[AppyPappy]

Wimps. Scared of a girl. My son had play against a girl playing wide receiver in football. He knocked her down on a play. He asked if he did anything wrong. I told him “That’s why she’s out there”.

[dfwgator]

We had girls on my Little League, they were good, too.

[kingu]

A wimp would be someone who compromised their moral beliefs to suit the needs of the moment. They stuck to their guns, even though it was costing them the championship. If that is ‘wimpy’, I can only hope that far more people will be wimpy in the future.

[Dr. Sivana]

Wimps. Scared of a girl.

No. No more than the 90% of males in the 1950s and earlier who would have taken the same position. The most of girls of those eras would not have been too impressed with a girl playing on the boys team either.

You may not share those values, but it is disingenuous to try to taunt them into abandoning them.

[RMDupree]

I dunno, Appy. It sounds more like the school doesn’t want to compromise one of its core principles and would rather forfeit the game (ie, give the win to the other team) than do so.

Personally, I think it is silly to give up a championship over it but kudos to them for putting their money where their mouth is.

[savagesusie]

This has nothing to do with excellence in women athletes. it is all about radical egalitarianism—Marxist ideology that is trying to destroy the Laws of Nature and the Constitution which is based on Objective Truth—that males and females have different natures and need to be admired and respected for their very natures. it dehumanizes both men and women and destroys respect and dignity of the sexes.

Women, by nature, are nurturers—designed by God to have babies and make them emotionally healthy so they will flourish. Men were designed to protect the family and provide for the woman so she could care for the babies. For thousands of years, women and children did not make it if there was no man to champion them.

Marx hates patriarchy and needs to eliminate men who protect their families. It destroys children. Children who grow up with no caring father end up in prison or in gangs. 95% of all prisoners in the 1980’s had abusive or no fathers while growing up.

Marx knew to destroy the family they have to pit man against women—just like class and race warfare—there is a sexes one too—as well as parents against children-—classic socialist use to destroy all trust in a people.

Whittaker Chambers explains the lack of Trust in Communism—in families.

Having men compete against women conditions them to hurt women—which used to be unmanly and evil until this Marxist push to make women into men and force them into the workplace so children’s minds can be shaped by the State and strangers. (70’s is when this sick idea took root. Marxists renamed Daycare to “preschool” to think children would be smarter being around other two year olds to learn speech and good manners. It is a joke and was the beginning of mass dumbing down although the socialist Dewey actually started in the 30’s with destroying morality and traditions.

When you are hurting women in sports—it is conditioning into a mindset that makes it acceptable. Christian Ethics can never condone men hurting women even in sports, because of the extreme difference in strength.

Marxists want women in combat to destroy the protective nature of men and destroy the nurturing aspect in women. Marx denied Natural Law Theory which is the basis of our legal system.

[Yashcheritsiy]

Wimps. Scared of a girl.

I highly doubt that.

I plan to teach my son(s) that women are to be treated with respect, unless they otherwise show they shouldn't be.

I also intend to let them know that if they're every playing a sport, and a girl is playing too, that qualifies as "otherwise show they shouldn't be" and feel free to charge, tackle, or whatever else you would otherwise do to a male player. If she gets hurt in the process, that's on her head, not theirs. If she wants to play little miss tough jock instead of acting like a lady, then it's her own fault when she gets mangled while playing with members of a gender which statistically is faster, stronger, and more aggressive than hers is.

All the same, if it is the conviction of the St. Pius team members not to play a girl, then that's their decision, and I don't fault them for it.

[Mrs. Don-o]

It's clear you disagree with their values, which stress deferential behavior of boys toward girls. That's fine. I myself would argue that baseball is not ordinariky a big body-on-body sport --- not like, say, wrestling --- and playing girls wouldn't involve morally compromising contact. I'd disagree with this school policy, and explain why.

But it's not honest to conclude that they're "wimps... scared of a girl." They're sacrificing rather than compromise what they think is right. People who mock insead of ague makes me wonder whether whether they could actually frame an effective argument.

[Joshua Marcus]

Is your real name David Savage, you are despicible,and I guess your son is only capable of playing with girls; what a team you all are.

[MHGinTN]

Try reading the whole story. You missed the point entirely.

[Mears]

I have 3 sons and 2 daughters.

I had one superb athlete.

It was a daughter.