Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

O'Hare among five U.S. airports to beef up screening for Ebola
Chicago Tribune ^ | 10/08/14 | Dan Hinkel, Dana Ferguson, Jon Hilkevitch

Posted on 10/09/2014 2:59:14 AM PDT by Libloather

Stepping up efforts to stop the Ebola epidemic from spreading widely in the United States, federal authorities and officials in Chicago on Wednesday announced preventive measures that will include more intense health screening for airline passengers arriving at O'Hare International Airport from West African countries.

**SNIP**

When screening starts at O'Hare, federal personnel will staff a triage station in the international arrivals area and run passports of passengers coming from Liberia, Guinea and Sierra Leone to determine whether they've been in affected regions, Hasbrouck said. Passengers will fill out questionnaires and may be subject to fever detection, he said. Temperatures will be taken with a non-contact thermometer, federal officials said.

(Excerpt) Read more at chicagotribune.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: africa; airports; ebola; screening
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
Profiling is good.
1 posted on 10/09/2014 2:59:14 AM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Profiling is good, but security should be beefed up at all international airports. If I was traveling to the USA after Ebola exposure, whether for nefarious reasons or for free high-quality treatment, I would choose the airport with the weakest screening. Even our weakest screening should be effective, while the highest risk entry points should have the best we can create.


2 posted on 10/09/2014 3:06:40 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Only problem is that these people are beyond the sensical approach of actually severely restricting travel from the infected nations to the U.S.. These screening procedures will easily fail to spot infected individuals who are asymptomatic, or who lie when questioned.


3 posted on 10/09/2014 3:06:49 AM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Who would lie on a questionaire? Certainly there has never been a case of someone lying about being in an ebola hot zone right?

Oh. Wait.


4 posted on 10/09/2014 3:10:05 AM PDT by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Don’t allow west Africans in.


5 posted on 10/09/2014 3:11:24 AM PDT by KSCITYBOY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morpheus2009

Good news for all the people that spent hours on the plane with the person they find out has a fever when they land. Are we this effing stupid now?


6 posted on 10/09/2014 3:13:56 AM PDT by KSCITYBOY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I have a better idea. Let’s not let anyone from an epidemic area in until the ebola outbreak is dealt with properly.

It’s a whole lot easier to screen potential carriers when you don’t have any potential carriers to screen.


7 posted on 10/09/2014 3:16:36 AM PDT by DemforBush (A Repo Man is always intense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KSCITYBOY

Put Federal employee imbeciles in charge at just 5 airports!.

If the guy bleeding from his eyes has a temperature higher than their IQ, steal his tube of toothpaste.

What could go wrong?

President Ebola has screwed the pooch.

His CPUSA and moslem comrades thought they had the big takeover in the bag.

All hell is about to break loose, and the enemy within will be annihilated in the process.

moslems OUT!

marxists OUT!


8 posted on 10/09/2014 3:20:09 AM PDT by Rome2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
I was in China right after the SARS ban on non-essential travel had been lifted. Most international flights were still cancelled (36 hours in transit to get back because of lousy connections). At every airport in China, moon-suited guards were doing temperature checks.

Ebola is worse than SARS. I wonder why we don't treat it as seriously, and suspect it's because we are treating it as an affirmative action disease because of the African connection.

9 posted on 10/09/2014 3:23:39 AM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KSCITYBOY

Exactly. It is absurd to define this as “preventive”. This is moronic.


10 posted on 10/09/2014 3:36:04 AM PDT by Bluebird Singing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I have an idea. Why don’t we screen them before they board the aircraft in London / Frankfurt / Amsterdam / Paris etc etc.


11 posted on 10/09/2014 3:36:17 AM PDT by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

The dike is leaking through hundreds of holes. We will put fingers in 5 of those holes to stop the leak. Ridiculous in the extreme.


12 posted on 10/09/2014 3:43:51 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (Stop wishing for a perfect world. You may get it. Who will you talk to then?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Very reassuring that no international flights can directly access the US at any airport other than those busy east coast hubs. (scratching my head cuz I’m sure United is still running a direct Lagos to Houston...countless South American flights to Dallas, Houston and Miami daily.)We are in the best of hands.


13 posted on 10/09/2014 3:46:06 AM PDT by Artie (We are surrounded by MORONS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

This beefing up is not good enough. They need to stop taking passengers here who have recently been to the affected countries. Of course, as the disease spreads through other countries that will not catch everyone, and beefing up may be needed to stop any infected from those areas as well.


14 posted on 10/09/2014 3:50:53 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

“may be subject to fever detection, he said. Temperatures will be taken with a non-contact thermometer, federal officials said.”

Okay well this is a start but I don’t like the “may” in that sentence, also I’ve heard non-contact thermometers are notoriously inaccurate (they mean the forehead wands right?)also how does this cut down on those who have either taken something to suppress the fever, or like Duncan, not yet be that symptomatic? I know they probably feel they’re doing the best they can, not being able to close off travel from those areas and all, but I still think some infected people will get through.


15 posted on 10/09/2014 3:52:40 AM PDT by kelly4c (http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/post?id=2900389%2C41#help)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sphinx

This will be an tragic failure like everything obama’s “logic” touches.

I do not understand how the CDC can approve this. If I, with the education of registered nurse, can see how backwards this plan is, why don’t the geniuses in Washington?

These possible cases of ebola that they are screening out AFTER a long international flight of incubating in an enclosed plane, could have exposed dozens of innocents . . . and then what???? Only a President Obola could think this is a good idea . . .


16 posted on 10/09/2014 3:53:39 AM PDT by Bluebird Singing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Meaningless.

Most infected travelers are not sick yet. Exclusion or quarantine are viable options, this is just PR.


17 posted on 10/09/2014 3:56:43 AM PDT by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

If this is being handled in whole or part by the TSA just remember: To date they havent detected or caught a single terrorism nor have they detected the contrived incursions. I believe their grade is a 0. Also remember it was a ‘compassionate conservative’ who signed them into existence.


18 posted on 10/09/2014 3:58:47 AM PDT by 556x45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

the workers are striking at La Guardia

seems they didn’t think of the people who have to clean the contaminated planes...


19 posted on 10/09/2014 4:09:25 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morpheus2009

They wouldn’t lie, would they?


20 posted on 10/09/2014 4:17:30 AM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson