Posted on 04/16/2013 1:51:46 PM PDT by MissesBush
Anyone else listening to Sean Hannity's Show and the ABC News breaks during? ABC News is SHAMELESSLY claiming this is the first US homeland terror attack on Obama's watch, a blatant lie and surely they know it. And if they don't, they should go out of the news business. ABC News needs to tell the families of the 13 murdered heros by Hassan the Islamic radical maggot that their loved ones didn't die from terrorism. Or should we assume ABC News is just toeing the Obama line that it was an act of workplace violence and not what it was, terrorism?
What about the shooting and murder of one ROTC recruiter, and the wounding of another by yet another Islamic radical in Little Rock in 2009? And 2 other major terrorist masscres were only averted because of the incompetence of the bombers, not because of the Obama administration's supposed vigiliance: The Times Square bombing and the Detroit airliner bombing. Had either succeeded, Obama's record on domestic terrorism would be considered eggregious. That these attacks all happened, or nearly happened, without the Obama admin detecting and preventing them tells us something is seriously amiss in the Obama admin's handling of terrorism and homeland security. The loss of enhanched interrogations is surely partly to blame. Instead, the shameless imbeciles at ABC Radio News try to tout some sort of illusory Obama triumph on preventing terrorism!
The ABC lapdogs even went so far as to report Clinton's first US homeland terrorist act came within weeks of his being sworn in and Bush's in his first year, but "4 years, 3 months and 25 days" into Obama's presidency as they actually contrasted came Obama's first deadly terrorist attack on US soil as if to say "look at how much better Obama's been on combating terrorism!"
The US news media once again shows itself to be intellectually dishonest and cravenly co-opted. What an embarrassment and what an afront to the brave service people who suffered under the scourge Islamic terror on US soil during Obama's watch, to say nothing of the many who also perished overseas under Obama including especially our Benghazi diplomats.
Are you surprised?
The first 10 don’t count as “terrorist” attacks.
Pray for America to Wake UP
D@MN i forgot about that one. Thank you for reminding me. I thought something was off when they said it.
I consider anyone who serves in the US armed forces and does so honorably at the risk to their own lives, comfort and well-being to be heroic, which is why I characterized them as such, not merely because they were victimized by Hassan.
Obama should be thanking Bush (profusely!) for a legacy of much better national security, than Bush inherited from Clinton.
More and more, we see the wisdom of taking the fight to the jihadis, rather than trying to deal with terrorism as just another law-enforcement issue. The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan sucked up so much of the jihadist’s resources that they couldn’t retaliate in N. America. That’s no longer the case — plus, the militant Islamists have added some more friendly regimes in the mid-east, thanks, in large part, to Obama.
Listen to ABC Radio News every day, hour after hour and you’ll be outraged by what you hear.
Great post and spot on.
Well, it’s not.
ABC - A fully owned Obama subsidiary.
A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical liberal minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.
By spreading this definition around, perhaps we can employ one of the more effective methods of deflating and defeating the fools who practice and promote it: RIDICULE.
Unless stopped and soon PC will DESTROY Western Civilization -- if it hasnt already.
PASS IT ON!!
THEN PASS THE KOOL AID!!
obammy and EVERYONE involved with him are shit
Pretty selective of the media if they only choose to define terrorism as acts against civilians. Convenient. Fort Hood wasn't a battlefield action. If I remember right the shooting occured at a graduation ceremony, not in the middle of a skirmish. Interesting the media, and everyone else, would call the USS Cole attack a "terrorist attack," as well they should. But another attack on US military personnel at Fort Hood is not?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.