Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Santorum Delivers a GOP Stunner [Shoe-String Budget: Clean Sweep: Hat-Trick: Wins MN; MO, and CO!]
Wall St. J ^ | February 07, 2012 | NEIL KING JR. And DANNY YADRON

Posted on 02/07/2012 10:36:59 PM PST by Steelfish

Santorum Delivers a GOP Stunner Former Senator Wins in Minnesota, Missouri; Romney Campaign Plays Down Nonbinding Contests

By NEIL KING JR. And DANNY YADRON

DENVER—Rick Santorum jolted the Republican presidential race Tuesday by winning nominating contests in Missouri and Minnesota, puncturing Mitt Romney's claim to be the unstoppable front-runner.

Mr. Santorum, a former Pennsylvania senator, was running neck and neck with Mr. Romney in preliminary returns from Colorado, a state Mr. Romney won by a wide margin in 2008.

With about 70% of the Colorado vote counted, Mr. Santorum had 38%, to 36% for Mr. Romney. Four years ago, Mr. Romney carried Colorado with 60% of the vote.

Mr. Santorum's twin victories in the Midwest will give his campaign a much-needed burst of momentum and may stir doubt about Mr. Romney's abilities to woo conservatives to his side in important electoral states such as Missouri. So far, Mr. Romney has won in states where he has devoted significant campaign time and advertising dollars.

Mr. Santorum won 55% of the Missouri vote, while Mr. Romney followed with 25%. Texas Rep. Ron Paul was trailing with 12%. Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich wasn't on the Missouri ballot.

Mr. Santorum's Missouri victory margin of almost 75,000 votes over Mr. Romney was nearly 29,000 more than Mr. Romney's combined Iowa and Nevada total.

While the Tuesday results didn't directly award any of the delegates needed to claim the GOP nomination, they showed voters rejecting Mr. Romney even in states where he had performed well four years ago.

Mr. Romney had carried Minnesota in 2008 but placed third there on Tuesday. With 85% of precincts in, Mr. Santorum had 45% of the vote, while Mr. Paul had 27%. Mr. Romney had 17% of the vote and Mr. Gingrich claimed 11%.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Colorado; US: Minnesota; US: Missouri
KEYWORDS: aldo; caucusprimaries; colorado; geeksweatervest; minnesota; missouri; newt; ricksantorum; romney; santorum; santorum4romney; santorumwins
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 341-349 next last
To: tennmountainman

This is wonderful. Back in 2008, we would have been thrilled if Romney could be our anti-McStain. Now we have a chance for someone more conservative than Romney. Haha!

I am glad that Newt had his time in the sun. He comes up with great ideas sometimes and deserves respect.

As for Santorum, people [who matter] have nothing but good things to say about him so far as I know.


101 posted on 02/08/2012 4:41:00 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (George Washington: [Government] is a dangerous servant and a terrible master.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: toddausauras

Exactly, yet another shot across the RNC Establishment’s bow.


102 posted on 02/08/2012 4:43:22 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (George Washington: [Government] is a dangerous servant and a terrible master.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
Mr. Romney had carried Minnesota in 2008 but placed third there on Tuesday. With 85% of precincts in, Mr. Santorum had 45% of the vote, while Mr. Paul had 27%. Mr. Romney had 17% of the vote and Mr. Gingrich claimed 11%.

Time for Romney to drop out of the race and endorse Ron Paul so there can be a united effort to defeat Santorum...

Just trying to be consistent, here...

103 posted on 02/08/2012 4:44:25 AM PST by Haiku Guy (The problem with Internet quotes is you never know if they are real -- Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Downinthedixie

“The birth control issue was beyond stupid by 0.”

That also makes clear how much better it would be to have a CONSERVATIVE candidate other than Romney.


104 posted on 02/08/2012 4:45:35 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (George Washington: [Government] is a dangerous servant and a terrible master.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: WilliamofCarmichael; DarthVader; kingattax

Oh My.....

Looks like a Tebow Moment! :-)

LOL


105 posted on 02/08/2012 4:48:15 AM PST by left that other site
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

The conservatives are running against Romney instead of Obama. We will get our just desserts in November.


106 posted on 02/08/2012 4:55:57 AM PST by Hattie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan69
would like to do away with contraceptives

You're a fake.

107 posted on 02/08/2012 4:57:34 AM PST by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (Some men just want to watch the world burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Reagan69

I don’t like Santorum at all; he is all big government, establishment GOP and has a rather disagreeable Jimmy Carter type personality, without the smile.

However, I’m really glad that Romney got knocked back, even though two of caucuses were not binding and Gingrich wasn’t even in one of them.

Maybe the GOP will have to rethink the inevitability of Romney, who is a truly odious person and should be nowhere near the Presidency. We’ve already had a few years of one odious person and we don’t need another.

If the GOP hadn’t been pushing Romney from the start, he would never have gotten as far as he has, because he really has nothing to offer.


108 posted on 02/08/2012 5:01:34 AM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Downinthedixie

Try reading it at 3:16 and it will make sense.


109 posted on 02/08/2012 5:03:07 AM PST by CH3CN (A stitch in time is worth two in the bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Downinthedixie
Nominating a conservative and losing would make this whole process a waste of time.

Incorrect. Nominating a liberal Republican (Romney) and winning is actually the worst possible outcome. Nominating a liberal Republican and losing is second worse.

Nominating a conservative and losing is the second best outcome. At least our message will get put out there by someone who actually believes it and we have a chance to educate the voters nationwide, thus building the framework for future victories.
110 posted on 02/08/2012 5:03:38 AM PST by Antoninus (Mitt Romney -- attempting to execute a hostile take-over of the Republican Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
Clear "electable" alternative to Romney.

Please explain to me how Santorum can defeat Obama. It's not 1950 anymore (unfortunately). The halftime show at the Super Bowl tells you all you need to know about where the average voting boob is at.

Really - I can't accept Mitt, it is unlikely that Newt can make it in the long haul, and I just cannot see a Rick Santorum path to victory.

I'm prepared to believe, if you can convince me.


111 posted on 02/08/2012 5:04:06 AM PST by Jim Noble ("The Germans: At your feet, or at your throat" - Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

How about this ticket, Bigbob:

Santorum - pres - appoints judiciary
Gingrich - vp - Senator would love Gingrich presiding there
Romney - car czar - only czar position not eliminated and Romney applies all the knowledge he gained at Bain Capital of how to save failing companies to the auto industry.


112 posted on 02/08/2012 5:07:42 AM PST by ngat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: bigbob
I sure like what I’ve heard from Santorum lately. For sure he would be a contrast against Obama, not just “Obama-lite”.

I would be happy if Rick and Newt came to an agreement that they would ally against Mitt, with whichever had the lower delegate count at the convention tossing his delegates to the higher candidate in exchange for becoming the VP on the ticket.

113 posted on 02/08/2012 5:15:27 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (I'd agree with you, but then we would both be wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
Mitt Romney and the GOP Establishment were not amused by this turn of events...


114 posted on 02/08/2012 5:19:20 AM PST by COBOL2Java (Controlling RINOs in Congress is like herding cats; should we be surprised Newt got scratched?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

How many times, and how many ways, do we need to tell Karl Rove to screw off?


115 posted on 02/08/2012 5:23:43 AM PST by Lazamataz (Yes, I am THAT Conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamofCarmichael

My theory is that the American public is SICK TO DEATH of the media and party elites deciding who our candidate will be and forcing him upon us and aren’t going to take it anymore!

I’m STILL scratching my head over how we ended up with John McCain in 2008!!!


116 posted on 02/08/2012 5:38:53 AM PST by a real Sheila ("Vado a bordo, cazzo!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

When and under what circumstances did Aldo Santorum naturalize?


117 posted on 02/08/2012 5:51:48 AM PST by ASA Vet (Natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. De Vattel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
ABR

Gingrich-Santorum or Santorum-Gingrich.

118 posted on 02/08/2012 6:00:25 AM PST by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
If Romney can't win Colorado with it's significant Mormon population, then he ain't gonna win in the Bible Belt or the corn belt.

You are right. I had overlooked that.

It actually has a huge border with Utah, doesn't it?

Wow! Romney is absolutely weak in his own back yard. Amazing

119 posted on 02/08/2012 6:03:10 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Pray Continued Victory for our Troops Still in Afghan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Santorum articulates a Conservative ideology and does have credibility.

The path to victory in a general election isn't really that complicated. The seldom publicized truth (and this according to polls) is that most of the Country consider themselves Conservative. Rather than worrying about the Independents, a Republican nominee should focus on turning out their own base. This strategy is the key to success.

Romney doesn't excite the base. Sorry to say, Gingrich doesn't appear to excite enough of the base either. While all three candidates can draw the anti-Obama vote to different degrees (the lesser of two evils argument), it appears that Santorum, through his message, also is conveying that he is a true Conservative representative, giving Conservatives something to vote for, not just an alternative vote to Obama.

To those of us who believe in the ideology, last night was a great night and might be the real beginning of something very good.

Santorum’s biggest draw back has been the perception that he isn't electable. Last night likely changed that.

120 posted on 02/08/2012 6:03:36 AM PST by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 341-349 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson