Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RUNOFF? MCDANIEL, COCHRAN BOTH UNDER 50 PERCENT AS FINAL VOTES COUNTED [McDaniel leads]
Breitbart ^ | June 3, 2014 | by MATTHEW BOYLE

Posted on 06/03/2014 11:35:56 PM PDT by Jim Robinson

HATTIESBURG, Mississippi —With final votes still being counted, Tea Party-backed state Sen. Chris McDaniel is poised to force a runoff against 42-year incumbent Sen. Thad Cochran (R-MS) in the GOP primary here, likely prompting a three-week dash to the finish of an epic race between conservatives and the GOP Establishment.

"Whether it's tomorrow or whether it's three weeks from now we will be victorious,” McDaniel said during a speech to supporters here around 11:30 p.m. CT. Cochran did not plan to address his campaign rally, according to NBC reporter Kasie Hunt.

With 97.9 percent of precincts reporting, McDaniel was up nearly 3,000 votes at 49.6 percent to Cochran's 48.8 percent, according to the Associated Press.

The likely runoff follows an all-night nail-biter between Cochran and McDaniel that saw each candidate see-saw between winner and loser. McDaniel supporters at an event here were ecstatic, cheering loudly at the television whenever new results come in while a country rock band and bagpipe band take turns entertaining the crowd.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Mississippi
KEYWORDS: 2014midterms; cochran; elections; mcdaniel; mississippi; ms2014; senateraces; teaparty; teapartyrebellion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-154 next last
To: saganite

Maybe there should be an effort here to raise funds for McDaniels.


GReat idea!!

https://mcdaniel2014.com/donate

Or....

https://secure.senateconservatives.com/step1?


61 posted on 06/04/2014 7:05:58 AM PDT by Jane Long ("And when thou saidst, Seek ye my face; my heart said unto thee, Thy face, LORD, will I seek")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: saganite; Hoodat

Do you have a reference for that?


Here’s what I posted last night, on another thread...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3163333/posts?page=763#763

http://www.pearlrivercounty.net/circuit/voter.htm


62 posted on 06/04/2014 7:10:02 AM PDT by Jane Long ("And when thou saidst, Seek ye my face; my heart said unto thee, Thy face, LORD, will I seek")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: billhilly

I believe that your time would be better spent trying to line up Cochran supporters and Democrats for the runoff. I do wish you well.


63 posted on 06/04/2014 7:13:55 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: tflabo
Notice how all these old geezers in DC cling to their seats in DC until they leave in the stiff, horizontal position.

Slick Willy fits that description perfectly and he was proud of it. Viagra must be wonderful stuff..... I'm sorry, I just HAD to!

64 posted on 06/04/2014 7:15:55 AM PDT by ExSoldier (Stand up and be counted... OR LINE UP AND BE NUMBERED...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
New update from WLOX.com:

US Senate GOP
99% OF PRECINCTS REPORTING
  Chris McDaniel 153,030 50%
  Thad Cochran (Inc.) 151,052 49%
  Thomas Carey 4,771 2%

65 posted on 06/04/2014 7:20:55 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

That 50 is arounded 49.55%

Close, but no cigar on this round.


66 posted on 06/04/2014 7:23:54 AM PDT by NeoCaveman (DC, it's Versailles on the Potomac but without the food and culture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

So who are the Carey voters going to gravitate to? McDaniel or Cochran?
____________________________________________________________________________________________________

McDaniel and Carey are both born-again Christians with strong ties to the Church Community. I’m thinking Carey’s folks will go for Chris.


67 posted on 06/04/2014 7:34:39 AM PDT by Din Maker (Susana Martinez in 2016. Governor, Conservative, Female and Hispanic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom

All Chris has to get is 50% plus 1 vote.


68 posted on 06/04/2014 7:35:33 AM PDT by Din Maker (Susana Martinez in 2016. Governor, Conservative, Female and Hispanic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom

I wouldn’t be too worried, the TEA Party has, as far as I can tell, won every run-off they’ve been in, and by large margins.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Wow! That’s true. Thanks for the reminder.


69 posted on 06/04/2014 7:36:50 AM PDT by Din Maker (Susana Martinez in 2016. Governor, Conservative, Female and Hispanic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Lake Living

What happens in the run off (if there is one) if the votes are still just as close as of right now?
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Then there will be a “Plurality” Winner. Whoever gets the most votes between the two candidates.


70 posted on 06/04/2014 7:37:59 AM PDT by Din Maker (Susana Martinez in 2016. Governor, Conservative, Female and Hispanic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: AJ504; who knows what evil?
My point was that we weren't dealing with one single national election, but we were dealing with 49 separate state elections. And even with runoffs in each of those 49 states, Clinton would have won. Perot votes would have split more towards the challenger than the incumbent.

As much as I loathe Clinton, GHWBush deserved to lose. He was the anti-Reagan. And no runoff would have turned his 37% share of the vote into a 50% +1 share.

71 posted on 06/04/2014 7:47:02 AM PDT by Hoodat (Democrats - Opposing Equal Protection since 1828)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

When is that woman Lindsay Graham’s primary?


72 posted on 06/04/2014 7:48:04 AM PDT by Mr. K (If you like your constitution, you can keep it...Period. PALIN/CRUZ 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

A voter who votes in the primary of one party may not “crossover” to vote in the run-off of another party.

Just like Texas. Anyone who did not vote in a democrate primary, can vote the republican run-off. Voting in the original primary is not a requirement.


73 posted on 06/04/2014 7:55:24 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: centurion316

Some of UR wrong if someone did not vote yesterday they still vote in run off. Its not just those who voted yesterday who vote in run off.


74 posted on 06/04/2014 8:00:29 AM PDT by ducks1944 (GOD Bless the USA .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: centurion316

Some of UR wrong if someone did not vote yesterday they still vote in run off. Its not just those who voted yesterday who vote in run off.


75 posted on 06/04/2014 8:00:54 AM PDT by ducks1944 (GOD Bless the USA .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Open primaries are the most insane thing I have ever heard of.


76 posted on 06/04/2014 8:01:36 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
Unfortunately not. I think runoffs are stupid, but there are states that require a primary to have 50 percent. It’s irritating and idiotic, but what can you do...

Runoffs are bad news for incumbents and the establishment. Cruz would not be a senator for Texas without runooffs. There have been several now that have unseated the GOP-e candidates. Expect there to be a major establishment push to get rid of run offs.

 

77 posted on 06/04/2014 8:21:40 AM PDT by zeugma (I have never seen anyone cross the street to avoid a black man in a suit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

beware another murky vs. joe miller scanario.


78 posted on 06/04/2014 8:43:15 AM PDT by dadfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

When is that woman Lindsay Graham’s primary?

\**************

June 10, 2014......


79 posted on 06/04/2014 8:52:54 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

Thanks for those links. So, a voter who has voted in one party’s primary can’t cross over and vote in the other party’s primary runoff election which means no voters in the democrat primary can now vote in the runoff but what about voters who didn’t bother to vote? They would still seem to be eligible and since Cochran already asked Dems to vote for him I can see his campaign targeting Dem voters who didn’t participate in the primary.


80 posted on 06/04/2014 9:07:29 AM PDT by saganite (What happens to taglines? Is there a termination date?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-154 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson