Posted on 07/09/2013 4:51:37 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
Today, July 9th, is DAY #21 (of 5th week) State of Florida V. George Zimmerman case.
Yesterday was the first full day of defense witnesses. Perhaps the most significant of the first set were the two police officers who stated Tracy Martin, Trayvon’s father, said on 2/28/12 the cries for help on the 911 calls were NOT Trayvon. Later in the day Tracy Martin took the stand and essentially said the two detectives were lying. A great analysis of the events from yesterday is available HERE.
What additionally strikes as important to us is the first signs of desperation from the original nucleus of the Scheme Team construct, Benjamin Crump and Daryl Parks – attorneys for the Martin family. Parks appeared on Piers Morgan show last night and the video should be watched by anyone who knows how the scheme was constructed.
We accept that Mark O’Mara is conflicted in this case, and he is trying to walk a fine line between presenting a defense to a case built on political pressure and outright fraud; Yet simultaneously avoiding exposition of both the politics and the fraud itself.
The intentionally avoided open doors exposing the fraud creates anxiety for those of us who know what is inside the room he is avoiding. Our prayers are that his passing those wide open doors is based on prudence [within an unknown strategy]. However, our fear is the hasty and politically correct avoidance might cause him to pass by the room holding the key to George Zimmerman’s ultimate ‘long-term’ freedom.
It should be noted the NAACP Annual National Convention starts in Orlando on Friday; Additionally, preparations are being made in/around Miami-Dade for a Wednesday defense wrap up with a community/LEO preparation meeting today.
(Excerpt) Read more at wftv.com ...
I notice the ring......bet he is a pip to live with. I can just see him wanting o know why his socks aren’t paired.
O’Mara drew the short straw — he has to stay and listen to this grasshopper — West went home a long time ago — he’s having some soft serve right about now.
no...I’ve prepared court exhibits. it’s really impossible for the creator to create. what it does is add a time element.
My mistake. Should have followed the conversation before posting.
no they don’t in fact, i’d say they were messing with the prosecution...and the judge
I saw a comment on the WFTV blog that basically said “Since this re-enactment is based upon the states witnesses, why are they trying to prevent it from being played for the jury? That ought to tell you something right there!” LOL!
>> I notice the ring......bet he is a pip to live with.
That tired old joke comes to mind:
Q: What does an assistant assistant district attorney use for birth control?
A: His personality.
Ask GZ.
Any exhibit showing TM on top of GZ helps a self defense argument.
that was all the swearing.....
The judge cuts him off to ask MoM a question. She wants to allow this.
Personally, I don’t know why the judge has let this song and dance go on for so long, since she’s probably going to shoot the defense down, anyway. She’s done so since the trial started.
Leni
I’m not hearing Judge Tool wants this animation included as evidence.
Judge is sounding like she is not going to allow the animation to be shown to the jury anyway. So it’s probably been a waste of time.
And I’ll pretend to kiss that smarmy little Mantei mouth.
Book Mark.
>> Personally, I don’t know why the judge has let this song and dance go on for so long, since she’s probably going to shoot the defense down, anyway.
My take is, she’s genuinely interested in this legal technology, in a professional sense, and she’s keenly aware that she could be part of “legal history” for allowing it, or not. So she’d LIKE to do the “right thing”, however she sees it.
Of course, she may STILL rule it inadmissable, since her TENDENCY is to help the persecution.
Well obviously because the animation does more than just draw a picture for the jury, but makes it into a movie that they could and would understand re: what actually happened according to previous testimony. Can’t have that!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.