Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No, "Don't Ban the Bossy" Word
American Thinker ^ | March 27, 2014 | Jonathon Moseley

Posted on 03/27/2014 4:56:51 AM PDT by Moseley

"Ban the Bossy", a campaign overseen by former Facebook executive Sheryl Sandberg, is the new feminist push. The implication of the “Ban the Bossy” campaign is that girls and women are getting criticized because they are female, rather than because they are (some of them) occasionally rude, just like men can easily be.

It all went wrong in the 1970s when feminist leaders picked male jerks as their role models. Feminists did not copy behavior that men admire in other men or behavior that stimulates cooperation and encourages other men to follow leadership. Instead, feminists used the worst of men as models. For decades, feminism has been teaching women to act like the scoundrels whom other men don’t like. Women then wonder why reactions are not as desired.

‘Bossy’ behavior is bad whether by women or men. But feminists have made a mess of American society and culture. That’s what liberals do. Liberals wreck things.

The new campaign is based on the thesis: “When a little boy asserts himself, he's called a “leader.” Yet when a little girl does the same, she risks being branded “bossy.’” False. Well, you could drive an oil tanker through the loophole qualifier “risks.” Maybe what is being “risked” will happen, maybe it won’t. Probably not.

Now, asserting oneself -- pleasantly -- is good, whether one is male or female. Many readers will assume I mean “Be a doormat.” I want a “No Doormat” doctrine, for men and women. I am usually called bossy (pushy) when telling someone to stop treating me badly. These days it is usually a woman wanting to boss me around.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: backlash; bossy; feminism; leanin
Starting in the 1960s and 1970s, maybe earlier, feminists launched a massive campaign to teach women to behave like men in order to win equality in the work place. I remember personally reading about this national campaign in the 1970s in my aunt’s copies of New Woman Magazine and indeed everywhere. Their theory was that to be accepted in the business world, what was then “a man’s world,” women needed to act more like men in the office. Women were not advancing in corporate America because they were not acting the way successful men act.

Trouble is: Feminists did not study successful men. They didn’t bother to carefully identify the behaviors by men that actually lead to success. Instead, obnoxious men stick out like a sore thumb. Female observers of “a man’s world” assumed that the loud and pushy ones were the powerful men. And then two generations of American women were taught to copy those bad examples.

Ronald Reagan had a quote sitting on his desk: “There is no limit to what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit.” That is real power. Men who are truly influential are not bossy. Assertive, strong, and decisive, yes. Obnoxious, no.

“Winning” for men means coming in first, but then being able to buy the other team a round of drinks afterwards and cheerfully remain friends with those who came in second. For men growing up (at least it used to be this way) you haven’t truly won in competition, fair and square, if you cannot go out for lunch and swap jokes with the other team and slap each other on the back.

Feminists who set the tone for their movement did not understand what they were looking at within the man’s world of business. Boys and men are socialized (traditionally) to play sports as a team. Yes, everyone tries to do their personal best. Yes, winning is the goal.

But a man trying to win at the expense of his teammates has violated the norms of male culture. A boy or a man who will not work together for the good of the team is an outcast. One who is only in it for himself reaps hostility. (Note, though: A team is not about serving the leader’s personal interests, but about pursuing common goals together. The team’s leader could be the offending prima donna.)

1 posted on 03/27/2014 4:56:51 AM PDT by Moseley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Moseley

No, not it’s not Sheryl Sandberg, it’s Sheryl “Bossy” Sandberg.


2 posted on 03/27/2014 5:00:48 AM PDT by Stosh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moseley

Sandberg doesn’t see the irony. She’s the reason Zuckerberg married an Asian girl.


3 posted on 03/27/2014 5:03:05 AM PDT by Dr. Ursus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stosh

I work with men....thank goodness.


4 posted on 03/27/2014 5:11:08 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Ursus

I heard a joke among Europeans.. In heaven your house is American and your wife is Japanese. In Hell, your house is Japanese and your wife is American.


5 posted on 03/27/2014 5:14:14 AM PDT by MNDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Moseley

when an individual or organization calls for banning a word,all they are doing is encouraging others to go full force on it it.It’s just like that “Don’t Do That” scenario with children.You know a child will do just the opposite.Now we have millions of guys calling women bossy at work.


6 posted on 03/27/2014 5:18:08 AM PDT by Cruz_West_Paul2016
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stosh

Baba Boxer:You know I have worked very hard for years to be addressed to as Bossy!


7 posted on 03/27/2014 5:19:23 AM PDT by Cruz_West_Paul2016
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Moseley

How easily the left decides that a word should be banned. How arrogant that they think they are entitled to tell the rest of us what we can and cannot say. How clueless that they dont recognize the totalitarian and anti-American nature of their actions.


8 posted on 03/27/2014 5:21:34 AM PDT by Brooklyn Attitude (Things are only going to get worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moseley
Milk Cow Formerly Heifer Formerly
Known As 'Bossy' Known As 'Bossy'


9 posted on 03/27/2014 5:23:54 AM PDT by Iron Munro (The future ain't what it use to be -- Yogi Berra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brooklyn Attitude

i am surprised the term “Take-Out” hasn’t been banned yet, oh wait,the left needs that term during campaign season.


10 posted on 03/27/2014 5:24:37 AM PDT by Cruz_West_Paul2016
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Moseley

“Bossy” is just another way of saying “micro-managerial”.


11 posted on 03/27/2014 5:25:12 AM PDT by Prolixus (We feed; they breed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moseley

More distraction from real world issues.


12 posted on 03/27/2014 5:25:37 AM PDT by VTenigma (The Democratic party is the party of the mathimatically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moseley

I bet these people open paint cans with screwdrivers and pound nails with crescent wrenches.


13 posted on 03/27/2014 5:26:12 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moseley

It’s been a long time since successful men believed in sportsmanship. But then I always worked (in between theater jobs) in the corporate jungle of NYC and Los Angeles where throat-cutting was a daily occurrence. While I could never compete with that kind of behavior and didn’t want to, it did give me the impression that that was how to get ahead.


14 posted on 03/27/2014 5:26:48 AM PDT by miss marmelstein (Richard Lives Yet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moseley

Dictating what words can/can’t be said, banning a word by fiat just seems so BOSSY!


15 posted on 03/27/2014 5:45:43 AM PDT by Anima Mundi (Envy is just passive, lazy greed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

Every time Hillary’s people have mentioned banning the word “bossy” I’ve thought of a fat cow, not her “bossy” ways. Because I don’t think she’s bossy. My mother is bossy. Hillary is a bitchy, conniving, lamp-throwing, sociopathic monster. Should we ban those words?


16 posted on 03/27/2014 6:07:14 AM PDT by miss marmelstein (Richard Lives Yet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Moseley

Earth to Sheryl, you can’t stop me from doing anything at all.


17 posted on 03/27/2014 6:41:13 AM PDT by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moseley

Someone tell me what do they mean by banning the word. Are they trying to enact legislation to make it illegal, punishable by fines/jail or just attempting to make it taboo to use the word?


18 posted on 03/27/2014 7:06:58 AM PDT by CodeJockey (Christian, Freeper, Tea Party Member, Bitter Clinger, Creepy White Cracker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moseley

Bossy b-i itches DEMAND a ban on being called bossy b-i itches.


19 posted on 03/27/2014 7:44:21 AM PDT by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson