Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/10/2012 1:11:46 PM PDT by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
To: servo1969

Wimps. Scared of a girl. My son had play against a girl playing wide receiver in football. He knocked her down on a play. He asked if he did anything wrong. I told him “That’s why she’s out there”.


2 posted on 05/10/2012 1:13:55 PM PDT by AppyPappy (If you really want to annoy someone, point out something obvious that they are trying hard to ignore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

What are they, Muzzies?


3 posted on 05/10/2012 1:14:29 PM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

In other news, every future opponent of Our Lady of Sorrows high has added a female to their rosters....


5 posted on 05/10/2012 1:15:36 PM PDT by PilotDave (No, really, you just can't make this stuff up!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

She’s more man than they are. Play the game.


7 posted on 05/10/2012 1:18:54 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

At least they stick to their principles, you have to give them that.


11 posted on 05/10/2012 1:23:50 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (Chen Guangcheng: Gutsy call, Obama /UltraMegaDrippingSarc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969
This seems silly to me. I totally agree when boy wrestlers refuse to wrestle girls, as that involves a great deal of close, physical contact, that is inappropriate, IMO. I could understand not playing against a girl in a sport like basketball, as well, though I'd probably be OK if my son played against one.

But, baseball? There is very, little, physical contact and it would almost never be awkward, much less inappropriate.

Do they allow the boys to play chess or golf against girls?

16 posted on 05/10/2012 1:26:46 PM PDT by Above My Pay Grade (The candidate I vote for will NOT have a CARE after his name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969
Teaching our boys to treat ladies with deference, we choose not to place them in an athletic competition where proper boundaries can only be respected with difficulty.

It's baseball you idiots. Have you never played a co-ed softball or kickball game?

My wife and I play in a co-ed social sports volleyball league, and it's a blast. There's probably more contact in that than in high school baseball.

These are people taking pride in artificial virtue.

17 posted on 05/10/2012 1:27:17 PM PDT by GunRunner (***Not associated with any criminal actions anonymus by the ATF***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969
The conference they play in allows boys and girls on the field. They already played twice in the season, and the boy/girl team won both times[lady sat on the bench].

If the school already knows there is a chance of facing a girl in competition, why then put the team's chance in jeopardy by playing in a boy/girl conference?

18 posted on 05/10/2012 1:28:35 PM PDT by Theoria (Rush Limbaugh: Ron Paul sounds like an Islamic terrorist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

Our Little League is co-ed. By my son’s age, 10, there are only a couple of girls left, but they are welcome to play. It’s by their own choice that they migrate over to the Girls Softball League.

I’ve never seen anything during a game that would cause an indelicate problem.


22 posted on 05/10/2012 1:36:47 PM PDT by married21 (As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969
Baseball is only very occasionally a contact sport.

It is if you play to win.

23 posted on 05/10/2012 1:38:09 PM PDT by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

I am glad they stuck to their principles, nice to see someone will.


24 posted on 05/10/2012 1:38:14 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

Good for them! For not giving in to the feminazi agenda.


38 posted on 05/10/2012 2:09:02 PM PDT by TheDon (The Democrat Party, the party of the KKK (tm))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

I shake my head at the absolute primitivism posted on this thread (6, 19, and 31 for example). Hard to tell you folks apart from the radical islamists.


40 posted on 05/10/2012 2:15:54 PM PDT by Flightdeck (If you hear me yell "Eject, Eject, Eject!" the last two will be echos...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

The idea that men and women are interchangeable cogs is Marxist. That’s why she’s out there. I would refuse to participate in teaching my sons that.


41 posted on 05/10/2012 2:16:46 PM PDT by Varda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

If it were high school wrestling, I might agree with it but baseball???


43 posted on 05/10/2012 2:17:39 PM PDT by Graybeard58 (Romney vs. Obama? One of them has to lose, I'll rejoice in that fact, whichever it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969
We had a chick playing on our intramural basketball team in college in the early '70's.

We would put her in at low post whenever the opposing team made the mistake of going to a man-to-man defense. She had one move and we had one play for her. She would get the ball low with her back to the basket, the rest of us would head for the corners, taking the defenders away, she would fake one way while hooking the opposite leg behind the defender, go the other way, bounce the ball once heading to the basket and execute the most beautiful finger-roll spinning layup you have ever seen.

She was only good for about 3 buckets that way before the other team would figure out they needed to sink in to defend against her, but she provided the winning margin a number of times.

We all had a lot of respect for her and provided triple-damage to anybody who messed with her on or off the court.

44 posted on 05/10/2012 2:18:35 PM PDT by elkfersupper ( Member of the Original Defiant Class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

They are taking a stand based upon their principles and accepting the consequences of their actions—taking it their forfeiture like men. Good for them.


45 posted on 05/10/2012 2:18:56 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Tagline For Sale)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969; a fool in paradise

47 posted on 05/10/2012 2:19:29 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

What does the school principle think of the team’s principals?


49 posted on 05/10/2012 2:21:49 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969
an traditionalist church that broke away from Roman Catholic Church

This is false. The SSPX is not a separate church. Neither it nor its followers have broken away from the Catholic Church.

56 posted on 05/10/2012 2:28:59 PM PDT by Romulus (The Traditional Latin Mass is the real Youth Mass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson