This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
Locked on 03/13/2017 5:04:54 PM PDT by Jim Robinson, reason:
counterproductive flamewar |
Posted on 03/01/2012 10:30:19 PM PST by ReformationFan
Noting that the cause of Andrew Breitbarts unexpected death yesterday was being examined by the Los Angeles County Coroners office, talk-radio host Michael Savage raised the question of whether the conservative media powerhouse who recently announced he had videos that could politically damage President Obama was murdered.
On his top-rated show today, Savage played an audio clip of Breitbart telling an audience at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington last month that he had obtained videos that shed light on Obamas ties to radicals in the early 1980s who helped propel him to the presidency.
Maybe my overly active imagination kicked into overdrive, Savage told his listeners of his decision to raise the question. But you heard what Breitbart said he has videos
were going to vet the president.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Rush has a huge impact and I could see that, but Breitbart had minimal impact.
****************************
I'm sceptical, too. I suppose that I might be more suspicious if the tapes Breitbart was planning to release are likely to be very damaging to the current resident of the white house.
Thanks for the ping, Beaversmom!
To suggest that Andrew was a 2nd or 3rd tier factor in the fight against tyranny is just silly.
Lets take a quick peek at the facts shall we:
He was on the top 20 list of enemies from the barry camp.
He was the target ad nauseum of david brock/eric boehlart from Media Matters who taunted him on a daily basis - and oh my, who is it again that funds Media Matters? Old coot Georgie Soros you say? You’re correct.
Who was it that stood beside Sarah at every Tea Party Rally she attended? Oh yes, that was Andrew - very very very well known by anyone remotely interested in the Tea Party.
I have no idea if the firebrand was taken out, I do know that the entire story put out does give one pause.
[ Was Breitbart Assassinated? ]
I was thinking the same thing.. quietly..
I already am prone to conspiracy theory’s..
Probably he died of heart attack or stroke or aneurism of some kind..
-OR- he just DIED...
**Note: but he did promise some expose’ on Zerodamus this year..
Maybe he died of being heart sick America is choosing Ted Kennedys good friend as republican candidate.. Its quite “obscene” republican America even wants Willard as President..
OK.. OK.. I’m going with Brietbart died of a “Broken heart”...
Breaitbart had a heart condition, and that was almost certainly the cause of his death. But the folks on the left are perfectly morally capable of taking him out without compunction.
Yes, Noory gets into it; sometimes 'rightly'. ..other times; ridiculous stuff. . .but, of course even some of the seemingly ridiculous - is not.
I don’t want my opinion that he wasn’t all that well known to be taken as speaking ill of the dead. It’s just that this isn’t an in memoriam thread but is instead a “was he assassinated” thread.
I don’t think he was, if the word “assassinated” mean “high level hit”. Could he have been murdered? I suppose some independent acting nut could have killed him.
Did I read someplace, though, that he did have heart issues in the past?
Only God knows... but stuff like THIS ...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2853545/posts
Shows how capable and willing the left is to hurt their “enemies”.
I already am prone to conspiracy theorys..
Probably he died of heart attack or stroke or aneurism of some kind..
-OR- he just DIED...
**Note: but he did promise some expose on Zerodamus this year.. Maybe he died of being heart sick America is choosing Ted Kennedys good friend as republican candidate.. Its quite obscene republican America even wants Willard as President..
OK.. OK.. Im going with Brietbart died of a Broken heart...
**************************
Well said. I have read on various threads here that he had heart problems. I can understand that people are shocked and upset, because I certainly am. Still, imho we must avoid overreaction. Sometimes people die. It seems that at least one of Brietbart's friends was concerned about his health. That to me indicates that his was not death by assassination, but by natural causes.
Yesterday one thread quoted a “friend” (no name) as saying he had a history of heart problems last year. Andrew’s FIL Orson Bean was quoted as saying he did not know of any heart problems.
If you are looking at that route remember he spent his last two hours at a trendy Brentwood bar sipping wine and talking politics with strangers. If he went to the lavatory at anytime and left his glass unattended it would have been easy to slip something in it. A potentiator like Vistaril can cause an effective overdose of what ever meds he was taking. Succinylcholine also would cause collapse due to changes in cardiac rhythm and death altho it would probably be more rapid in onset and it breaks down very quickly making it hard to detect. (takes tin foil hat off)
I dont think he was, if the word assassinated mean high level hit. Could he have been murdered? I suppose some independent acting nut could have killed him.
Did I read someplace, though, that he did have heart issues in the past?
*********************************
I did not at all conclude from your post that you were "speaking ill of the dead", and I don't really understand why anyone would unfairly conclude that, but people are upset.
I have read various posts here that have indicated that Breitbart had heart problems, and that at least one of his friends had expressed concerns. I think you're absolutely correct that if it was murder, it could have simply been some nut.
One thing that I do know is that if he was the kind of man that he appeared to be, the last thing that he would want would be for FReepers to turn on each other because of his untimely death.
I'm with you 100%. Sometimes when people fling about the words "conspiracy theories" (as though anything not in the MSM is nutcase lies?) I find the definitions and post them. Some people use the word "conspiracy" to mean "wing nut paranoid fantasy". But it is a real word with real meanings and there are many who have and are right now conspiring to comment treason and many other crimes in connection with propping up the usurper illegally in the WH.
I doubt that he was taken out. He wasn’t that important to them, but Obama and the rats would take somebody out without blinking an eye.
*
I sure don’t have a link, and I might have heard wrong. I was listening to Hannity, and doing some other things at the time, if I’m mistaken sorry.
But, if AB had no history of heart problems as alot here have said, then we are, in my opinion, looking at an assassination, and that’s plain a## scary.
Did you ask for a private autopsy? Under the law you can request it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.