You mean, like, flaming, or...
Well, it's a standard question we have to ask.
No, we're not homosexual, but we are *willing to learn*.
Yeah, would they send us someplace special?
Posted on 04/24/2013 10:38:05 AM PDT by EveningStar
Carla Hale, a teacher in Clintonville, Ohio, was fired just days after an anonymous parent informed the school that her partner's name had appeared in her mother's obituary. Update- April 24, Hale's grievance has been denied.
(Excerpt) Read more at buzzfeed.com ...
Good catch!
Sixth is "Thou shalt not commit adultery". She isn't married.
Eighth is "Thou shalt not bear false witness". She is no proof she ever lied about it.
Seventh is "Thou shalt not steal". She stole nothing.
Seventh is "Thou shalt not steal". She stole nothing.
That depends. If she signed the contract knowing that she was not going to abide by the morality clause of the contract, then any money she received under the contract was received under false pretenses. Thus, she likely did bear false witness and could be considered guilty of theft by fraud.
Why would the male son, pick up “gay vibes” from female lesbians?
The lesbian vibes would not be directed at the son.
Columbus has had its own problems with priests.
The indoctrination would not be just aimed at boys or girls
I hear on the word highjack.
I am very explicit anymore to use the term business partner when describing my associates.
All sex outside of marriage is a mortal sin, a violation of the Sixth Commandment. Scripture isn't ambiguous about that. Being a fornicator prevents you from entering into eternal life and anything that prevents you from entering into eternal life is a mortal sin.
"I wrote to you in an epistle, not to keep company with fornicators. I mean not with the fornicators of this world, or with the covetous, or the extortioners, or the servers of idols; otherwise you must needs go out of this world. But now I have written to you, not to keep company, if any man that is named a brother, be a fornicator, or covetous, or a server of idols, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner: with such a one, not so much as to eat." 1 Corinthians 5:9-11
"Know you not that the unjust shall not possess the kingdom of God? Do not err: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, Nor the effeminate, nor liers with mankind, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor railers, nor extortioners, shall possess the kingdom of God." 1 Corinthians 6:9-10
Living a lie is bearing false witness and accepting payment if she agreed to abide by a morals clause in her contract is theft by fraud.
This person's libido is her god, thus she's violating the First Commandment as well.
They said to him, “Teacher, this woman has been caught in the act of adultery. Now in the Law Moses commanded us to stone such women. So what do you say?” This they said to test him, that they might have some charge to bring against him. Jesus bent down and wrote with his finger on the ground. And as they continued to ask him, he stood up and said to them, “Let him who is without sin among you be the first to throw a stone at her.” - John 8: 4-8
I know, right? We had two of them, who were living together, in our Maryland "junior high school" back in the 60s. But they were creepy and paid too much attention to the girls in the showers. My friends al knew they were gay and most of the kids just sort of ignored them in any area outside of actual gym class, but I can't speak for all the kids, certainly not the weak or vulnerable ones.
The big lumbering masculine lezzy gym teacher tried to get me in trouble for dancing too close with my heterosexual love interest at a school dance -- we were a couple of virgin nerds with very clear intentions to hold off for marriage -- after college. Gym teacher, please!
Our homeroom teacher, a 29-year-old guy who looked so ancient to us at the time, had to get us out of trouble. He made it clear to us by rolling his eyes that he disrespected her hypocrisy for coming after us because of what she thought of as inappropriate sexual behavior. We had a private LOL!
Those were the days before Political Correctness. Today, the homeroom teacher and my friend and I would probably be arrested for overriding her attempt to banish us from the next school dance for being normal heterosexual teenagers.
Columbus has had its own problems with priests.
I don't see there an answer to my question - nor any particular point.
IIRC, the Catholic Church just went through a crapstorm, with disastrous costs, for allowing gay priests around children. Now you want this school to make an emotion-based exception to the rule for a gay woman, and involve the civil government into the mess, potentially having a secular court overrule the Church where it tries to limit the expression of gay behavior among its faculty?
Whose side are you on? She flouted the "don't tell" rule.
You like her personally; so send her a bouquet; find her another job; but leave your Church to do what it has to do. Unless, of course, like her, you don't believe the Church has a right to its own values, and the secular Marxist courts should be able to make an evil precedent out of this case.
bump
exactly right
The only agenda she seems to have is wanting to live her life and do her job without being bothered. She's not marching in the streets or picketing for gay marriage or waving her partner in her student's faces, and if she was then I wouldn't be defending it. She wants to be left alone, to keep her private life private and her work life separate from it. What's wrong with that?
So, you're suggesting that the church ask every job candidate directly whether they are gay or not? Come to think of it, not a bad idea. They could do it on the job application form.
Then post to whitedog57 at post #10 directly and express confidence in his/her son’s opinion.
You mean, like, flaming, or...
Well, it's a standard question we have to ask.
No, we're not homosexual, but we are *willing to learn*.
Yeah, would they send us someplace special?
Gross hypocrisy still doesn't make another sin not a sin. Nice try.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.