Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Representatives of two counties in far Northern California petitioned state officials Thursday for the right to form a 51st state called Jefferson, but I don't see the even the most infinitesimal modicum for consideration of their proposal. I am sure there are alternate legal approaches other than seeking permission from State officials for these counties to attempt to break away. But this being an unprecedented circumstance, it no doubt will be a long, arduous legal road ahead for any sort of progress made on the matter.

The bottom line is that it is rather obvious that the underlying, fundamental dynamics for these two counties to seek the creation of their own state is a a direct result of Obama, his policies, his desire to create as much havoc, dysfunction and upheaval in whatever way he can. His policies, especially regarding immigration, has directly impacted the political ramifications by these two counties in consideration of this move.

1 posted on 08/29/2014 3:07:12 AM PDT by lbryce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: lbryce
The filings were the first step in building a legal case that supporters believe will allow them to secede from California. They say the U.S. Constitution allows a region to petition the government for secession. If lawmakers ignore the petition, Jefferson proponents say it will give them standing to file a lawsuit.

Sue in what venue? Article IV Section 3 gives state legislatures the power to veto the creation of new states from their territory. The courts have nothing to say about it.

New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new State shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or Parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress.

2 posted on 08/29/2014 3:37:21 AM PDT by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce
I am sure there are alternate legal approaches other than seeking permission from State officials for these counties to attempt to break away.

No, there isn't. The US Constitution is very clear on that.

3 posted on 08/29/2014 3:58:19 AM PDT by Doug Loss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

I think in general....the public has come to realize that one-size-fits-all in terms of state governments...doesn’t work.

I could see a reason to open up a split season....move to seventy-five states...dump the necessity for US senators...and eliminate several methods from which the Supreme Court throws itself into state matters.

Anyone who lives in California will tell you that the current state government is dysfunctional and unable to represent regular state residents. It’s a lobbyist-government and geared toward wealth redistribution more than anything else.


4 posted on 08/29/2014 3:59:41 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

Four more Democrat Senators?


11 posted on 08/29/2014 4:32:26 AM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce
I am sure there are alternate legal approaches other than seeking permission from State officials for these counties to attempt to break away.

Not under the Constitution, no.

17 posted on 08/29/2014 6:50:16 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

There is already a Break-up California bid on the ballot, I believe.

There were more than enough signatures, on the “Break up California into 6 states” bid.

I think that is going to be voted on. Already.

No?


21 posted on 08/29/2014 7:02:40 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5700.html#2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

Starting to think we should consider this in North Idaho.


32 posted on 08/29/2014 10:36:48 AM PDT by Dr. Thorne ("Don't be afraid. Just believe." - Mark 5:36)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce; GeronL
Modoc and Siskiyou counties, which share a border with Oregon and have a combined population of about 53,000

Barking moonbats want 2 Senators and a House Rep. for 53,000 people?

Go screw.

38 posted on 08/29/2014 12:09:47 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (ISIS has started up a slave trade in Iraq. Mission accomplshed, Barack, Mission accomplished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

They’re NOT going to cut California up.

California gives 50 some odd electoral votes to Democrats every election cycle.

They’re NOT going to give that up.


40 posted on 08/29/2014 1:33:28 PM PDT by Tzimisce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce
The bottom line is that it is rather obvious that the underlying, fundamental dynamics for these two counties to seek the creation of their own state is a a direct result of Obama, his policies, his desire to create as much havoc, dysfunction and upheaval in whatever way he can. His policies, especially regarding immigration, has directly impacted the political ramifications by these two counties in consideration of this move.

The desire for a State of Jefferson goes back to the 1930s.


43 posted on 08/29/2014 1:50:58 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (Democrats: the Party of slavery to the immensely wealthy for over 200 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

They should let Eastern California in on it.


46 posted on 08/29/2014 4:07:55 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce
I am sure there are alternate legal approaches other than seeking permission from State officials for these counties to attempt to break away.

Article IV Section III of the U.S. Constitution states the following: "New States maybe admitted by the Congress to this Union, but no State can be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State without consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned, as well as of the Congress."
47 posted on 08/29/2014 5:44:19 PM PDT by TheFourthBranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

It seems that there’s a real weariness among people in the country of having their lives and property controlled by the criminals, communists, perverts and parasites who predominate in the urban areas. A simplification perhaps, but I’ve come to regard large segments of American society as TWANLOC. It’s no longer fixable folks.


48 posted on 08/29/2014 6:02:50 PM PDT by VR-21 (Next Stop, Willoughby.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce; fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; BillyBoy; Clintonfatigued; NFHale

The only way the “good” counties of Cali could ever be freed from the Sacramento regime is by getting semi-violent about it, demanding, rather than asking. I doubt many people have the will for such a thing, at least not at this point. If Cali continues along the path it’s on....who knows.


50 posted on 08/29/2014 9:50:03 PM PDT by Impy (Think for yourself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson