A strong shot of Whiskey would do, thank you! On the rocks.
Posted on 02/06/2013 3:53:52 PM PST by Cold Case Posse Supporter
Kathleen O’Leary, Presiding Judge of the 4th District Court of Appeal reinstated the Appeal Taitz v Obama et al filed by the candidate for the U.S. Senate Attorney Orly Taitz.
Appeal at hand involves Senator Diane Feinstein and Barack Obama as a candidate for the U.S. Presidency.
(Excerpt) Read more at scribd.com ...
VOTE “Hillery2016”
The big deal is if he is found ineligible every bill xorder is invalidated immediately.
Order Filed: On January 15, 2013, this court filed an order dismissing the instant appeal because of appellant's failure to designate the record on appeal and for failure to file a Civil Case Information Statement, after notice that appellant was in default. On January 24, 2013, appellant filed a motion to reinstate the appeal. The motion is DENIED without prejudice. The motion is defective for the following reasons, among others: 1) The motion purports to include appellant's notice designating the record on appeal but the notice is internally inconsistent in that appellant has failed to indicate which of the alternative methods she elects to use for the record on appeal. Instead, appellant has checked each of the three alternative forms: a clerk's transcript under rule 8.122, an appendix under rule 8.124 and the original superior court file under rule 8.128. Much of the remainder of the document, which consists of handwritten notations, is illegible. 2) The motion purports to include appellant's Case Information Statement, but the Case Information Statement is incomplete. Appellant has failed to complete section A regarding Appealability, section C regarding Bankruptcy or Other Stay, and section E regarding Service Requirements. 3) Appellant's motion to reinstate the appeal does not contain a proper proof of service. The clerk of this court is directed to include with this order a copy of Judicial Council Form APP-009-INFO "Information Sheet for Proof of Service (Court of Appeal)." Specifically, appellant's proof of service by mail on all court documents must include a statement, made under penalty of perjury, by the person doing the serving (who is not a party). Among other requirements, the proof of service also must state the name of the document being served, the server's home or business address, and the city and state from which the document is being mailed. Appellant is advised that this dismissal will become final as to this court on February 14, 2013, at which time this court will lose the power to vacate, reconsider or modify it. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.264(b)(1).)
I’ve pondered that. It would seem to me that the bills would all still be law by virtue of the fact if not signed or vetoed in N number of days they become law by default. It seems to me that only his vetoes (if any) would be overturned.
But I could be wrong.
Things could get interesting...
Could be very interesting!
Dream on. There are only about 38 Americans left who even know what the fuss is about, or care.
THEY will get to her and her family just like EVERYONE else. People are so clueless (or careless) as to what is going on.
Exactly the reason no judge will ever rule against him. No judge will allow himself to be responsible for that level of disruption and the violent civic chaos to follow. You could offer up a real birth certificate from Kenya with fingerprints and footprints and signed affidavits from the doctor. It wouldn't matter in the slightest.
Never misses an opportunity to miss an opportunity. Why can’t a real attorney, with Orly’s enthusiasm, do things right on this - the most important topic in history?
Seems there were dreamers in 1775 and 1776.
Did Hillary have a face lift while she was having a
“concussion”? She has a he** of a lot less wrinkles than she did just a few months ago.
Thanks for the pings.
I just want the truth. I don’t care by what method or agent it’s exposed.
“What the effin difference does it make now?”
It makes every difference in the world, if it were ultimately successful. It could end up being the best possible outcome. The Federal court decision that Obama was indeed ineligible for the Office would void every bill and law signed into law by the ineligible President and void every appointment made by the ineligible President, including two U.S. Supreme Court Justices. Obamacare would be void, and it would have to be legislated again to become an enforceable law. The executive orders would be voided. How much more can you ask for?
How would Norma McCorvey have felt if the Supreme Court, when hearing Roe v. Wade, said "What difference does it make now? She already had the baby," and decided to not hear the case?
The point is that Constitution issues have to work their way to the Supreme Court regardless of whether or not it's in time for the specific person's specific issue.
-PJ
As can be seen in the judge’s January 15, 2013 dismissal of Orly’s appeal for Orly’s failure to fill out the paperwork properly, the title of this thread is misleadingly incorrect.
There has been NO reinstatement of Orly’s eligibility lawsuit, only a reinstatement of Orly’s APPEAL of the dismissal. The Jan. 15 appeal dismissal would have stood had Orly not corrected all of the deficiencies in her filing of the appeal that the judge noted in comment #23.
Therefore Orly’s underlying eligibility case still stands as dismissed. Only Orly’s appeal dismissal has been reinstated.
Sadly, however, the defects in the underlying case make it almost 100% probable that Orly will lose her reinstated appeal.
A strong shot of Whiskey would do, thank you! On the rocks.
She'll want to run as an incumbent.
Obama impeached.
Biden needs a new Veep.
That would be The Hildabeast.
Biden gets removed per Amendment XXV Section 3 or 4.
Hillary!™ gets two years of unelected presidency, and wants to add two full terms, it will be called The Glorious Hillary!™ Decade...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.