Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
To: hole_n_one
wowsers - things gonna get mighty hot at the WH now.
2 posted on
11/15/2012 4:31:00 PM PST by
Godzilla
(3/7/77)
To: hole_n_one
Well, that will make for a some mighty interesting follow-up questions, won't it?
3 posted on
11/15/2012 4:31:07 PM PST by
mojito
(Zero, our Nero.)
To: hole_n_one
If the word ‘BLACKMAIL’ comes up, it’s a whole new ballgame...
4 posted on
11/15/2012 4:31:46 PM PST by
DoughtyOne
(Hurricane Sandy..., a week later and 48 million Americans still didn't have power.)
To: hole_n_one
Does he even make it to the hearing?
5 posted on
11/15/2012 4:32:29 PM PST by
Drill Thrawl
(We have crossed the line from independence & liberty to dependency & servitude. We are doomed)
To: hole_n_one
I'm left to guess that this “high ranking source” is Petraeus himself?
7 posted on
11/15/2012 4:33:07 PM PST by
mojito
(Zero, our Nero.)
To: hole_n_one
"Petraeus will use his upcoming testimony to amend his previous testimony"
Amend? Weasel wording.
8 posted on
11/15/2012 4:33:43 PM PST by
Paladin2
(FR is STILL way too slow.)
To: hole_n_one
I didnt think this would happen.I thought he would be worried about his wife’s job and his pension.
To: hole_n_one
high-placed source = Petraeus?
He has been sending mixed messages in a varieties of ways from what I understand. I don’t know what is going on, but I wondered on another thread if he has been playing head games with the admin.
To: hole_n_one
If you had two brain cells, and only one of them functioned properly, you knew it was terrorism from the begining. RPG’s were the dead giveaway,
11 posted on
11/15/2012 4:35:30 PM PST by
fhayek
To: hole_n_one
Petraeus also told this source he believed the CIA talking points given to Susan Rice came from within the White House or Administration. Knock me over with a feather.
12 posted on
11/15/2012 4:36:08 PM PST by
mojito
(Zero, our Nero.)
To: hole_n_one
amend?
“Yes Senator, when I said it was sparked by a massive protest because of a Youtube video, I really meant that there was no protest and it was an obvious terrorist attack that had nothing to do with a video...”
Senator: “Thank you for clarifying, I want to congratulate you on a job well done..”
13 posted on
11/15/2012 4:37:02 PM PST by
GeronL
(http://asspos.blogspot.com)
To: hole_n_one
Maybe Patreaus has borrowed Sarah Palin’s b@lls and is going to fight fire with fire. Could get interesting.
16 posted on
11/15/2012 4:38:46 PM PST by
Jane Long
("Miss me yet?" - Mitt)
To: hole_n_one
He should have told the truth before the election.
But hopefully, he comes clean tomorrow.
To: hole_n_one
Well, now Petraeus knows what our own little Hugo Mugabe will do if you cross him.
19 posted on
11/15/2012 4:39:50 PM PST by
aruanan
To: hole_n_one; Ernest_at_the_Beach; ASA Vet; BIGLOOK; STARWISE; neverdem
So will there be a big break on something else after 5 pm on Friday to bury the latest from Petraeus.
21 posted on
11/15/2012 4:39:58 PM PST by
Grampa Dave
(Tagline space for rent to pay for some of my extra taxes the next 4 years!)
To: hole_n_one
Someone’s searching Ft. Marcy Park right now.
23 posted on
11/15/2012 4:40:47 PM PST by
struggle
(http://killthegovernment.wordpress.com/)
To: hole_n_one
In other words, Obama failed in his duties as chief executive and commander in chief to secure the facility as requested and people died. He then ordered his subordinates to lie to cover it up to save his reelection efforts. And no doubt tried to pressure or blackmail Petraeus to remain quiet about it. All impeachable offenses.
24 posted on
11/15/2012 4:40:47 PM PST by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
To: hole_n_one
Duh, he’s not a liar nor retarded.
By the way, I hats his the release what is going to be said before it is said. Hearings are fake enough; I don’t need second-degree fake news.
To: hole_n_one
CNN, Pentagon correspondent Barbara Starr reported that a high-placed source informed her that former CIA Chief David Petraeus will use his upcoming testimony to amend his previous testimony
I'll believe it when I read it.....
26 posted on
11/15/2012 4:41:33 PM PST by
Hot Tabasco
(Jab her with a harpoon.....)
To: hole_n_one
If it’s true it would be both hugh and series. But I’ve seen the media dangle these things before us in the past; when the opposite comes to pass it’s “see, there was nothing at all to the whole thing.”
29 posted on
11/15/2012 4:44:33 PM PST by
Mr Ramsbotham
(Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson