THE BUNDY DAUGHTER SPEAKS OUT ON GOVERNMENT TERRORISM AGAINST HER FAMILY! (Nevada Rancher)

America's Freedom Fighters ^ | Apr 9, 2014 | Clark Kent

[xzins]

By SHIREE BUNDY COX:

I have had people ask me to explain my dad’s stance on this BLM fight.

Here it is in as simple of terms as I can explain it. There is so much to it, but here it is in a nut shell.

My great grandpa bought the rights to the Bunkerville allotment back in 1887 around there. Then he sold them to my grandpa who then turned them over to my dad in 1972.

These men bought and paid for their rights to the range and also built waters, fences and roads to assure the survival of their cattle, all with their own money, not with tax dollars.

These rights to the land use is called preemptive rights.

Some where down the line, to keep the cows from over grazing, came the bureau of land management. They were supposed to assist the ranchers in the management of their ranges while the ranchers paid a yearly allotment which was to be use to pay the BLM wages and to help with repairs and improvements of the ranches.

My dad did pay his grazing fees for years to the BLM until they were no longer using his fees to help him and to improve.

Instead they began using these money’s against the ranchers.

They bought all the rest of the ranchers in the area out with their own grazing fees.

When they offered to buy my dad out for a penence he said no thanks and then fired them because they weren’t doing their job.

He quit paying the BLM but, tried giving his grazing fees to the county, which they turned down.

So my dad just went on running his ranch and making his own improvements with his own equipment and his own money, not taxes.

In essence the BLM was managing my dad out of business.

Well when buying him out didn’t work, they used the indangered species card.

You’ve already heard about the desert tortis.

Well that didn’t work either, so then began the threats and the court orders, which my dad has proven to be unlawful for all these years.

Now they’re desperate.

It’s come down to buying the brand inspector off and threatening the County Sheriff.

Everything they’re doing at this point is illegal and totally against the constitution of the United States of America.

Now you may be saying,” how sad, but what does this have to do with me?” Well, I’ll tell you.

They will get rid of Cliven Bundy, the last man standing on the Bunkerville allotment and then they will close all the roads so no one can ever go on it again.

Next, it’s Utah’s turn. Mark my words, Utah is next.

Then there’s the issue of the cattle that are at this moment being stolen. See even if dad hasn’t paid them, those cattle do belong to him.

Regardless where they are they are my fathers property. His herd has been part of that range for over a hundred years, long before the BLM even existed.

Now the Feds think they can just come in and remove them and sell them without a legal brand inspection or without my dad’s signature on it.

They think they can take them over two boarders, which is illegal, ask any trucker. Then they plan to take them to the Richfeild Auction and sell them.

All with our tax money.

They have paid off the contract cowboys and the auction owner as well as the Nevada brand inspector with our tax dollars.

See how slick they are?

Well, this is it in a nut shell. Thanks”

[Lou Budvis]

If the owner is ‘us,’ has he been sending you a dividend on the money he saved by grazing his cattle for free on ‘our’ land? Or some steaks?

[WayneS]

Just a reminder, the federal government does not have rights - it has powers.

[editor-surveyor]

He never owed any fees!

The imposition of fees was unlawful.

I hope they impose fees to your toilet seat next.
.

[tacticalogic]

I don’t see how “why?” makes any difference.

Somebody wants him off that land, and it's costing us a bunch of money to do it for no good reason that I can see.

[xzins]

Then when Bundy stopped paying his grazing lease, he stopped having access rights to that land.

That's not the way the daughter explains it, nor the way he explained it on TV last night.

So, there are 2 sides to this story, and today the Nevada Governor slammed the Fed and not Bundy.

[editor-surveyor]

We don’t need no stinking reasons...

[sport]

Dollars to donuts that Reid ends up with his ranch after he is either killed and his family bankrupted and imprisoned or he is imprisoned along with his family.

[AppyPappy]

Then why did he pay them?

[Lockbox]

The land that the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo brought into the United States became, between 1850 and 1912, all or part of ten states: California (1850), Nevada (1864), Utah (1896), and Arizona (1912), as well as the whole of, depending upon interpretation, the entire state of Texas (1845) that then included part of Kansas (1861), Colorado (1876), Wyoming (1890), Oklahoma (1907), and New Mexico (1912).

Let me understand your logic, so the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo gave all this land to US Government and anyone on the land can be removed? So for all of California and Texas the people need to leave?

[taxcontrol]

Can be but the Constitution does not require it to be. And since it is not ... the full powers of the enumerated Congressional legislative authority apply.

[WayneS]

Adverse possession? That’d be an interesting argument.

The BLM stopped taking proper care of the land. The rancher maintained the land for ‘x’ number of years at his expense - therefore he claims it as his own.

It might actually be worth a try, depending upon the length of time stipulated I Nevada law before such a claim to be made. And assuming, of course, that he really did pay for all maintenance and improvements on the land.

[xzins]

And I haven’t been sending him a check for when I walk in the parks, either....free of charge. They eat the grass; I trample the grass AND fish in the waters with a STATE fishing license. I didn’t send him any smoked trout.

We the people...own the land. There is nothing in the Constitution that gives the Federal government authority to own vast tracts of land.

The 10th amendment then, gives it to the states or to the people.

The Fed’s out of control, Lou. I’m sure you realize that.

[crz]

“NO WAY would our people or Eric Holder’s justice department EVER let the NSA get away with a scandal or something bad against this country.”

Live in a fantasy world much? Really? Eric Holder? You put much faith in such? Bet the next thing will be that you think Lerner is being set up. Naw, they aint doing anything wrong now are they?

[editor-surveyor]

>> “Look, the guy, by the law, has been trespassing. It was never his land” <<

.
Your ignorance is impressive.

[TigersEye]

I didn’t resort to any name calling. None. Why are you resorting to lying?

[Lou Budvis]

I do not think you can get a prescriptive easement against the federal gov’t because easements are an issue of state law and therefore cannot override federal law.

Further, his payment for grazing in the past indicates that he acknowledges that the land is not his.

[editor-surveyor]

Fear, plain and simple.

Same stupid reason that we obey their unconstitutional gun laws.
.

[glorgau]

Once he stopped paying he gave up his “rights”. Sounds like the Feds bent over backwards on this one.

[AppyPappy]

Well, you can’t pay them and then not pay them.

It’s time for Mr Bundy to come out of the closet and declare he is a proud gay man. That will screech everything to a halt.

[editor-surveyor]

>> “There is nothing in the Constitution that gives the Federal government authority to own vast tracts of land.” <<

.
True, in fact, they are forbidden to own any land but the reservations that were specified.
.