Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

After outcry, Hagel orders review of female hairstyle policies
Stars & Stripes ^ | April 29, 2014 | Jon Harper

Posted on 04/30/2014 1:50:15 AM PDT by Timber Rattler

Following an outcry by members of the Congressional Black Caucus, Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel is considering changing hairstyle regulations that affect female African-American servicemembers.

On Tuesday, Hagel sent a letter to lawmakers announcing that, within 30 days, each of the services will review the definitions of authorized and prohibited hairstyles contained in each of their respective policies and revise any language that might be considered offensive.

Caucus members had complained that a recently updated Army regulation governing troops’ hairstyles was racist and unfairly targeted African-American women.

(snip)

Hagel has also ordered the services to conduct a three-month review of their hairstyle policies as they pertain to African-American women. The purpose of the review is “to ensure standards are fair and respectful of our diverse force, while also meeting our military services’ requirements,” Hagel said in the letter, which was obtained by Stars and Stripes.

(Excerpt) Read more at stripes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: hagel; hair; military; secdef
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
Never mind whether or not said minority hairstyles are suitable for harsh combat conditions...
1 posted on 04/30/2014 1:50:15 AM PDT by Timber Rattler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

Racism—what non-white people use to obtain privileges that white people neither desire nor can obtain if they did desire.


2 posted on 04/30/2014 1:59:38 AM PDT by the anti-mahdi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

From civil rights to special rights to special privileges to revamping the militaty to accommodate Black sensitivities regarding “style.”

Is there anyone who did NOT see that coming?

The Black definition of the word “fair” is pretty strange.

Or was “fair” always a smokescreen?


3 posted on 04/30/2014 2:30:18 AM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

To be fair...and have equity and not to discriminate....

Crew cut for all service personnel....male or female...

Just think how much money they would save on hair care products...


4 posted on 04/30/2014 2:38:34 AM PDT by Popman ("Resistance to Tyrants is Obedience to God" - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

A trip through the CS chamber training should be sufficient for illustrating the need for the regulation. Perhaps some of the members of the CBC with the proscribed styles would like to join their military brethren for the exercise??? Naaah, that would be too much like leadership for that whiny crowd.


5 posted on 04/30/2014 2:41:38 AM PDT by T-Bird45 (It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

High and tights for everybody.
No exceptions.


6 posted on 04/30/2014 2:55:32 AM PDT by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler
Don't like a policy?
Cry "Racist!", and it'll change in short order.

Of course this works best if you happen to be black.

7 posted on 04/30/2014 2:59:53 AM PDT by grobdriver (Where is Wilson Blair when you need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

If women are allowed to wear long hair in the military, so should the men.


8 posted on 04/30/2014 3:00:36 AM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

I concur. High and tight for all. One would think America’s Secretary for Defense would spend his time focusing on the ability of our armed forces to defend and fight, rather than on haircuts or hair styles. Keep it simple.


9 posted on 04/30/2014 3:01:09 AM PDT by Tudorfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler
EVERY policy from the Obama administration is designed to splinter, divide the American people.

As America moves further every day into a bickering cacophony of self-interested groups clawing at each other’s throats, the only means to keep order is through the heavy hand of an all powerful government backed up with national police forces.

It is a recipe for dissolution of the republic. It is what the rats work toward, and what the GOP will do nothing to stop.

10 posted on 04/30/2014 3:05:16 AM PDT by Jacquerie (By their oaths, it is the duty of state legislators to invoke Article V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

Cornrows for Combat!


11 posted on 04/30/2014 3:10:28 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (Operating out of weakness? Imagine if he was working from a position of strength!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tudorfly

——One would think America’s Secretary for Defense would spend his time focusing on the ability of our armed forces to defend and fight, rather than on haircuts or hair styles. ——

Well...under this regimen Hagel job is to reform the worlds best military into complete poltical correctness to implement the left social experiments....

As for defending his country....only at the expense of not offending some filthy muzzie dog...


12 posted on 04/30/2014 3:11:20 AM PDT by Popman ("Resistance to Tyrants is Obedience to God" - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

In harsh combat you don’t want hair that can be grabbed by your enemy and yanked to break your neck.

What are these people thinking? And why are they in charge?


13 posted on 04/30/2014 3:11:58 AM PDT by plangent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

The world is coming apart at the seams, and this fool is worried about military hair styles??!!


14 posted on 04/30/2014 3:13:16 AM PDT by Shane (When Injustice Becomes Law, RESISTANCE Becomes DUTY.----T.Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

It really does never change wrt hair in the military.

I remember Elmo’s Navy - long sideburns, relaxed hair length policies. As an Airman at the time, I remember seeing Elmo’s sailors out an about in the civilian world and felt kinda jealous.

The had 75% of the hippie look already down. Shoot, they even had the bell bottomed jeans!


15 posted on 04/30/2014 3:24:32 AM PDT by Gaffer (Comprehensive Immigration Reform is just another name for Comprehensive Capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T-Bird45

“A trip through the CS chamber training should be sufficient for illustrating the need for the regulation”

Do they even do this any more?? You know the gas could be dangerous and I am not sure the EPA would allow it!


16 posted on 04/30/2014 3:25:13 AM PDT by Mouton (The insurrection laws perpetuate what we have for a government now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

I thought hair styles were suppose to allow the head to fit inside a helmet...


17 posted on 04/30/2014 3:42:13 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

What’s next?

Letting the guys wear their pants halfway down?


18 posted on 04/30/2014 3:45:03 AM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler
“The use of words like ‘unkempt’ and ‘matted’ when referring to traditional hairstyles worn by women of color are offensive and biased."

The nerve of the Army trying to ban the 'Rutger's-do.' Paging Don Imus.

19 posted on 04/30/2014 3:58:15 AM PDT by DaBroasta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

Who joins the military to remain an individual?


20 posted on 04/30/2014 4:10:20 AM PDT by SMARTY ("When you blame others, you give up your power to change." Robert Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson