The poor old broad just can't get a break these days!
The poor old broad just can't get a break these days!
Warren is such an amature. Hill’s Dem spin machine could have her come out as an Indian princess in no time.
God help us all if that communist Is elected.
Funny picture.
Funny story.
I do remember how The Swimmer, Ted, backed the Clown over Hitlery...it came as a shock to the Demon Rat establishment. (Actually the old lady Hairy Reed did the same thing.)
Ted K. was probably the ONLY Demon Rat who could successfully stand up to the Hitlery juggernaut—any other ‘rat would have been pummeled by the sycophant media in service of She Who Must Not Be Named.
Very funny to see this happen again to HRC, though I must say it may not work this time since Ted isn’t really the one doing the pushing...other Kennedys are not as immune to criticism.
Funny picture.
Funny story.
I do remember how The Swimmer, Ted, backed the Clown over Hitlery...it came as a shock to the Demon Rat establishment. (Actually the old lady Hairy Reed did the same thing.)
Ted K. was probably the ONLY Demon Rat who could successfully stand up to the Hitlery juggernaut—any other ‘rat would have been pummeled by the sycophant media in service of She Who Must Not Be Named.
Very funny to see this happen again to HRC, though I must say it may not work this time since Ted isn’t really the one doing the pushing...other Kennedys are not as immune to criticism.
The woman has many advantages over Hillary.
First she has all the qualifications that Hillary has, she is female. The rest, like being a Senator or Secretary of State simply do not matter.
Second, she is far more attractive than Hillary.
Third, she has a message and Hillary has none. Warren's message is that we need more statism to shape our economy. She even cites the Ronald Reagan years as an example of misplaced economics claiming that trickle down failed and that the wealth "trickles up." She failed to cite in the video I saw a single statistic to back up this deranged claim which is at 180° variation from the truth. But that does not matter, she is enthusiastic and persuasive in tone and it is perception alone that matters. She stays on message. She relates her radical redistributionist nostrums with kitchen table needs which especially appeal to women.
Fourth, she will have the enthusiastic support of the media while Hillary would have only begrudging support.
Fifth, she is fresh, hardly the tired old bitch that Hillary is. Make no mistake, Warren is an out and out redistributionist and far more dangerous both as a candidate and in office than Hillary but she knows how to put a benign face on her treacherous, redistributionist radicalism that Hillary can never manage.
Sixth, Warren will get the women's vote without losing so much of the men's vote that Hillary forfeits.
Hillary is firmly in the pocket of the financial sector. Warren wouldn’t stand a chance.
Is Broomhilda now a victim of a Vast Leftwing Conspiracy?
One crime family vs. another...
Hillary seems to have made lots of enemies among natural allies. Pretty hard to believe, isn’t it?
Do the Kennnedy’s still matter?
All the Freepers who joke about ‘’Fauxcahontas’’ are probably the same ones who said America would never elect a Muslim named Barack Hussein Obama as president in a post 9-11 world.
I have a $5 and a pitcher of Margarita bet with my best friend that Hillary does not even run. She just can’t believe that Hillary won’t run. I told her the party will back somebody else. At first I thought Cuomo but I guess he’s toast now so Warren or Julian Castro.
Or, as she's better known on FR, "Fauxcahontas" and "Lieawatha."
Well, Elizabeth Warren is WAY more qualified than Sarah Palin was. /s
"We moved our base camp last night and we’re now positioned literally
within feet of the river. Have been sitting here watching the border
patrol patrolling in their riverboats all night and all morning..."~Jim Robinson
Please support Free Republic
click the pic