the problem with the animation is this. Mom asked if a new animation could be ready tomorrow to appease the court he said no. But with more time a new animation could be made! the amimation should have been made and been evidence from day one from witnesses.
In essence a new animation could made with new aspects! An animation could be made to show GZ could have shot TM anytime he was hovered over GZ.
Prosecution could have animation that could show TM was shot anytime in the crouched position and GZ inflict his own wounds! And Animation can show anything when not based on testimony. If the court wanted this video it would have been contracted by the court, with testimony.
Now the phone and Mr Connor —
the fighting issue verified by texts on phone
I know. And the animation is probably thrown out by this judge.
But NOW this ahole judge is trying to keep defense from putting Connor on the stand for the phone records and info from TM’s phone. She is trying desperately to throw the case to the state....AS USUAL.