Judge is sounding like she is not going to allow the animation to be shown to the jury anyway. So it’s probably been a waste of time.
He’ll use this in closing argument if not allowed as evidence
>> So it’s probably been a waste of time.
Maybe.
My bet is, she’ll allow the defense to use it during their closing argument.
Actually, keeping one ear to the courtroom action: she has a (legal) point with her concern that the jury could apparently take it into the deliberation room and play it “over and over” and thus make the animation the “bible” of the actual events.
the problem with the animation is this. Mom asked if a new animation could be ready tomorrow to appease the court he said no. But with more time a new animation could be made! the amimation should have been made and been evidence from day one from witnesses.
In essence a new animation could made with new aspects! An animation could be made to show GZ could have shot TM anytime he was hovered over GZ.
Prosecution could have animation that could show TM was shot anytime in the crouched position and GZ inflict his own wounds! And Animation can show anything when not based on testimony. If the court wanted this video it would have been contracted by the court, with testimony.