Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Naval Officer Admits Raping Own Daughter, Navy Promotes Him Anyway
Opposing Views ^ | 12/10/2013 | By Jonathan Vankin

Posted on 12/10/2013 11:52:32 AM PST by Responsibility2nd

As the Pentagon begins a year-long inquiry into why child abuse is rapidly increasing throughout the U.S Armed Services, a Navy officer who sexually abused his own two children was not only given a pass by Navy brass, he got a promotion.

The case was exposed in a recent story in the Virginian-Pilot, a newspaper based in Norfolk, Va., and the details are chilling. Four years ago, according to evidence and testimony amassed by Child Protective Services in Virginia, the Navy lieutenant — who was not named by the newspaper in order to protect the privacy of his traumatized kids — raped his 13-year-old daughter, pinning her to a bed and forcing himself on her after two years of touching her in inappropriate ways.

In the years since the 2009 rape, the girl has suffered severe depression and anxiety, along with suicidal thoughts and a stomach ulcer.

The lieutenant also abused his 10-year-old son, according to the social workers on the case, repeatedly touching the boy’s genitals through his clothes and on one occasion, tying the boy up, duct-taping his mouth shut then forcing him to watch as the lieutenant had sex with a girlfriend.

The lieutenant had separated from his wife, the children’s mother, at the time. When a judge decided that the wife’s allegations of child abuse could hurt the officer’s Navy career, he cited her for contempt of court and ordered her to pay a $5,000 fine, which she can’t afford, or spend 10 days in jail.

Nonetheless, social workers placed the officer's name on the state’s Child Abuse and Neglect Registry and obtained a court order forbidding him from coming within two miles of his children — he has four — until they each turn 18.

The lieutenant signed a document admitting to Child Protection authorities that he committed “Level 2” abuse against his daughter. The social workers accused him of Level 1 abuse, which means that the child suffered “serious harm” as a result. Level 2 means the child endured “moderate” harm.

Despite the evidence, including his own admission, the Navy cleared the officer and let him keep his $96,000 per year job, with a promotion.

In fact, the newspaper examined 1,400 child abuse allegations against U.S. Navy service members and found that the Navy threw out half of them as “unsubstantiated.”

After the Virginian-Pilot story ran, the Naval Criminal Investigative Service opened a new investigation into the abuse allegations against the lieutenant.

In 2011 and 2012, the four branches of the armed forces had 12,881 cases of child abuse and neglect reported, 67 of them leading to the death of a child. More than 750 were sexual assault cases.

In the Navy alone, 42 children died from abuse and neglect from 2008 to 2012. From 2009 to 2012, the Navy had 3,336 child abuse and neglect cases.

In November, the Defense Department announced that it was forming a special working group to investigate the military child abuse epidemic. The group is expected to release its first report in February, part of a projected year-long study.

SOURCES: Virginian-Pilot, Navy Times

 


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: navy; rape
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-107 last
To: Sherman Logan

And we are paradoxically oversensitive about some things while insufficiently sensitive about others.

Some kind of accusation about “inappropriate touching” and then “pinning to a bed” is all we hear. Was this a dirty minded man or one who engaged in external play that some social worker doesn’t like? And is this daughter complaining about it?


101 posted on 12/10/2013 3:45:31 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (The Lion of Judah will roar again if you give him a big hug and a cheer and mean it. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

I filed for divorce against my ex-wife in 2010. Divorced in 2011. A five year old daughter in the mix.

Beginning in December 2011, I have been the recipient of 7 separate allegations of abuse concerning my daughter. 3 or 4 of them were sexual abuse. The other 3 or four were for things ranging from physical abuse because she had a blister on her thumb. Physical abuse because my step-daughter allegedly pushed her out of bed.

On and on it goes, continuing still. All seven allegations were found to be unsubstantiated/unfounded by DSS. I got full custody of my daughter during one of the investigations, when my daughter told DSS that her mother did the following to make her lie about me:

Hit her over the head with a broomstick.
Burned her with a cigarette.
Stuck her head in a toilet.
Withheld food from her.
Locked her in a dark room for hours and hours.

Judges have ruled my ex has “no credibility”

But the accusations keep coming.

And DSS still listens/investigates.

It’s a freaking nightmare. I can’t even begin to tell you how many times DSS has visited, some unannounced, some announced.

Never put anything past a crazy ex.


102 posted on 12/10/2013 3:51:52 PM PST by jsh3180
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

What are the numbers?


103 posted on 12/10/2013 3:57:49 PM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

“”The military child abuse epidemic”
If they are going to call it an “epidemic”, then they should have the numbers to prove it. It’s good to see that you don’t let facts get in the way of your harrumphing on the issue.


104 posted on 12/10/2013 4:05:11 PM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Parmy

Or some satanic book.


105 posted on 12/10/2013 5:02:49 PM PST by TribalPrincess2U (0bama's agenda—Divide and conquer seems to be working.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6
If you were accused of such a crime and were innocent, would you cop to a lesser charge for 'considerations'? I think not. This guy is guilty as hell.

That is all my post was intended to convey. I never called it a "military child abuse epidemic". That is someone else's term that cannot be attributed to me.

Any numbers concerning any other sexual assaults of children are immaterial in deciding this case. No harrumphing. Just focus.

It's good to see that you don't let reading comprehension get in the way of your obfuscation of the issue at hand.

106 posted on 12/10/2013 6:38:42 PM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts ("It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

I’m inclined to agree with you.


107 posted on 12/11/2013 11:19:08 AM PST by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-107 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson