How is saying “needs drastic...measures” different than from what I said? Unless your drastic measures are not the same as mine.
You said:
The criminals of the black underclass have to be stepped on hard.
What I infer from your statement, and the one you made previously to mine, is that all the class from which black criminals come, needs to be stepped on hard. I'm not agreeing with that approach. I say, we need to strongly discipline all criminals, regardless of their genetic inheritance; and react to terroristic acts with certain death, based on the type of act, not because of their culture or skin color.
I hope you haven't missed the point that it's those practicing terrorism, black, white, Muz, Eskimo, chinese, or whatever, that need to be terminated when caught in the act.
Dealing with other kinds levels of criminality can be of lesser consequence, but I do not condone stepping any harder on blacks than anyone else of other genealogy. A Constitutional type of justice needs to be blind to skin color, my friend, in establishing a just society.
Terrorism is meant to uproot the trustworthiness of the citizens in a free, well-regulated, just society. The unpredictableness and violence of human-invoked acts of terror need such an equally fierce but just and certain immediate retribution, that the thought of committing such an act cannot easily take root.
Having to walk the streets in constant fear of one's fellow humans is an unacceptable outcome.