Chris Hayes, or Chris FARLEY?
Posted on 12/04/2013 9:16:15 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
On a break from pretending to believe they live in a country bristling with violent white racists, the Non-Fox Media have been trying to debunk stories about the “Knockout Game,” in which young black males approach random strangers and try to knock them out with one punch.
The left’s leading line of defense against the Knockout Game is to argue that young black males have always been violent, so, hey, this is nothing new.
You’re welcome, black America!
In Slate, Emma Roller wearily recounted other episodes of black-on-white violence in order to announce: “The ‘Knockout Game’ is a myth.”
Reminiscing about the flash mobs that shook many parts of the country a few years ago, Roller wrote: “I remember the summer of 2011, a story about a crowd of (black) teenagers at the Wisconsin State Fair randomly attacking fairgoers went viral as a sign of a burgeoning race war.”
So you see, stupid right-wingers, young black males have always been violent, so what’s the big deal about the Knockout Game? Your honor, my client’s not a killer; he’s a serial killer.
MSNBC’s Chris Hayes reached for a different example of monstrous black-on-white violence in order to dispute that the Knockout Game is anything new.
Looking like a translator for the deaf with all the air quotes he had to make for “supposed” “trend” and “Knockout Game,” Hayes compared it to what he called the fake trend of “wilding” after a mob of black youths violently attacked and raped a white woman jogging in New York’s Central Park in 1989. According to Hayes, “there never was such a thing” as wilding....
(Excerpt) Read more at humanevents.com ...
Pretty much spot on. You have to admire her courage.
Instead, while some blacks have gone forward, many millions more, the black underclass has stagnated and refuses to adapt to the rest of the country. There are a number of reasons why it hasn't, but certainly the encouragement of single black mothers exacerbated the problems.
These knockout pups are not merely stagnates--they are human reverts exhibiting reverse evolution to animals, fit for caging and exhibition, or when caught in the act, termination. And exhibition when terminated.
Wish I could read the article, Vet, but the pop ups and ads are too aggressive.
The knock out game is not new....Its just never gotten national coverage before.
They played in detroit 15 yrs ago.
city centers rot.This game speeds it up.
“knock-out game” is just a euphemism for sucker punches from chicken-s*** punks “of color”. If anything this is going to assist prosecutors trying to decide if a shooting was self-defense or not. A shot to the head can be deadly. I’ve gone from a belly bag to an open holster now that it’s colder so I can clear faster. Stay aware and alert.
Friend of mine was beaten and robbed here 2 months ago...hit with a bottle from behind at his job....had to shave his head to fix it.
They were from somolia.
They were not caught.
I do the same job as him.
I dont carry at work because it wont do much good.
I drive taxi,we dont have passenger barriers.
If I have trouble I plan to put them into the windshield and jump out.?
I agree. The criminals of the black underclass have to be stepped on hard. Harsh action against the criminals would actually help law-abiding black people progress.
But what's holding back the correct action is not only black race-baiters but white libs who refuse to do the right thing not in the Spike Lee way. The election of Di Blasio in NYC is just one more case of white libs literally being too stupid to save themselves.
Ann's gonna knockout liberal elites with facts...
Chris Hayes, or Chris FARLEY?
With all due respect, this is not what I wanted to say.
On principle, the ordinary thief, or hold-up man, or even druggie has some kind of self-seeking motivation in profit or pleasure. We already have our jails full to overflowing with a surplus of black Americans, male and female. That I can understand.
It is the pure terrorism spread by the "knockout game" supporters and perpetrators who have no goal but irrational and unpredictable disruption of society that need termination. These are just as ruinous of mutual trust as were the 9/11 Muslim terrorists. They are not just common criminals. These intend to destroy the very fabric of a free culture, by causing it to be replaced with a police state to suppress terrorism and control everyone's behavior.
That is what I am saying needs drastic and immediately applied measures.
An armed society is a polite society. Gun-free zones are dangerous.
How is saying “needs drastic...measures” different than from what I said? Unless your drastic measures are not the same as mine.
You said:
The criminals of the black underclass have to be stepped on hard.
What I infer from your statement, and the one you made previously to mine, is that all the class from which black criminals come, needs to be stepped on hard. I'm not agreeing with that approach. I say, we need to strongly discipline all criminals, regardless of their genetic inheritance; and react to terroristic acts with certain death, based on the type of act, not because of their culture or skin color.
I hope you haven't missed the point that it's those practicing terrorism, black, white, Muz, Eskimo, chinese, or whatever, that need to be terminated when caught in the act.
Dealing with other kinds levels of criminality can be of lesser consequence, but I do not condone stepping any harder on blacks than anyone else of other genealogy. A Constitutional type of justice needs to be blind to skin color, my friend, in establishing a just society.
Terrorism is meant to uproot the trustworthiness of the citizens in a free, well-regulated, just society. The unpredictableness and violence of human-invoked acts of terror need such an equally fierce but just and certain immediate retribution, that the thought of committing such an act cannot easily take root.
Having to walk the streets in constant fear of one's fellow humans is an unacceptable outcome.
What I meant was the criminals from the black underclass. Yes, step on all criminals. But the criminals going around attacking people, black and white, in American cities are virtually all black. There is no ignoring the fact that a highly disproportional number of black males engage in criminal activities. Unless drastic measures are taken, we are looking at the same problems fifty to one hundred years down the road.
Dr. Ben Carson was from the black "underclass" of Baltimore. Define me an underclass. How do you know that some attacker is not from an "upper class," hm? or a "middle class."
I hate to be a bugger about this, but this seems to have a "upper class white" condescending tone. Maybe you didn't mean it that way? (hopefully)
Are you being facetious? The underclass is the class that has the people who are on welfare and/or commit a tremendous amount of crime. If a person gets pregnant when they’re in their mid teens, gets on welfare, and continues to have children while never getting off welfare, they are members of the underclass. If some person starts committing serious crimes in their early to mid teens, drops out of school, never gets a job and has no plans to get one, they’re a member of the underclass. White or black.
No, not at all. I appreciate your view, and tend that way, but I have to take care and put things on an individual basis, not as people belonging to a "class," so very easy to do, and then wash your hands of it.
I know quite a few people in the situation you describe as a class, but who would rather be otherwise. And I'll tell you, stepping on any and everyone from such origins will not cure the problem. You have to cherry-pick those you are going to condemn, and do it on a personal behavioral basis.
You need to offer a hand up to those who will take it, not a hand-out or the back of your hand indiscriminately. I hope you agree with that?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.