BROKERED CONVENTION!
Posted on 04/10/2012 12:29:15 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
More SOS...
The doom and gloom rhetoric that we MUST vote for Romney otherwise Obama will win and he will declare himself dictator for life, and will end life as we know it and blah, blah, blah.
I hate Obama, but if we have to choose between a lame-duck Obama, and a RINO with similar agendas, then yeah. I’ll gladly tell the RINO party to go to Helll; hope the midterms bring in real conservatives; and wait for 2016.
Romney’s socialism is just as deadly as Obama’s. Maybe worse. At least the Republicans will try (or pretend to try) to fight off Obama’s. They’ll happily go along with Romney. Don’t look now but Romney has your children’s futures all planned out for them, just like Obama. They have nothing to fear. One way or the other, the government will take care of them. Cradle to grave.
The best play is to work for the defeat of Obama — even at the price of Romney becoming president. In office, Romney would do much that disappoints and angers us, but he will be susceptible to pressure from the right and from the GOP caucus.
BROKERED CONVENTION!
We're still in the anger phase. Bargaining, depression and acceptance will follow.
I know lots of people who refused to vote for the media's favorite "maverick" John McCain last time around because he wasn't a conservative. They all regret it now. All of those people will crawl over broken glass to vote for Willard this time just have a chance of ejecting Hussein from the White House.
We have a 2 party system with no chance of coalition government. That being the case, we will almost always have to vote for the proverbial lesser of 2 evils. It is what it is. For most of us, Ronald Reagan will be the only national level, general election candidate we will ever vote for that we were truly excited about (and had a real chance to win). Sadly, I was too young to vote in 80' and 84' and have had nothing but mushy moderates and RINO's to vote for.
____________________________________
How about you think for yourself. You may reach the same conclusion but it will be yours.
f Romney wins Tuesday and garners the nomination, should the Tea Party field a candidate?
January 27, 2012 8:03:17 PM PST · 171 of 178
Jim Robinson to RedStateRocker
There’s absolutely no way I will ever vote for or support that abortionist/statist paper hanging son of a bitch Myth Romney!! That clear enough for you?
Pretty much the same way I'll feel when and if Romney does the same thing, just like he did in Massachusetts.
Now you all know how I felt when Michelle Bachman got out.
I do think that Mitt will appoint conservative judges and justices...he knows which way the political winds are blowing...as to his everyday agenda..his programs...the GOP will win the Senate, and the Senate GOP caucus will be more conservative...we keep the House, and whether we gain or lose a few seats..and I thin we will gain a few..the Hosue GOP caucus is definitely going to be far more conservative...redsitricting has seen to that..so I’m optimistic about the legislative agenda..
You don’t study history much do you? RINOS and their policies don’t win presidential elections. PERIOD. EVERY freeper could vote Romney in November and he still won’t beat Obama. It’s only an “I told you so” situation because the vast majority of freepers know their history and have sense enough to know he won’t beat Obama. It’s really very simple. So you just get in line like a good little soldier and do what the Republican elitists tell you. Jokes on you though, because the establishment doesn’t give a crap about beating Obama or else they wouldn’t be shoving a loser down our throats.
“Victory tends to go to the smartest, not the most stubborn.”
I agree.
I've read articles this morning that Newts running around making comments that suggest he’z just about done.
Making nice nice with the Romney camp and suggesting Romney's more than likely the nominee on some talk show.
Have you not seen these articles? Gingrich is apparently running on empty as far as his war chest. Laying off staff and the whole shah-bang.
He may not be in the race come May 29th.
Agreed in total. Which is why I am still praying for Newt. With the right V.P. I think he could swing it. It is going to be close regardless, due to many different factors, but I think once Newt started going one on one with 0, enough folks would come around. Further, if he became the nominee, it would be a whole lot harder for the media to silence him, and when people have the opportunity to actually listen to the man, they would know he is the right one for the job.
May God guide our course.
Tatt
______________________________________
Umm..if BHO were to be re-elected it would indicate that there is no conservative majority.
THAT should have been done during the off year with the man's failing to prove his eligibility. We're in a different nation now. Now it's American until proven otherwise. Obama's not going anywhere even if the God-Father of ObamaCare were to actually win the election. Obama's here to stay. Guaranteed he'll still be President after Jan 20th 2016.
The damage has been done. We cannot pick and chose which parts of the US Constition are to be enforced and which parts are to be ignored. But that's exactly what we did.
Cheers!
I’m increasingly skeptical
that voting makes a significant difference.
There’s too many proven ways they have and can manipulate the figures.
All the more so with one globalist family producing the voting machines that have proven easily hackable.
I remember back when I was in High School when JFK ‘won’ the SElection . . . I felt then that things were rigged . . . as was later proven . . . his dad bought sufficient Chicago votes to put him in and Nixon refused to contest the vote. That was the first SElection I was old enough to bother much about.
Things have gotten ENORMOUSLY WORSE since then.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.