching them how to be safe online and by monitoring their online activity until they demonstrate the maturity needed to navigate the treacherous territory on their own.) However, when kids are out of the house, the protective barriers parents put up come down. Tech-savvy kids often figure out how to get around filters and, to further complicate the matter, public Wi-Fi in restaurants and cafes allows unprotected and unchecked Internet browsing.
But kids getting around filters or accidentally stumbling upon negative images isn’t all we have to worry about. Public Wi-Fi provided by many businesses also serves as a safe haven where perverted criminals can anonymously view, post and share child pornography, which only leads to further sexual solicitation and abuse of children.
As Mrs. Hughes said, “Now is the time for corporate America to take a stand against Internet pornography and child pornography that is damaging children. This is now a global public health issue that must be addressed holistically. Parents, corporate America and law enforcement must share the responsibility to protect the younger generations, and we must do so now—together.”
The Hope: Limiting the Reach of Pornography
EIE has been on the front-lines of Internet safety since 1994 and has recently launched a new campaign called “P*rn Free Wi-Fi” to encourage corporate America to join the fight to prevent the Internet-initiated sexual exploitation of children. (Rebecca served on the original steering committee of, and helped launch Enough is Enough way back in 1992 - incidentally, when she was pregnant with Kristin.)
Specifically, EIE is asking McDonald’s and Starbucks to start using pornography filters in their establishments across the United States, hoping that many other businesses will follow suit. Both companies have pornography filters in their establishments in the United Kingdom (due to a self-regulation initiative begun by Prime Minster David Cameron). Hughes said, “If McDonald’s and Starbucks can protect children from pornography and child pornography in other nations, they should do so here in the US. Offering safe Wi-Fi is in alignment with both McDonald’s and Starbucks’ corporate best practices and family-friendly policies. This would be a win-win for families and the companies’ respective brands. It’s not about censorship; it’s about corporate responsibility and good corporate citizenship.” (It’s worth noting that some conscientious companies in the U.S., like Panera Bread and Chik-fil-A, already have Internet filters to protect their customers.) Hughes continued, “We believe a united front of restaurants and retailers across the country voluntarily implementing filtering to block both pornography and child pornography will significantly remove much of the anonymity of this crime.”
Please join the fight to protect the innocence of America’s children. You can do so right now by signing the “P*rn-Free Wi-Fi” petition at friendlywifi.org, which will be sent to the CEOs of McDonald’s and Starbucks, and/or by donating to the effort. The short-term goal is to obtain at least 10,000 signatures by the end of November. Please help by signing the petition today and by forwarding the information to a friend.
As Hughes said, “Parents need to be the first line of defense to safeguard their children online. However, they cannot shoulder the entire responsibility alone. If parents understand that strangers can view hard-core pornography and child pornography in front of their kids in these establishments, I believe they would join us in saying, ‘Enough is enough!’”
umm, nobody needs porn to develop cynical attitudes about “love”. swap “porn” with “life” and that can do it too.
How about this. We establish a .xxx domain and force all porno onto it. That will make it trivial for the rest of us to block it.
Of all the things going on, porn isn’t on my list of things to be concerned about.
Amen to that
I have a friend with deeply cynical attitudes about “love.”
His ex-wife had way more to do with that than porn ever did.
True dat. However, since life today includes porn, it’s kind of a tautology.
Fwiw, I’m not cynical about love. Love is selfless service to those who can do nothing for you in return, and I see it every day in my church. I’m cynical about sex.
I believe pornography does debase society.
I admit when I saw several years ago that Britney Spears had accidentally? shown her privates that I looked.
After looking, I sort of wished I hadn’t.
I 2nd that
That sounds about as possible as cutting in front of MooseChelle Obama at the buffet line....
Agreed. Yes, it's damaging to some. So are a lot of other things.
There's always some nanny-stater who wants to put limits on everyone else.
Some folks just can't leave other people alone.
This is an interesting point. Why are children exposed to pornography? Because adults want access to pornography, and concern for children is peripheral. Why are children doing homework on the Internet? Because that's what's most convenient for adults.
Imagine a school that said, "In order to help protect our students from inappropriate material, this school will have all work done using books, paper, and pencils. Homework will be completed on paper. Research sources will be hard-copy published books and magazines. Note-taking will be done by hand."
Welcome to school in the 1980s (and all previous years), when we got much better test scores than students do today.
Taking the money out of it will help reduce this evil. Porn degrades women and degrades a natural sexual relationship
cynical about sex? sure it’s not cynical about women?
also don’t confuse agape love with romantic love. the stuff you’re describing in church is agape, not romantic.
What is the correlation between murdered black boys in Chicago to porn?
could also be filio/philio? love (brotherly). The NT translations really were innacurate when just using “love” to replace the terms that were different, on purpose - agape like God’s love, philo - brotherly, friendship, and eros - romantic w/sexual component.
i seriously don’t know. maybe i’m missing your point?
A savvy parent can do wonders to limit exposure (no parent can stop everything or pretty much anything).
However, this is an issue about which I simply don’t care. Adults do stupid s**t. Let ‘em. It’s also a First Amendment issue.
This is tying to carry the Pacific Ocean to the Atlantic Ocean, one bucket at a time, walking from West Coast to East Coast.
It took 14 posts? Freepers are slippin’, Man!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.