Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama's Executive Order Authorizes Peacetime Martial Law
New American ^ | 3-18-12 | Joe Wolverton, II

Posted on 03/19/2012 5:35:58 AM PDT by Mikey_1962

President Barack Obama issued an Executive Order on March 16 giving the White House absolute control over all the country’s natural resources in case of a natural disaster or during a time of war.

In the order, the National Defense Resources Preparedness Order, the President granted to himself the authority to approve the dispensing of all domestic energy, production, transportation, food, and water supplies as he deems necessary to protect national security.

Despite the national defense hurdle that ostensibly must be jumped in order for the order to take effect, the text of the document itself does not limit implementation to a time of war. In fact, the specific sections of the order make it clear that the President can take complete command and control of the country’s natural resources in peacetime, as well.

In fact, the President can invoke the powers of this order to “meet national defense requirements” in “the full spectrum of emergencies.” The relevant sections read:

Section 101. Purpose. This order delegates authorities and addresses national defense resource policies and programs under the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended (the "Act").

Sec. 102. Policy. The United States must have an industrial and technological base capable of meeting national defense requirements and capable of contributing to the technological superiority of its national defense equipment in peacetime and in times of national emergency. The domestic industrial and technological base is the foundation for national defense preparedness. The authorities provided in the Act shall be used to strengthen this base and to ensure it is capable of responding to the national defense needs of the United States.

Sec. 103. General Functions. Executive departments and agencies (agencies) responsible for plans and programs relating to national defense (as defined in section 801(j) of this order), or for resources and services needed to support such plans and programs, shall:

(a) identify requirements for the full spectrum of emergencies, including essential military and civilian demand;

(b) assess on an ongoing basis the capability of the domestic industrial and technological base to satisfy requirements in peacetime and times of national emergency, specifically evaluating the availability of the most critical resource and production sources, including subcontractors and suppliers, materials, skilled labor, and professional and technical personnel;

The underlying legal authority for the execution of such a radical order is found in the Defense Production Act of 1950, the President claims. That law combined with the rights vested in him as Commander in Chief of the U.S. Armed Forces supposedly empowers the President to endow himself with these expansive powers.

Just how expansive are the claimed powers and what resources are included in their scope? Livestock? Yes. All food “resources” and “resource facilities?” Yes. Veterinary clinics? Yes. All forms of energy? Yes. Will the President control the water supply? Yes.

Read on:

Sec. 201. Priorities and Allocations Authorities. (a) The authority of the President conferred by section 101 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2071, to require acceptance and priority performance of contracts or orders (other than contracts of employment) to promote the national defense over performance of any other contracts or orders, and to allocate materials, services, and facilities as deemed necessary or appropriate to promote the national defense, is delegated to the following agency heads:

(1) the Secretary of Agriculture with respect to food resources, food resource facilities, livestock resources, veterinary resources, plant health resources, and the domestic distribution of farm equipment and commercial fertilizer;

(2) the Secretary of Energy with respect to all forms of energy;

(3) the Secretary of Health and Human Services with respect to health resources;

(4) the Secretary of Transportation with respect to all forms of civil transportation;

(5) the Secretary of Defense with respect to water resources; and

(6) the Secretary of Commerce with respect to all other materials, services, and facilities, including construction materials.

(b) The Secretary of each agency delegated authority under subsection (a) of this section (resource departments) shall plan for and issue regulations to prioritize and allocate resources and establish standards and procedures by which the authority shall be used to promote the national defense, under both emergency and non-emergency conditions. Each Secretary shall authorize the heads of other agencies, as appropriate, to place priority ratings on contracts and orders for materials, services, and facilities needed in support of programs approved under section 202 of this order.

(c) Each resource department shall act, as necessary and appropriate, upon requests for special priorities assistance, as defined by section 801(l) of this order, in a time frame consistent with the urgency of the need at hand. In situations where there are competing program requirements for limited resources, the resource department shall consult with the Secretary who made the required determination under section 202 of this order. Such Secretary shall coordinate with and identify for the resource department which program requirements to prioritize on the basis of operational urgency. In situations involving more than one Secretary making such a required determination under section 202 of this order, the Secretaries shall coordinate with and identify for the resource department which program requirements should receive priority on the basis of operational urgency.

(d) If agreement cannot be reached between two such Secretaries, then the issue shall be referred to the President through the Assistant to the President and National Security Advisor and the Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism.

(e) The Secretary of each resource department, when necessary, shall make the finding required under section 101(b) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2071(b). This finding shall be submitted for the President's approval through the Assistant to the President and National Security Advisor and the Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism. Upon such approval, the Secretary of the resource department that made the finding may use the authority of section 101(a) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2071(a), to control the general distribution of any material (including applicable services) in the civilian market.

That’s right. The last line of the quoted material gives the President of the United Staes the power to “control the general distribution of any material (including services) in the civilian market.” This seems to be no less than the nationalization of all food, energy, water, and healthcare pipelines and providers in the country. And to help him keep tabs on all this responsibility, he assigns a cabinet member to each category of control.

Presidents have issued similar orders in the name of national defense. For example, during the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln famously (infamously) suspended habeas corpus and the rights to an impartial trial as protected by the Sixth Amendment.

Then, during World War I, President Woodrow Wilson, frustrated with Congress’s reluctance to grant him a full panoply of power over natural resources, invoked the powers given him under an executive order to assume absolute and unilateral authority over the same range of resources as are included in President Obama’s latest fiat.

As any student of history can testify, when government begins to interfere with the free flow of goods and commodities (especially life-giving resources such as food and water), then it may manipulate the availability of these items, as well as the prices thereof. Typically, such fluctuations result in civil disturbances and a demand for greater security from those unwilling to abide by the new “laws.” And, in exchange for greater security, those clamoring for it are often willing to give up their fundamental freedoms.

The White House has issued no statement regarding the purpose for the signing of this Executive Order. There is no accompanying explanation of why this power should be placed before the President at this time — or at any time for that matter. Is it in place to prepare for expansion of the hostilities in the Middle East, or is it something to do with his vaunted algae initiative?

Perhaps the President is taking the first few steps necessary to cloak himself in the powers required to "legally" (albeit unconstitutionally) step outside the boundaries of his constitutional authority and ascend to a level of supervision witnessed in all the former republics of history just before their devolution into mobocracy and mayhem.


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: 2012; banglist; bhofascism; cwii; democrats; donttreadonme; govtabuse; lping; nazicrats; nobama2012; obama; policestate; rapeofliberty; socialistdemocrats; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last
To: Mikey_1962

The Second Amendment appears to be the only cure we have left. Look for a (another) move against it very shortly.


41 posted on 03/19/2012 6:31:32 AM PDT by JimRed (Excising a cancer before it kills us waters the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten

If this is decree meaningless, why did 0 bother to issue it?

No, this is the legalistic rationale for expanding federal power. There is nothing stopping this from being another NRA (National Recovery Administration).

The NRA of the 1930s was eventually thrown out by the Supreme Court, which (IIRC) ruled that the Commerce Clause did not extend to such extremes. This degree appears to rely on the function of the President as Commander in Chief, and on some obscure laws conveniently vague as to be stretched for any purpose.

In the 1930s, theCourt was attacked by FDR, who tried to enlarge it so as to fill it with new, obedient, zombie appointees. This failed for political reasons.

But now 0 is but one member away from gaining a truly obedient majority on the Court, through appointing various dopey nonentities and affirmative-action celebrities. The two women on the Supreme Court are the most brainless of the zombies, both totally unqualified except as tokens intended to please their respective minorities.

The last was the “wise Latina.” Just how is the supposed wisdom of this person related to her being a Latina? Are Latinas known for their especial wisdom? Then please tell us which groups they surpass in wisdom! Is a Latina wiser than a non-Hispanic woman, or wiser than an Hispanic man; or wiser than a Black, or an Asian? Inquiring minds want to know.

It is all completely phony, but also dangerous. Truly, our freedoms are slipping through our hands.


42 posted on 03/19/2012 6:32:48 AM PDT by docbnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: PeteB570
have the transaction recorded at the new NSA facility in Utah

The sucker's not even built yet. I was out there a couple of weeks ago and there ain't much there.

That's not saying that the transaction isn't recorded.

43 posted on 03/19/2012 6:33:26 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (Liberty is in danger. We are the generation. This is our role. Now is the time. Defend Freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mikey_1962

By Executive Order (in another age what would more aptly be called a “Royal Decree”) no less. The writing on the wall may as well be composed in neon. He wants a civil war and thinks he can win.


44 posted on 03/19/2012 6:33:37 AM PDT by katana (Just my opinions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldasrocks

“RElAX, Its just the new way to fight the fat. They will give us all 600 calories of food a day like they do in North Korea. Then we will be able to march in parades honoring our Dear Leader.”

Yeah, i hope Obama doesn’t die before me because i am sure i would be beaten for not grieving satisfactorily.


45 posted on 03/19/2012 6:33:46 AM PDT by fatrat (extremely extreme right-wing radicalized veteran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

When? Right after 9/11? EO#, please. If it is still in effect, then why did Barry need to do this other than poke another PINO finger in the Patriots’ eyes.


46 posted on 03/19/2012 6:34:04 AM PDT by Sioux-san
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Slayton
Again, Obama has crossed the line, but I'm confident that the GOP led House will revoke this Executive Order.

Did you forget the < /sarc > tag?

47 posted on 03/19/2012 6:35:59 AM PDT by JimRed (Excising a cancer before it kills us waters the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kenmcg
"Just as Hitler had his storm troopers, the OWS’s are Bam’s storm troopers in training."

Not trying to belittle your concern, but I would suspect that a vast majority of those people have never touched a firearm in their lives. If they were one day handed weapons and instructed to go out and arrest us, they would suffer far more casualties than we would.

Our side has the firearms and wherewithal (and determination) to use them effectively. Most of us have military service and understand combat tactics. Those OWS fools are nothing more than cannon fodder. It would be like fish in a barrel.
48 posted on 03/19/2012 6:40:21 AM PDT by FortWorthPatriot (Obama is no Hitler; Hitler got the Olympics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Sioux-san

Most of your questions are answered here;

http://hotair.com/archives/2012/03/18/national-defense-resources-preparedness-executive-order-power-grab-or-update/

“Indeed — but all of that was equally true before Obama issued an update to a 73-year-old effort that changed nothing about his executive authority and power. To the extent that we’re all more aware of it, that’s good, but we shouldn’t act as though this was an Obama novelty, and we really shouldn’t jump to conspiracy-think conclusions without understanding the history of these EOs.”


49 posted on 03/19/2012 6:43:36 AM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Mikey_1962

Don’t jump on me too hard...but my husband read the entire executive order and said that much of this has been in effect for many years. (I’m not saying that it’s good.)

For a different view, see this: http://volokh.com/2012/03/18/new-eo-on-natural-resources-defense-preparedness

An excerpt: “The EO is simply an update of prior orders on the same subject going back decades to, among other things, account for changes in the cabinet and the like. if this is a presidential power grab — and I don’t believe it is — the power was grabbed decades ago.”


50 posted on 03/19/2012 6:44:14 AM PDT by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mikey_1962

has the added side benefit of getting the Ron Paul people all fired-up at a critical point in the GOP nomination process


51 posted on 03/19/2012 6:45:13 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SumProVita

You are correct, the power was grabbed decades ago. The concern now is that we have someone in the White House who seems likely to make use of the power.

The idea is that the USA has existing policies in place that would facilitate a president (any president) in being a dictator. The fear is that we might (some day) have someone in the White House who would make use of these Executive Orders.

The similarity is to the constitution of the Weimar Republic in Germany. It wasn’t a bad document at all. But it did contain Article 48 — and that basically said that the German Constitution would be suspended if a state of emergency were declared. Well, Hitler was elected chancellor, the Reichstag building caught on fire, and Hitler said, “Okay. No more Constitution. I am the fuhrer and my word is law.”

Completely legal and in accordance with government mandates put in place by others.


52 posted on 03/19/2012 6:47:03 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy ("And the public gets what the public wants" -- The Jam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: SumProVita

Much of it, yes. But I have heard that the inclusion of “in peacetime” makes much more mischief possible.


53 posted on 03/19/2012 6:47:53 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Shut up and drill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

American Presidents have had exactly this same power since 1939

It was wrong then, it is wrong today, and it will be wrong any time in the future. The lemmings defence never worked with me.

54 posted on 03/19/2012 6:48:48 AM PDT by USCG SimTech (Honored to serve since '71)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Sioux-san
This article answers most of your questions:

http://hotair.com/archives/2012/03/18/national-defense-resources-preparedness-executive-order-power-grab-or-update/

55 posted on 03/19/2012 6:49:07 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun

Well said. Glenn Beck has been warning about “an event” that will take place before the election. I don’t doubt for a second that this bunch will do ANYTHING to hold onto power.


56 posted on 03/19/2012 6:50:53 AM PDT by demkicker (My passion for freedom is stronger than that of Democrats whose obsession is to enslave me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun

Well said. Glenn Beck has been warning about “an event” that will take place before the election. I don’t doubt for a second that this bunch will do ANYTHING to hold onto power.


57 posted on 03/19/2012 6:51:09 AM PDT by demkicker (My passion for freedom is stronger than that of Democrats whose obsession is to enslave me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Where in the EO is “in peacetime” found?


58 posted on 03/19/2012 6:51:55 AM PDT by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: kenmcg

I’m not so sure...I can envisage the cynic in chief using them as the excuse to implement the order...unrest etc.

Throws them under the bus to look like a hero and savior of the middle class. a grateful nation votes zero.

There is NOTHING the sumbich won’t do or try to do to save is sorry azz.

FUBO!


59 posted on 03/19/2012 6:52:27 AM PDT by Adder (Da bro has GOT to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SumProVita
Sec. 102. Policy. The United States must have an industrial and technological base capable of meeting national defense requirements and capable of contributing to the technological superiority of its national defense equipment in peacetime and in times of national emergency. The domestic industrial and technological base is the foundation for national defense preparedness. The authorities provided in the Act shall be used to strengthen this base and to ensure it is capable of responding to the national defense needs of the United States.

The key is, I need to solidly determine that this phrase was added. Right now I am going on the words of others. I will confirm or refute. If I confirm, it is a very troubling inclusion and must be overturned immediately.

60 posted on 03/19/2012 6:56:36 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Shut up and drill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson