Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Legacy airframe and modern technology CONECT (B-52 Still has 8 Engines?)
USAF ^ | July 26, 2013 | Airman 1st Class Joseph Raatz

Posted on 05/27/2014 9:08:32 AM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie

BARKSDALE AIR FORCE BASE, La. (AFNS) -- Air Force Global Strike Command took delivery of a significantly enhanced Boeing B-52H Stratofortress in a ceremony here, April 25.

The B-52H spent the previous 10 months at Tinker Air Force Base, Okla., being refitted with the Combat Network Communications Technology, or CONECT, upgrade. This modification is designed to greatly improve the aircraft's utility in the modern battlespace and to keep the 50-year-old aircraft capable and lethal until at least 2040.

"The first CONECT B-52 we're about to receive is a major leap forward in advancing the BUFF on the battlefield," said Maj. Gen. Scott A. Vander Hamm, the 8th Air Force commander.

The CONECT upgrades provide the B-52H with digital display screens, computer network servers and real-time beyond line of sight communication links, allowing crews to stay connected to the world throughout their mission, officials said. A combined air and space operations center can now provide the aircraft with constant updated threat and targeting data, rather than the crew and mission being dependent solely upon information that was available at take-off.

"Over the past two decades we've seen rapid advancements in technology, and that has really changed way we operate on the battlefield, especially in the information environment," Vander Hamm said. "What hasn't changed is the need to advance our capabilities and integrate those technologies with information to provide our aircrew with the most up-to-date information and the ability to act on it."

The machine-to-machine interfacing introduced by CONECT also allows for rapid re-tasking and retargeting while eliminating potential human error, giving the B-52H the capability of conduct digitally-aided close-support missions in coordination with tactical air control parties on the ground. This ability to make precise changes in an instant is critical in the quicksilver world of modern combat.

"It's the integration of these and other CONECT aspects that are increasing the combat capability of this old, but very formidable, aircraft," Vander Hamm said.

Another facet of CONECT is the addition of networking devices to the aircraft to act as a digital framework, allowing for easier incorporation of new technologies in the future, officials said.

"Now when we add additional systems to the aircraft at some future date, we will be going from a digital component, across our new digital backbone, to another digital component elsewhere in the aircraft," said Alan Williams, the deputy program element monitor at AFGSC. "In the future, it will make upgrades easier to do because we'll already have the digital infrastructure in the aircraft."

Because CONECT requires making such extensive modifications to the aircraft, the upgrades can only be performed during Periodic Depot Maintenance, or PDM, at Tinker AFB. All aircraft are scheduled for PDM on four-year cycles.

According to officials, equipping a B-52H with CONECT requires nearly 7,000 man-hours to complete, or approximately nine months per aircraft. The Oklahoma City Air Logistics Complex at Tinker currently has the capacity to perform a maximum of 17 of these refits per year. All B-52H's are scheduled to complete the upgrade by 2020.

"The B-52 is here to stay," Vander Hamm said. "CONECT is keeping us current, relevant and credible in today's and tomorrow's fight."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last
Can anyone answer why they kept the 8 engine configuration. EMF Hardening?
1 posted on 05/27/2014 9:08:32 AM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: ImJustAnotherOkie
Air Porn!


3 posted on 05/27/2014 9:17:05 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alterations - The Acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie
These airframes aren't fifty years old. They're sixty years old.

Redundancy and fuel efficiency - range and altitude flexibility over deep targets, survivability - credibility in the eyes of a potential enemy.

A strategic bomber that just happened to be nearly perfect as a long-range cruise missile platform.

I love these aircraft.

4 posted on 05/27/2014 9:19:38 AM PDT by Prospero (Si Deus trucido mihi, ego etiam fides Deus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie
Eight engine configuration is a proven design for the B-52, have not heard of a rational reason (or plan) for changing it.

That said, I thought this was interesting:
"...equipping a B-52H with CONECT requires nearly 7,000 man-hours to complete, or approximately nine months per aircraft."

7K man-hours sounds like a near-complete aircraft rewire.

5 posted on 05/27/2014 9:21:21 AM PDT by Psalm 73 ("Gentlemen, you can't fight in here - this is the War Room".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

Probably the difficulty and expense of reconfiguring the aircraft electrical and hydraulic and fuel systems to do four engines instead of eight.


6 posted on 05/27/2014 9:24:22 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Haven't you lost enough freedoms? Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 73

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flight_of_the_Old_Dog

Fact follows fiction ;)


7 posted on 05/27/2014 9:24:25 AM PDT by Bidimus1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bidimus1

I enjoyed that book.


8 posted on 05/27/2014 9:28:50 AM PDT by null and void (Disarm Hollywood! No Guns for Box Office!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bidimus1

That’s the first thing I thought of when I saw the headline.... just now scrolled down to your post.... GMTA.


9 posted on 05/27/2014 9:30:07 AM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

Dumb question: Was there a 16-engine experimental heavy assembled ca. 1950?


10 posted on 05/27/2014 9:32:21 AM PDT by Elsiejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

BUFF!

Big Ugly Fat ......!


11 posted on 05/27/2014 9:34:29 AM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 73; ImJustAnotherOkie

Wikipedia has an explanation for staying with the 8 engine config. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_B-52_Stratofortress#Engines

Basically cost to do the upgrade and upgrade the tools, training, and so forth in the supply chain.

One of their arguments is it will reduce global warming so they must be grasping at straws.


12 posted on 05/27/2014 9:36:45 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

Ya lose six engines, ya still got two to get ya home. :)


13 posted on 05/27/2014 9:45:56 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi - Revolution is a'brewin!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
Still it is better than the original BUFF’s that were coal powered.
14 posted on 05/27/2014 9:51:05 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
I couldn't find the actual report: what was the projected lifetime of the B-52H after the proposed engine upgrade?

The reason I ask: if the B-52 was expected to be retired by now, replacing the engines back then would have been a questionable effort. But, latest extension would have resulted in a major cost savings, especially given the increases in the price of jet fuel.

The proposed engine was used in the 747, 757, and 767. So, it would still be in the supply chain.

15 posted on 05/27/2014 9:51:18 AM PDT by justlurking (tagline removed, as demanded by Admin Moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Bidimus1

I read that book. I thought it was great, and have since read more from Brown. He is very good.


16 posted on 05/27/2014 9:54:38 AM PDT by matthew fuller (No, I don't miss GWB- I miss Dick Cheney and Don Rumsfeld.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 73

It just seems pretty penny wise and pound foolish.

8 17k engines versus 4 74k very reliable low maintenance.

I guess that’s the hallmark of today’s military.


17 posted on 05/27/2014 9:55:25 AM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (zerogottago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

The new engines made from single crystal blades are even better odds than the 8 engines.

One thing I didn’t consider is ground clearance.


18 posted on 05/27/2014 10:08:26 AM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (zerogottago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

You could not merely replace the 8 engines with two (or 4), you would need to completely replace the wings. Entirely different load profile, dontcha know.


19 posted on 05/27/2014 10:11:14 AM PDT by John Valentine (Deep in the Heart of Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson