Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Master Cut: Rand Paul Suggests Jimmy Carter Better Than Ronald REAGAN On Budget
Breitbart TV ^ | 2014/04/23 | Breitbart Staff

Posted on 04/23/2014 1:06:25 PM PDT by Josh Painter

David Corn of Mother Jones has assembled a number of clips from Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) over the years criticizing former President Ronald Reagan for the budgets he signed into law. In some cases, Paul declared Reagan worse on budgetary issue than his predecessor, former President Jimmy Carter.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Kentucky; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: davidcorn; fiscalpolicy; jimmycarter; kentucky; libtardian; motherjones; randconcerntrolls; randpaul; randpaultruthfile; ronaldreagan; sarahpalin; tedcruz; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
To: tennmountainman

he’s a nut job for SURE.


21 posted on 04/23/2014 1:23:06 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Paul doesn’t deny it.

Paul later responded to the Mother Jones piece with a statement: “I have always been and continue to be a great supporter of Ronald Reagan’s tax cuts and the millions of jobs they created. Clearly spending during his tenure did not lessen, but he also had to contend with Democrat majorities in Congress.”


22 posted on 04/23/2014 1:23:54 PM PDT by Irenic (The pencil sharpener and Elmer's glue is put away-- we've lost the red wheelbarrow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

If it was highly unusual for Rand to make such bizarre comments, then yeah. I would agree that this is liberal agit-prop. Even if Breitbart reported it.

But becauase Rand Paul is DAILY showing his true colors as a libertarian loonie and new reports are ALWAYS coming in that portray him as no better that dear old dad....

Then it is easy to see that Rand Paul is no real conservative.


23 posted on 04/23/2014 1:25:01 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Rand Paul: Time for GOP to soften war stance
...by softening its edge on some volatile social issues and altering its image as the party always seemingly "eager to go to war... We do need to expand the party and grow the party and that does mean that we don't always all agree on every issue" ... the party needs to become more welcoming to individuals who disagree with basic Republican doctrine on emotional social issues such as gay marriage... "We're going to have to be a little hands off on some of these issues ... and get people into the party," Paul said.
[Posted on 01/31/2013 5:08:50 PM PST by xzins]

24 posted on 04/23/2014 1:25:34 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Rand Paul On Shutdown: "Even Though It Appeared I Was Participating In It, It Was A Dumb Idea"
I said throughout the whole battle that shutting down the government was a dumb idea. Even though it did appear as if I was participating in it, I said it was a dumb idea. And the reason I voted for it, though, is that it's a conundrum. Here's the conundrum. We have a $17 trillion debt and people at home tell me you can't give the president a blank check. We just can't keep raising the debt ceiling without conditions. So unconditionally raising the debt ceiling, nobody at home wants me to vote for that and I can't vote for that. But the conundrum is if I don't we do approach these deadlines. So there is an impasse. In 2011, though, we had this impasse and the president did negotiate. We got the sequester. If we were to extend the sequester from discretionary spending to all the entitlements we would actually fix our problem within a few years.
[Posted on 11/19/2013 12:16:51 PM by Third Person]

25 posted on 04/23/2014 1:25:49 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ilgipper

yep yep


26 posted on 04/23/2014 1:25:59 PM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (Tokyo Rove is more than a name, it's a GREAT WEBSITE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Rand Slams Congress for Funding Egypt's Generals: 'How Does Your Conscience Feel Now?'
Sen. Rand Paul is hammering his fellow senators for keeping billions in financial aid flowing to Egypt's military -- even as Cairo's security forces massacre anti-government activists. [by "anti-government activists" is meant church-burning Christian-murdering jihadists]
[Posted on 08/15/2013 5:44:10 PM PDT by Hoodat]

27 posted on 04/23/2014 1:26:09 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Rand Paul's immigration speech
...The Republican Party must embrace more legal immigration.

Unfortunately, like many of the major debates in Washington, immigration has become a stalemate-where both sides are imprisoned by their own rhetoric or attachment to sacred cows that prevent the possibility of a balanced solution.

Immigration Reform will not occur until Conservative Republicans, like myself, become part of the solution. I am here today to begin that conversation.

Let's start that conversation by acknowledging we aren't going to deport 12 million illegal immigrants.

If you wish to work, if you wish to live and work in America, then we will find a place for you...

This is where prudence, compassion and thrift all point us toward the same goal: bringing these workers out of the shadows and into being taxpaying members of society.

Imagine 12 million people who are already here coming out of the shadows to become new taxpayers.12 million more people assimilating into society. 12 million more people being productive contributors.
[Posted on 03/19/2013 7:04:07 AM PDT by Perdogg]
Rand Paul calls on conservatives to embrace immigration reform
Latinos, should be a natural constituency for the party, Paul argued, but "Republicans have pushed them away with harsh rhetoric over immigration." ...he would create a bipartisan panel to determine how many visas should be granted for workers already in the United States and those who might follow... [and the buried lead] "Imagine 12 million people who are already here coming out of the shadows to become new taxpayers...
[Posted on 04/21/2013 1:52:42 PM PDT by SoConPubbie]
[but he's not in favor of amnesty, snicker, definition of is is]

28 posted on 04/23/2014 1:26:34 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...

Thanks Josh Painter. The nut doesn’t fall far from the tree.


29 posted on 04/23/2014 1:26:39 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

and in addition, his followers are very young, very socially liberal, not likely to vote for any Republican in national election except Rand.

And he knows this, and gladly has them all along, does nothing to dissuade them.


30 posted on 04/23/2014 1:27:23 PM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (Tokyo Rove is more than a name, it's a GREAT WEBSITE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Best way to mitigate being taken out of context is not to bash Reagan in order to promote your wacko dad to Ronulans who were already worshiping Ron.

In other words, the Reagan-bashing by Rand was purely gratuitous, uncalled for and not necessary.

But the holier-than-thou wing of the libertarian faction can’t stop themselves from sneering and smearing good conservatives.


31 posted on 04/23/2014 1:27:37 PM PDT by Josh Painter (Shorter Obamunists: "We are the people the founding fathers warned us about.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Sans-Culotte

It disgusts me that after his numerous trips into liberalism and skirting the edges of it often, people here still make excuses for him. And they are no better than any other liberal when they do it.

This ‘have my cake and eat it too’ mentality is for the birds. If people want to sit at the conservative table for dinner, they should do it. But don’t bring their moderate at best POS ‘date’ and expect everyone there to accept it.


32 posted on 04/23/2014 1:28:22 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart (How's that 'lesser evil' workin' out for ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice

Oh come on, Carter was too busy making every decision in the White House.. to his credit, as I understand it he did maintain a very well stocked janitors closet!


33 posted on 04/23/2014 1:28:44 PM PDT by A. Morgan (Ayn Rand: "You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ilgipper

Yeah, he’s an asset all right. Sure. Wants illegals to be made citizens. More an ass than an asset!!!!!!


34 posted on 04/23/2014 1:28:51 PM PDT by Shimmer1 (God is not dead!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: pieceofthepuzzle

Well, we know by his actions, Ron Jr. is absolutely a company man. He proves it about once a week.


35 posted on 04/23/2014 1:29:43 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart (How's that 'lesser evil' workin' out for ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter

This is counter to what history proves. Reagan came into office with a huge inflation percentage and a very large debt. He lowered taxes and in a short time reversed all that. The economy Clinton came into was Reagan’s doing. Carter was a complete disaster when it came to the economy. I cannot think of anyone worse.


36 posted on 04/23/2014 1:31:17 PM PDT by maxwellsmart_agent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

That’s the same stirring defense Harry Reid used when called on his “Obamacare complainers are liars” libel.

And Rand’s not a conservative.


37 posted on 04/23/2014 1:34:07 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Irenic

This was a mother jones piece? or a brietbart?

If it was Mother Jones then that makes sense (a libtard hit piece) and Rand Paul’s response also makes sense- Reagan DID cut taxes, but a Democrap-controlled congress broke their promise to cut spending


38 posted on 04/23/2014 1:35:06 PM PDT by Mr. K (If you like your constitution, you can keep it...Period. PALIN/CRUZ 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: what's up

Who again are those strong leaders who fought wars and won them and then brought our troops home in in less than 5 years?


39 posted on 04/23/2014 1:35:13 PM PDT by Sioux-san
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: pieceofthepuzzle

The Pauls aren’t conservatives, and while they self-identify as Republicans, they are obviously Democrats in the good old KKK tradition.


40 posted on 04/23/2014 1:35:25 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson