Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Support Myth Obamney? I SAY "HELL NO!" (VANITY)
self | May 3, 2012 | Neil E. Wright

Posted on 05/03/2012 8:47:24 PM PDT by Neil E. Wright

"We don't intend to turn the Republican Party over to the traitors in the battle just ended. We will have no more of those candidates who are pledged to the same goals as our opposition and who seek our support. Turning the Party over to the so-called moderates wouldn’t make any sense at all." -- President Ronald Reagan

There has been a lot of discussion on this forum on whether or not a "conservative" can or should support Mitt Romney in the general election.

I am 60 years old, and for all of my adult life, since I joined the U.S. Navy at age 17, I have fought the EVIL ideology that is socialism/marxism/communism/statism, call it what you will. And it IS EVIL. It destroys the human spirit. It reduces every individual to a state of hopeless dependence on an all powerful state, run for the benefit of a few favored, powerful, connected people.

We all KNOW that B. HUSSEIN O. is a communist, and truth be told, an islamist supporter. So, he MUST be defeated and destroyed, along with his ideology.

However, myth obamney is also a "progressive" (read COMMUNIST), BY HIS OWN WORDS.

His actual record is indistinguishable from B. HUSSEIN O.

"If we must have an enemy at the head of Government, let it be one whom we can oppose, and for whom we are not responsible, who will not involve our party in the disgrace of his foolish and bad measures." - Alexander Hamilton

Therefore, I will NOT vote for a socialist/marxist/communist/statist, REGARDLESS of party label. I WILL NOT VOTE FOR myth obamney in November. I will vote for the Constitution Party candidate, Virgil Goode, or I will write in my DOG over EITHER major party candidate, because they are EXACTLY the same.

Before you start to flame me, ask yourself this: IF myth somehow is elected, do you REALLY expect him to roll back ANYTHING that B. HUSSEIN O. forced on us? ObamaCare??? That is RomneyCare. EPA rules and regulations? Labor relations rules and regulations that empower unions? Energy policy? IS THERE ANYTHING that the rooster-sucking, goat-humping statist socialist/communist Myth Obamney will eliminate? I would suggest that his whole f**king record says not only "no" but "HELL NO!" There is NOTHING he would change.

So, for all the myth obamney lurkers, go back to your f**king candidate and tell him I said he can take his "God in waiting" cult beliefs, his f**king "magic underwear" and his f**king communism and GO STRAIGHT TO HELL!

“Where liberty dwells, there is my country." –Benjamin Franklin

Islam Delenda Est!

REFUSE. RESIST. Do NOT Submit! ★ FREEDOM! ★



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 2012; elections; mitt; obama; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 281-300 next last
To: FlyVet

“If I stay home, it will be the first time I ever did that, since I started voting in 1976.”

And this time, after Obama gets re-elected and drives the final nail into America’s coffin, you can brag to your great-grandchildren what a genius you were.


221 posted on 05/04/2012 5:18:37 AM PDT by Do Not Make Fun Of His Ears (Anyone who thinks we can sit home, then survive four more years of Obama, is a damned fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: One Name

“I’m writing in Sarah Palin.”

Yeah, that’ll send a message. Not.


222 posted on 05/04/2012 5:23:22 AM PDT by Do Not Make Fun Of His Ears (Anyone who thinks we can sit home, then survive four more years of Obama, is a damned fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144
Because it is not a conservative party. It is only intended to look like one.

Bingo.

What the ABOs fail to understand is that if they want their red-clad statist to defeat the blue-clad statist, they need us a heck of a lot more than we need them.

223 posted on 05/04/2012 5:23:34 AM PDT by Colonel_Flagg (Obama vs. Romney: Zero x Zero = Zero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: precisionshootist

“Sorry to sound so harsh but come on guys. We can’t afford to give Obama four more years to destroy this country. What if Obama wins AND gets the congress back?”

Kudos....even Obama light is better than what we have. God help us.


224 posted on 05/04/2012 5:31:34 AM PDT by Dudoight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: sand88

Hopefully, the GOP will dissolve as a party after 2012. Let the RINOs go home to the RATs and let the Conservatives take over.


Yes to that!!!


225 posted on 05/04/2012 5:42:40 AM PDT by unkus (Silence Is Consent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Neil E. Wright; Jim Robinson
This is the vicious cycle we are on as a party.

When the democrats move left, the "center" moves left with them. Then we leave it up to Republicans like Mitt Romney to move to the new "center." See what's happening? THIS IS HOW THE LEFT WINS EVEN WHEN THEY LOSE.
226 posted on 05/04/2012 5:49:16 AM PDT by libdestroyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr

Reagan’s quote at the top of this thread is about the GOP, not the democrats. He worked within the party to change it.
___________________________________________________

Exactly

It was against George Romney and his moderate buddies who had betrayed Barry Goldwater and the Conservatives in 1964

Wee Willie Mitty was there and watched and learned from Daddy...

Deja Vu

“We don’t intend to turn the Republican Party over to the traitors in the battle just ended. We will have no more of those candidates who are pledged to the same goals as our opposition and who seek our support. Turning the Party over to the so-called moderates wouldn’t make any sense at all.” — President Ronald Reagan


227 posted on 05/04/2012 6:03:16 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana (Why should I vote for Bishop Romney when he hates me because I am a Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Vote Against Both!


228 posted on 05/04/2012 6:50:22 AM PDT by reaganaut (VAB! Voting against both Romney and Obama. Constitution party, here I come!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: caww; Windflier

(cue Twisted Sister’s “We’re Not Gonna Take It!”)


229 posted on 05/04/2012 6:51:16 AM PDT by reaganaut (VAB! Voting against both Romney and Obama. Constitution party, here I come!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: eastforker; One Name; Windflier; caww; Tennessee Nana

I do not need a bible to tell me right from wrong.

- - - - -
Then you do not truly know right from wrong.


230 posted on 05/04/2012 6:54:51 AM PDT by reaganaut (VAB! Voting against both Romney and Obama. Constitution party, here I come!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: Neil E. Wright
I've got to disagree here. I'm a "rabid conservative" and, if I had my preference, Sheriff Joe Arapio would be the Republican Party Candidate for President.

The battle that the author is talking about is the battle for the nomination - and that is pretty much over. During the primaries you get to fight for your perfect candidate.

Now is the time for supporting the winner of the primaries, and focusing attention on getting a better candidate on the Republican ballot in future elections.

Now is also the time for focusing on races in the House and Senate.

Now is also the time for starting to communicate to Romney that he's better tow the f'ing line.

Now is *NOT*, however, the time to stomp one's feet on the ground, and take one's ball and go home.

We're engaged in a battle in which there will never be a perfect outcome, and in which there will never be total victory.

William Shakespeare said it best:

"Rather proclaim it, Westmoreland, through my host, That he which hath no stomach to this fight, Let him depart; his passport shall be made And crowns for convoy put into his purse:..."

231 posted on 05/04/2012 7:26:32 AM PDT by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Duke
You aren't going to make the GOP "tow the line". It's going to move further left because people will vote for whatever R they foist off on the electorate.

Can't do it. I won't be voting for Romney. I can't vote for a pro-abort, gun-banning, big government liberal.

/johnny

232 posted on 05/04/2012 7:40:48 AM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: gusty

You can’t blame me for Obama. I didn’t vote for him the first time, I didn’t vote for his twin in the primary and I won’t be voting for EITHER of them (thus not helping or hurting either one) in the general.


233 posted on 05/04/2012 7:53:44 AM PDT by cableguymn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: eastforker
And when most everyone is gone, who’s gonna pay the bills?

If the price of maintaining this website is the surrender of every core value we hold dear, then it's time to turn out the lights.

Personally, I think Jim Rob could bounce every single Mittbot out of here, and FR would go on as before.

234 posted on 05/04/2012 8:00:50 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
If Romney has leftist core principles, this assertion makes sense. If no core principles, it makes no sense.

The only core principles Mitt has, are those that concern Mitt. The man is simply a sell-out to his countrymen. It just so happens that his transgressions against the greater good, align precisely with the leftist agenda. He would have sold out to the right, if the political conditions had been reversed.

235 posted on 05/04/2012 8:09:02 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

So that is what it’s come down to?

Supporting the flip flopper because he might flip to your side on an issue and then HOPE he stays there....

No thanks.


236 posted on 05/04/2012 8:15:45 AM PDT by cableguymn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Windflier
The only core principles Mitt has, are those that concern Mitt. The man is simply a sell-out to his countrymen. It just so happens that his transgressions against the greater good, align precisely with the leftist agenda. He would have sold out to the right, if the political conditions had been reversed.

You may well be correct about this. But, I'd suggest that the political conditions for him have reversed. He's no longer seeking to govern the most liberal state in the country, and is seeking to govern a country with a center-right majority. That fact, which puts him in opposition to Obama and needing conservative (or at least not liberal) support to survive in office, means that circumstances will be pushing him farther to the right.

If that's how circumstances force him to run and govern, I'll take that in a heartbeat over the guy we know is 1) committed to true leftist values, and 2) dependent upon support from the left of rhis political survival.

To paraphrase, Mitt Romney may be a b*stard, but he's at least our b*stard now.

237 posted on 05/04/2012 8:16:04 AM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

And that was the only point I wished to bring out. Everybody agrees that this November is shaping up to bring Americans an abysmal choice for president (no third party has any hope of being anything but a spoiler). In that abyss, I’d still rather get a politician who “might” yield to a conservative-leaning majority for the sake of his own pride or whatever, than one who is single mindedly bent on evil. If anything is desperate here, it’s the situation of the entirety of America. America right now needs to worry about just surviving, not being great.


238 posted on 05/04/2012 8:16:04 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Away with them and the high horses they rode in on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Don’t forget with Romney there is that ever so important Obama THIRD term to worry about as well.


239 posted on 05/04/2012 8:16:47 AM PDT by cableguymn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: INVAR
It's as if Conservatives today are going to become a modern political version of Germany's Jews from the 1930's. Creating a climate of fear and accusation if one does not go along with the pogrom. It's how an entire people are herded into seig-heiling a system of absolute despotism, for the greater good - as it's ALWAYS marketed.

That is a very good analogy.

Others have used similar imagery to remark that the Jews and other good Germans missed their opportunity to stand up against Hitler and the Nazis when they had a chance. Instead, they were so civilized, and acclimated to a well-ordered society, that they simply could not believe that real tyranny was upon them. It didn't become real to them, until the SS began hauling people out of their homes, never to be seen again.

Right up until that very moment, those among them who were sounding the alarm, were ridiculed and shouted down. It's not unlike what the Mittbots and other enablers are doing on this forum.

240 posted on 05/04/2012 8:19:10 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 281-300 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson