Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Full ...

Gen. Dempsey: If Women Can’t Meet Military Standard, Pentagon Will Ask ‘Does It Really Have to Be That High?’

1 posted on 01/25/2013 10:23:28 AM PST by george76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
To: george76

General Dempsey - why not create an all-female combat unit, and deploy them to someplace like the Korangal Valley?

You will then be able to prove the validity of your theories very quickly.


2 posted on 01/25/2013 10:27:25 AM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

So this is going to be the dumbing-down of the US military.

The 2008 coup continues its systematic destruction of what used to be the United States of America.


3 posted on 01/25/2013 10:27:41 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

Fundamental Transformation, baby. FTU Amerikkka.


4 posted on 01/25/2013 10:27:41 AM PST by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

Call it the Michael Moore Standard. No physical tests shall be more demanding than what Michael Moore could perform.


5 posted on 01/25/2013 10:28:32 AM PST by ImJustAnotherOkie (zerogottago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

Only a day later and they’re already talking about lowering standards to accommodate the new lady grunts.


6 posted on 01/25/2013 10:28:32 AM PST by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

see!

already talk of lower standards.


7 posted on 01/25/2013 10:30:40 AM PST by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama lied .. the economy died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76
"Alright! Listen up you maggots! One of your buddies has been shot. He's lying 50 feet from your foxhole. Your task is to run out there and get him. Drag him to your foxhole and provide medical aid. We will partner up. One of you will be the wounded and the other will be the rescuer. You got that?"
"Sir?"
"Keep it brief little lady, I don't have all day."
"Sir, I can only carry 50 pounds."
"Alright! Listen up you maggots! Someone has dropped a 10-gallon jug of water 50 feet from your foxhole. Your task is to run out there and retrieve that jug. Drag it to your foxhole and take a drink. There will be no partners. This is an individual activity. You got that?"
8 posted on 01/25/2013 10:33:52 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (Nothing will change until after the war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

“What difference does it make?” I guess they are expecting to have less men wanting to join the gay ranks, so they need to fill slots with women.


9 posted on 01/25/2013 10:35:58 AM PST by petitfour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

So the objective is no longer to be the best we can be. The objective is to be diverse and representative first, and to train up to whatever standard does not impinge on diversity goals.

This will get people killed.


12 posted on 01/25/2013 10:38:44 AM PST by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

Um, yes, you idiots.


15 posted on 01/25/2013 10:45:31 AM PST by null and void (Gun confiscation enables tyranny. Don't enable Tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

What sort of mental disorders will result from male soldiers having to watch female soldiers being raped by the enemy? Shame on Panetta for endangering America’s military by promoting these crazy experiments on our soldiers.


16 posted on 01/25/2013 10:46:17 AM PST by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76
"...With the direct combat exclusion provision in place, we never had to have that conversation.”

This guy is in charge?

How is it different to exclude a man who can't meet the standard vs. excluding women who can't meet the standard?
17 posted on 01/25/2013 10:46:23 AM PST by andyk (I have sworn...eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

The term ‘Fox Hole’ will take on a whole new meaning.


19 posted on 01/25/2013 10:47:59 AM PST by Beagle8U (Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

Somewhere in China the generals are smiling.


21 posted on 01/25/2013 10:50:46 AM PST by Trod Upon (Civilian disarmament is the precursor to democide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76
Gen. Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said Thursday that with women now eligible to fill combat roles in the military, commanders must justify why any woman might be excluded – and, if women can’t meet any unit’s standard, the Pentagon will ask: “Does it really have to be that high?”

And, thus begins the final push to wreck what has been the best military in the world.

Kids can't pass their finals to graduate? Lower the standards. Too dumb to get into college? Lower the standards. People too fat to be accepted in the military? Lower the standards. Peaople can't meet the standards required of combat soldiers? Lower the standards.

Since lowering the standards for any institution or requirement that the left wants to destroy is what we do, why have them? Why (Constitution aside) have standards for POTUS, Congress, or SCOTUS? Why have standards for lawyers, teachers, dentists, doctors or engineers? Why bother seeking the best of the best instead of the next person in line? What's wrong with having a president who is 4 years-old (Obama)?

This is just the next step in the destruction of this country. As it stands now, our military has been so deeply cut and is stretched so thin that we would have a hard time defeating the military of Holland.

Ignorant foreign governments still send their military here to learn from us so that, in a future war, we may not only have to fight the enemy, but fight our own tactics and strategies as well. Smart. And, when foreign military students take their training elsewhere such as Russia, China or Germany, will that be a wake-up call for us? I doubt it. We will have lowered the standards so much that no one will understand the implications.

If lowering the standards is the left's answer to everything (including citizenship), why not drop the pretense that we're a real country? Let's drop everything that represents America and just become a giant commune with no rules, no borders and no requirements.

If you can't tell, I am beyond disgusted.

23 posted on 01/25/2013 10:51:14 AM PST by DustyMoment (Congress - another name for anti-American criminals!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

How about letting women serve in ‘combat’ units as soon as we have a female JCS or Secretary of Defense.


24 posted on 01/25/2013 10:52:59 AM PST by Theoria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

Ladies and faggots will now be our frontline defense against the barbarians at the gate.....and all our guns will belong to Holder. Good luck, America!


27 posted on 01/25/2013 11:00:09 AM PST by clintonh8r (Happy to be represented by Lt. Col. Allen West)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

I knew this was coming. I just thought it would take a few days, maybe a week or two. It only took 24 hours.

All of these people, including the traitorous generals at the top, are deliberately eviscerating our military and our Country.


31 posted on 01/25/2013 11:12:54 AM PST by OldMissileer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76
Would Gen. Dempsey like to serve in combat with a woman who cannot do this?


33 posted on 01/25/2013 11:13:35 AM PST by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76
"let me be clear, we’re not talking about reducing the qualifications for a job...

Riiight. That'll last about 15 seconds. Having lived under several regimes of dual-standard, affirmative-action chicanery, I feel well qualified when I say that once you accept the arguement that social justice goals trump reality, you cannot adhere to a high standard for all. Either you drop standards for some, creating a two-tier regime that engenders contempt and hostility, or you drop standards for all, dramatically lowering the effectiveness of the whole organizationm.

Obviously the DOD has bought into the social justice priority. This will lead to an inevitable and ultimately devastating degradation of the whole force.

If I had a child, I would stongly counsel them to forget any notion of serving in this military. Sorry kids, but we done lost the culture war. All that remains is for us to lose the real one, and I fear that is all but inevitable.

34 posted on 01/25/2013 11:13:42 AM PST by SargeK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson