Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gingrich: Limbaugh right to apologize for remarks (AP headline)
KGW - Portland ^ | March 4, 2012 | AP

Posted on 03/04/2012 6:25:04 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife

WASHINGTON (AP) — Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich says Rush Limbaugh was wrong to call a college student a "slut" and "prostitute" in the debate over contraception coverage, and was right to apologize for the comments.

Gingrich tells CNN's "State of the Union" that he's glad the conservative commentator issued the apology on Saturday and that it's time to move beyond the controversy.

Gingrich says it's "silly" to suggest that Limbaugh speaks for the GOP. Gingrich contends the media are "trying desperately to protect" President Barack Obama.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: contraception; cultoflimbaugh; cultofrush; diversion; gingrich; gingrich2012; kenyanbornmuzzie; limbaugh4obama; mittromney; msm; namecalling; namecallingisstupid; newtgingrich; ricksantorum; rush; rushlimbaugh; rushscrewdup; rushtoobigtofail; sandrafluke; sandytheslut; slut
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-202 next last
To: mardi59

Torpedoed his impeachment? He was impeached. What witnesses do you need. He was screwing Monica. He lied about it. Witnesses were not needed. He was on tape. If this was a true situation than Newt himself would be bringing it up and using it against Santorum since he is using everything else to try and knock him out.


161 posted on 03/04/2012 11:52:56 AM PST by napscoordinator (A moral principled Christian with character is the frontrunner! Congrats Santorum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

I noticed that he only apologised for his choice of words. I hope is only apologising for “prostitute” and not “slut.”

Monday 12-3PM est should be fun.


162 posted on 03/04/2012 11:55:02 AM PST by Daveinyork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: MuttTheHoople
What Tea Partiers and other Conservatives need to do is get a Filibuster-proof Senate and a Veto-resistant House. This can be done by electing Tea Party Conservatives in the GOP primaries, and ride the anti-Obama wave to victory in November.

I can't argue with that logic. I just feel Newt and that combination would be historic.

163 posted on 03/04/2012 12:05:46 PM PST by McGruff (The south shall rise again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Toespi

Well being principled doesn’t make us the most popular on the playground. You guys are just in it as a fan club.


164 posted on 03/04/2012 12:06:31 PM PST by napscoordinator (A moral principled Christian with character is the frontrunner! Congrats Santorum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

I haven’t listened to Rush in awhile and have not heard the exact quote. I will say it is a bit surprising to read of an apology which was announced on a Saturday night.

My gut is telling me to hold off before saying he folded too fast. I am 1/2 thinking there may be an apology ‘Part 2.’. If so it will be rather entertaining. The other option is this was a lawyer driven apology. His lawyers made him an offer he could not refuse.


165 posted on 03/04/2012 12:17:33 PM PST by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reddon
I have the feeling that because of Rush’s “apology” posted Saturday and the firestorm of controversy it has created, Rush is going to have 40 million people listening to him when he opens his show on Monday morning instead of his usual 20 million.....

No doubt. He owes the candidates air time to make their case for their candidacy, time they lost answering questions about him the last few days.

166 posted on 03/04/2012 12:25:33 PM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright
The charge of hypocrisy is only applicable if someone is hypocritical.

Hard to be hypocritical when you are always right.</sarcasm>

167 posted on 03/04/2012 12:56:21 PM PST by itsahoot (I will write in Palin, if Romney is on the ticket. Fair warning to the E-Pubs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: bossmechanic
Much as I like Newt, I would strongly suggest he avoid offering any commentary or opinions on promiscuous individuals (of any gender)regardless of circumstances. Rush can take care of himself.

Newt answered the question posed by Gregory correctly. AP, as the lib media will do, took that as the primary comment to highlight. If you read the Newsbusters' transcript you will see that:

Gingrich Scolds Gregory and Media for Making Limbaugh 'The Great National Crisis of This Week'

Gotta agree with your ending comment:

The GOP has difficulty finding it’s posterior with both hands.

168 posted on 03/04/2012 12:59:42 PM PST by CedarDave (Donna Brazile: "... we we believe that the weakest candidate ... [is] Mitt Romney.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
...But Newt said too much as well. ..

Newt always says too much, he makes great points then wonks them silly. Newt is the most intelligent guy in the public service arena, only a fool doubts that, but I often find myself screaming at the TV, stop Newt, you have said enough.

Remember how he ranted on the grandmothers and deportation, he didn't need to say anything on that issue but kept on going until his foot was firmly in his mouth.

169 posted on 03/04/2012 1:01:54 PM PST by itsahoot (I will write in Palin, if Romney is on the ticket. Fair warning to the E-Pubs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: mardi59

As far as the impeachment goes, maybe you should hold the Chief Justice accountable, since he had no clue as to his responsibility.


170 posted on 03/04/2012 1:07:11 PM PST by itsahoot (I will write in Palin, if Romney is on the ticket. Fair warning to the E-Pubs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: AC86UT89
Another week gone, another round of Sunday morning talk shows spent answering questions like “Are Republicans declaring war on women?” and “Does Rush Limbaugh speak for the Republican Party?” instead of Obama’s crappy record, the terrible economy, the huge federal deficit and debt problems, Iran getting nukes, etc......

Yes! The hosts were drooling with delight.

171 posted on 03/04/2012 1:10:20 PM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot; C. Edmund Wright

You misdirected your reply re that quote.

That was C. Edmund Wright who wrote it.


172 posted on 03/04/2012 1:12:57 PM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
What does it say about the college co-ed Sandra Fluke, who goes before a congressional committee and essentially says that she must be paid to have sex

It wasn’t even a congressional committee, just a press conference rigged to sound like a congressional hearing, people lapped it up.

The Dems may be stupid, but they are much better politicians than the conservatives. You know the ones that will never be loved, but they keep on kissing up in the hopes that they will be.

173 posted on 03/04/2012 1:19:06 PM PST by itsahoot (I will write in Palin, if Romney is on the ticket. Fair warning to the E-Pubs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik
Rush had already apologized, and Newt said that was the right thing for him to do.

If that was all he said it would be great, but then he went on and on and on, which is a fault Newt has, he has so many words bottled up he has to use them.

174 posted on 03/04/2012 1:27:14 PM PST by itsahoot (I will write in Palin, if Romney is on the ticket. Fair warning to the E-Pubs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Toespi
You Santorum supporters are the nastiest most vitriolic people on this website.

That is just not true.

There has been a circular firing squad blasting away for some time, and to what end? It only helps Romney and by Proxy Obama, because Romney will not win, if it takes my vote.

I can support either Newt or Santorum, but if they are both all beat up who does that help. Like it or not some of the critics trash here showed up in the last debate. The stuff may have come up from another source, but this forum makes it easier.

That aside there are many Freepers that would make a better case in a debate based on facts, that seem to be unknown to any of the candidates.

175 posted on 03/04/2012 1:36:50 PM PST by itsahoot (I will write in Palin, if Romney is on the ticket. Fair warning to the E-Pubs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP
Seriously, you Santorum fanatics are beyond logic and reason.

Oh psyco you are too funny.

176 posted on 03/04/2012 1:41:22 PM PST by itsahoot (I will write in Palin, if Romney heads the ticket. Fair warning to the E-Pubs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot
If that was all he said it would be great, but then he went on and on and on, which is a fault Newt has, he has so many words bottled up he has to use them.

And he used them to attack the MSM and Obama. Newt skillfully redirected the interview back on THEM!

177 posted on 03/04/2012 1:46:09 PM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright
RS's comment was worse, but Newt's comment has closed the gap on this, and Newt needed a huge gap on this. He had it. He blew it.

Could you explain a little more what you mean by this? I "think" I understand, but that's a good sign I probably don't.

178 posted on 03/04/2012 2:36:15 PM PST by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
When you are quoting news or commentary sources, could you please mark off the quoted material a little better?

Something like using the <blockquote> formatting tag, and various highlights or alternate fonts like <tt>, <b>, and setting fonts using the <font face="centaur"> command (Centaur, Book Antiqua, Bookman Old Style, Arial, Arial Narrow, Lydian, are all good quoting fonts to use. The off switch for all the above is simply </font>.)

Thanks in advance.

179 posted on 03/04/2012 2:46:14 PM PST by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus

Post 129 and 141 sum it up....


180 posted on 03/04/2012 2:52:19 PM PST by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-202 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson