Posted on 11/10/2013 5:08:08 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Link only due to copyright issues: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/11/10/will-sarah-palin-have-a-second-act/3489845/
Link to article: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/11/10/will-sarah-palin-have-a-second-act/3489845/
I’m praying for it, Sarah and Ted are the polar opposites of the imposter and slow. We’re not going to get out of this mess with moderates.
Secretary of the Interior. I guess it is called Natural Resources these days. That should be a perfect fit for Sarah Palin. It would drive the left mad.
she can try, but the media has rendered her unelectable.
“Never say never,” she shrugs when asked if she might run for the Republican nomination against Alaska Sen. Mark Begich
As the story says, Begich is a soft target for 2014. He won in the “year of Baraq” with a limp Clintonian plurality.
That would be a complete waste of one of our two star quarterbacks.
Palin/Cruz 2016
Do you honestly think that after the BO travesty that the media will have any credibility?? Especially as regards SP??
Those who pay attention to the liberal attacks against Palin weren't ever going to vote for a strong patriot to begin with.
She's lost nothing, and remains as popular with the conservative base as ever.
Yes. If all of BO’s transgression still got him re-elected and of the ones that follow don’t seem to matter.
Who’d ever have believed Obama would be elected and reelected?
What a show that would be.
Whatever Sarah does I know it is what G-d wants her to do.
That should bring joy to all of her great supporters, Sarah is lucky to have such Great Freepers to be behind her!
I dunno. Maybe you're right. But Palin a fighter, and much more savvy now after all the punches she's taken, and in a head to head battle with Hillary, I could see her come off much better.
Especially since she will have ample material with which to publicly hang the media for foisting Obama on us, who could be positively radioactive by 2016.
I'm not saying it's likely she'll run, or that she'd be a shoo-in. But I could see it working out very well for her and the nation in Sarah vs. Hillary fight for the presidency. Especially since Hillary will come off as a tired, shrewish old bag.
being popular with a base that is obviously in the minority does not translate to her winning anything.
Don’t get me wrong, I like her, I like the things she says and says what needs to be said. I’d vote for her. I’m just looking at all the circumstantial evidence and the general stupidity of the voting majority. Being practical.
Do you really think she will ever be more than a cabinet officer? Not likely.
I love that picture and find a big smile on my face each time it appears.
Thanks!
Liberals will just start employing all the typical false accusations. She said she can see Russia from her house (no she didn’t), she said Africa is a country (no she didn’t), she didn’t know what the Bush Doctrine was (no one did; it’s an invented term), and so on.
My point exactly. Gun runner, Benghazi and all the rest. Didn’t matter to the voting majority.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.