Posted on 12/29/2013 7:49:33 AM PST by Nachum
A New York Times investigation has found no evidence to support claims al-Qaeda or any other international terrorist organization had links to the 2012 storming of the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya. The six-part report published Saturday instead blamed the poorly-planned attack on local extremists outraged by an American-made video mocking Islam. The Times refutes claims made by many Republicans that al-Qaeda was involved in the attack despite Obama administration assertions to the contrary. ‘Extensive interviews with Libyans in Benghazi who had direct knowledge of the attack there and its context, turned up no evidence that Al Qaeda or other
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
As the propaganda mouthpiece for the dumBO regime, the Slimes must expect a bailout. The Compost must be extremely jealous.
Wow... well the number two man... the man right under the Ambassador (Chris Stevens) that was killed and raped anally by al qaeda says that the ny slimes is lying... all evidence in the official investigation states that al qaeda and associates were the perps so the ny slimes is just lying for hillary clinton... the MURDERESS of Benghazi.
They find me frustrating. I say: Welcome to the party, pal.
I saw my first Hillary for President bumper sticker last week. GAG!
All the evidence with links need be repeatedly published by every true conservative journalist from now until election 2016.
Cheer up baby ... sez right here in the NYT that it was all about a video. We've got plenty of time to have our friends scrub the actual truth from the net and bingo! What color rug do you want in the oval office for 2016 baby?
Do they (NYT) still hold on to the fantasy that they have any credibility left? Wow.
Wow...
IT WAS A TERRORIST ATTACK!!!
Who gives a damn whether it was AQ or not?!?!?
It certainly had NOTHING TO DO WITH REACTION TO ANY DAMN VIDEO!!!!
And the GOP will accept the lie and be quiet about it from now on.
And in 2016 they’ll wonder why they lost.
Well, of course, because Democrats helping Al-Qaeda would be helping our enemies and that would be treason. So, we just say that Al-Qaeda is no longer our enemy. Sort of like if FDR got caught aiding the Nazis, the Democrats would have to say the Nazis weren’t really our enemies. This is aiding and abetting treason by the paid Democrat liars at the New York Times.
What we are seeing in the media today is a result of repeal of the Smith Mundt repeal – added to the NDAA of 2013.
US Repeals Propaganda Ban, Spreads Government-Made News to Americans
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3043041/posts
http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2013/07/12/us_backs_off_propaganda_ban_spreads_government_made_news_to_americans#sthash.gnLtZODf.dpbs
See post 7 and 10 on thread below
Federally sponsored radio and TV programs coming soon to cable
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3045854/posts
http://www.examiner.com/article/federally-sponsored-radio-and-tv-programs-coming-soon-to-cable
U.S. NEWSCAST IDEA ASSAILED
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3045891/posts
Jan 1946 Newspaper clipping with google website link.
seriously?
They are going back to the ‘outrage over a video’ story??
Michael Corleone: And we have newspaper people on the payroll, don’t we, Tom?
[Tom nods]
Michael Corleone: And they might like a story like that.
Tom Hagen: They might, they just might.
The NYSlimes comes to the libelous defense of their messiah.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.