Skip to comments.
Engineer: Star Trek’s Enterprise ship could be built in 20 years at a cost of $1 trillion
Yahoo News-YTech ^
| 5/18/12
| Tecca
Posted on 05/18/2012 12:30:28 PM PDT by Kartographer
Whether you're a Trekkie or not, you have to admit that there's some sense of wonder toexploring the stars and trying to find life on distant planets. Of course, the U.S.S. Enterprise is a fictional ship, but have you ever put in the thought as to what it would take to actually build it, and when we could get it done if we really put in the effort? The man behind the well-researched site buildtheenterprise.org has, and he's determined that a fully functional Enterprise is only 20 years away if we put in the effort.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: chat; stringtheory; treker
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-119 next last
To: Kartographer
Put all liberals on it, give it enough fuel to hit max range, and...
To: ozzymandus
Yeah? Hows that warp drive coming along? Is the transporter room up and running yet? First things first ... we've mastered the Mini-skirt.
42
posted on
05/18/2012 12:56:40 PM PDT
by
Hodar
( Who needs laws; when this FEELS so right?)
To: Kartographer
Why don’t they invent the part about not needing money, first?
43
posted on
05/18/2012 12:58:17 PM PDT
by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: cuban leaf
Not true. We already have better video screens, tablets and computers. Yeah, but you'd never get female crew members to wear those short little skirts.
44
posted on
05/18/2012 12:58:17 PM PDT
by
Colonel_Flagg
(Obama vs. Romney: Zero x Zero = Zero.)
To: Trailerpark Badass
"Put all liberals on it, give it enough fuel to hit max range, and..."
Hit the self-distruct?
45
posted on
05/18/2012 12:58:46 PM PDT
by
Kartographer
("We mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.")
To: Kartographer
I’m sorry this will not be possible as the EPA has banned all mining of Dilithium Crystals.
To: dfwgator
Sorry captain, but we donna have dilithium crystals, nor the cash to make the ship. We’re a wee bit strapped.
47
posted on
05/18/2012 12:59:32 PM PDT
by
oneamericanvoice
(Support freedom! Support the troops! Surrender is not an option!)
To: GSWarrior
To: Hodar
Her skirt’s so short, you can almost see her phaser. I think it’s set to “stun”.
49
posted on
05/18/2012 1:00:59 PM PDT
by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
To: null and void
—We are no more capable of doing this than we are of landing a man on the moon and returning him safely to the earth by the end of the decade...—
We already had the technology. It was a matter of putting the pieces together. Henry Ford also wanted his engineers to produce a V8 and they said it couldn’t be done. But they did it.
This is many more levels of magnitude more difficult.
IOW, it is like telling Galileo that you want him to design a system capable of landing a man on the moon and returning him safely to the earth by the end of the decade. He was really smart, but not that smart.
50
posted on
05/18/2012 1:01:36 PM PDT
by
cuban leaf
(Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
To: Kartographer
Now that’s a stimulus project I might get behind!
51
posted on
05/18/2012 1:01:52 PM PDT
by
sauropod
(You can elect your very own tyranny - Mark Levin)
To: Wally_Kalbacken
No place to plug it in upere!!
52
posted on
05/18/2012 1:04:04 PM PDT
by
SgtHooper
(The last thing I want to do is hurt you. But it's still on the list.)
To: A message
Yeah, but I know a guy.....
53
posted on
05/18/2012 1:04:29 PM PDT
by
Kartographer
("We mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.")
To: blueunicorn6
She can stun my beeber any time she’d like.
54
posted on
05/18/2012 1:04:29 PM PDT
by
wbill
To: ozzymandus
The transporter was “invented” because the writers couldn’t figure out how they were going to land such a goofy looking ship.
55
posted on
05/18/2012 1:05:55 PM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
To: Astronaut
Since you put it that way. :)
56
posted on
05/18/2012 1:06:05 PM PDT
by
EEGator
To: Kartographer
this thing costs less than obamacare over 20 years ?
i’m in. !
57
posted on
05/18/2012 1:06:11 PM PDT
by
stylin19a
(Obama - The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance)
To: BwanaNdege
“communicators” => nextel phones.
Did everyone notice the nextel chirp was remarkably similar to the original communicators’?
58
posted on
05/18/2012 1:07:27 PM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
To: Dr. Sivana
Poor Jupiter 2. A friend of mine told me he saw it at the end of a really hokey soft porn movie.
59
posted on
05/18/2012 1:07:27 PM PDT
by
massgopguy
(I owe everything to George Bailey)
To: cuban leaf
60
posted on
05/18/2012 1:08:12 PM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-119 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson