The article goes on to say the man was not charged and he did not file a claim to have the cash returned.
To: Responsibility2nd
These days, the only differences between LEOs and an ordinary street gang are government sponsorship and immunity from prosecution.
2 posted on
06/03/2014 2:27:02 PM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
("The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the government." --Tacitus)
To: Responsibility2nd
You are not allowed (I think) to carry more than 10k per person. Someone like this has to show where the money came from to get it back, they can't claim to have had it in the mattress for 20 years. Has to show the bank accounts he owned and took this money from to prove it was legit I think.
Drug money or seen as tax evasion I guess.
3 posted on
06/03/2014 2:27:24 PM PDT by
A CA Guy
( God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: Responsibility2nd
I smell merryjewanna! Kiss your rights goodbye!
Enjoy your police state!
4 posted on
06/03/2014 2:30:13 PM PDT by
rawcatslyentist
(Jeremiah 50:32 "The arrogant one will stumble and fall ; / ?)
To: Responsibility2nd
9 posted on
06/03/2014 2:33:09 PM PDT by
ConservingFreedom
(A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
To: Responsibility2nd
Only $138,121.00?
Seems like a strange amount.
I wonder how much there really was and where the rest of it went.
10 posted on
06/03/2014 2:34:01 PM PDT by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
To: Responsibility2nd
When they take all your money how can you pay to get it back? Catch 22 theft.
The Feds are stealing if they keep it without any criminal charges.
All money has "stuff" on it. I got tired of using sanitizer so now I just
use Windex with Ammonia in it.
14 posted on
06/03/2014 2:39:59 PM PDT by
MaxMax
(Pay Attention and you'll be pissed off too! FIRE BOEHNER, NOW!)
To: Responsibility2nd
"The article goes on to say the man was not charged..." Guilty enough to seize his cash, but apparently not guilty enough to try and stop from trafficking.
15 posted on
06/03/2014 2:42:50 PM PDT by
Flag_This
(Liberalism: Kills countries dead.)
To: Responsibility2nd
Our government is lead by criminals.
16 posted on
06/03/2014 2:47:26 PM PDT by
PieterCasparzen
(We have to fix things ourselves)
To: Responsibility2nd
Civil forfeiture gives cops “skin in the game” —incentive.
And THAT means that PROPERTY, not behavior, becomes the enforcement target.
There was a case from Southern California in which the cops killed the owner of a large plot of land they coveted, simply on the claim of ONE snitch that he had caught sight of ONE pot plant on ONE helicopter flight over the land in question.
Presto, warrant, dynamic entry, shot innocent owner dead, seized land.
This was about 15 years ago, a very egregious case.
17 posted on
06/03/2014 2:47:27 PM PDT by
gaijin
To: Responsibility2nd
I wonder how many of these seizures are actually payoffs to law enforcement. Legalized bribery, if you will.
20 posted on
06/03/2014 2:53:18 PM PDT by
Ken H
To: Responsibility2nd
The dog felt pressured to go along - otherwise the cops would have shot him.
22 posted on
06/03/2014 2:56:09 PM PDT by
glorgau
To: Responsibility2nd
lol - he should’ve rented a car instead.
23 posted on
06/03/2014 2:56:18 PM PDT by
Liberty Valance
(Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
To: Responsibility2nd
Legalized theft, pure and simple.
27 posted on
06/03/2014 3:31:04 PM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(Haven't you lost enough freedoms? Support an end to the WOD now.)
To: Responsibility2nd
29 posted on
06/03/2014 4:00:34 PM PDT by
CharleysPride
(aut numquid tute es legere me translate)
To: Responsibility2nd
With that much money he should have driven or flown “private”.
31 posted on
06/03/2014 4:32:17 PM PDT by
WellyP
(question!)
To: Responsibility2nd
With that much money he should have driven or flown “private”.
32 posted on
06/03/2014 4:33:42 PM PDT by
WellyP
(question!)
To: Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; albertp; Alexander Rubin; Allosaurs_r_us; amchugh; ...
34 posted on
06/03/2014 5:09:00 PM PDT by
bamahead
(Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
To: Responsibility2nd
I am strongly against civil forfeiture, but there was a tip to the cops; and just who transports almost $140K in cash from a legitimate business whether or not is smells like MJ.
It’s a three day drive. Don’t be stupid.
To: Responsibility2nd
We no longer live in a free country. This is just one of many avenues the .gov uses to enrich itself with our money. The banks probably encourage such things too. They don’t get their piece of the action if someone carries or deals in cash for the most part.
Also... A “smell” shouldn’t be admissible in court for anything, or be allowed as a factor to determine probable cause. No one can PROVE a ‘smell’ in one way or another, and they can be VERY subjective.
48 posted on
06/04/2014 5:18:30 AM PDT by
KoRn
(Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson