Posted on 01/26/2012 5:55:04 AM PST by RaceBannon
Article II SUPERPAC streaming live video and audio at this link
LOL! Dr. C is either a liar or has been living under a rock or both. Sampson has been on the internet news for his work on this since at least 2010.
Weather Underground, Black Panthers, Charles Manson all the kooks from that era had the same idea.
Some never gave up on the idea. Black Panthers still preach race war and “Kill cracker babies”.
The radical left doesn’t change.
The turn your head and cough president...
Now that’s funny.
I never said he did submit anything in court. I was responding to another poster that was speculating that he would submit it later.
If you had bothered to read before commenting you would know that.
Read Brown Deer’s comment.
:-D
Thanks so much, Brown Deer. Haven’t been able to keep up with all the developments today and appreciate the informative pings.
I haven’t been this optimistic in a LONG time.
“”The Judge pulled the lawyers for the three cases into chambers before it all began and advised them that he would be issuing a default judgment in our favor, since the Defense council failed to show, and wanted to end it there.
Now were merely awaiting the publishing of this Judges ruling which, as previously stated, will be a Default Judgment.
In other words
we won. Now its time for the rest of the States to take my lead and duplicate this effort.” ~~ CARL SWENSSON”
Thanks for the update. Holy moly, this is the longest thread on this subject that I’ve ever seen at FR! Will it go over 1,000 comments??
Sven is just trying to dishearten us, IMHO.
I think so too.
Here’s an oldie but a goodie.....well worth spending some time on.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2450158/posts
your understanding of Wong is wong
Let's take a step back and look at the bigger picture.
Barack Obama's eligibility as President is not being questioned by the first two sets of attorneys -- Taitz is a separate case and another matter.
Obama is being sued, as a private citizen, to be required to show that he meets the eligibility standards to appear on a primary ballot in the state of Georgia.
The reason they can do this is that nobody has a "right" to be elected; still less, then, do they have a "right" to appear on the ballot: the political parties and/or the states have various hoops you have to jump through, and various laws.
The first two lawyers said, "He can't be eligible, can he? After all, he himself has admitted that his father was never a citizen. Regardless of where he was born."
And IIRC they submitted a subpoena duces tecum (requiring the production of certain documents, including the birth certificate) to the court. NOT as the left wing trolls would have it, to prove he was born offshore; but to show his father.
Obama didn't show up, preferring to vacation in Phoenix; and his lawyers didn't show up.
When the case didn't go away, Obama and his lawyers did the following:
1) write a letter saying "You can't make me, neener neener." This letter included reference to a case which claimed that the State of Georgia didn't have statutory authority to keep him off the ballot, and concluded by saying "...so showing up is a moot point. We win, 'cuz we said so. So there!"
2) when this didn't work they wrote a similar letter to the Georgia secretary of state.
3) Simultaneously, the treasonous vermin sycophants started the spin machine that Obama was born to single mother yada yada. ("See, I'm an orphan so it doesn't matter who my father was. He died years before I was born anyway wank wank.")
Comes the morning of the hearing, and ...no Obama, no Obama lawyers.
The judge scratches his head and says, "Well, only one party showed up. That means default judgment as to the consequences (he doesn't get on the ballot) but we don't have to rule or take into evidence the substance of any of your claims."
The various lawyers go, "No, your honor, please. We've worked so hard, let us enter some of this into the record."
His honor says "O.K." and off they go.
However, since all three cases were heard by the same judge, but along different (non-coordinated!) lines of attack, each of them argues for a different thing in a way which *might* be used to step on the toes of the others.
And so resident trolls like [censored] and [censored] go around trying to claim that if the documents have been accepted by the judge, then Obama's birth is proven.
Well, no it hasn't simply because they are not original or sworn documents. And findings of fact in one case do not automatically carry over to all other cases.
Similarly, full faith and credit won't apply here simply because there has not been a trial on the merits: one side simply failed to present any evidence, so they will not be given a spot on the ballot, since there is no intrinsic "right" to such and they failed to clear what amount to administrative hurdles.
What *is* important -- if we can get past the propaganda barrage and the RINO fears of a race war -- is, a birth certificate costs, what? Twenty-five bucks, plus another twenty-five for rush deliver? That's less than a pound of Wagyu beef.
Why is he being so secretive? What does he have to hide?
(Not only the birth certificate, but almost *everything* about his past, from ALL sources. As someone pointed out comparing him to Cain and Gingrich, where are Obama's old girlfriends?)
Cheers! Cheers!
“Heres an oldie but a goodie.....well worth spending some time on.”
LVR,
Thanks very much for the link. WOW. That thread was before my time as a FReeper, but the subject is titilating, at a minimum; I’ll check it out.
stop with your private FReepmail!
From Kleon | 01/26/2012 2:59:02 PM PST new
Come on, are you with Hawthorn or FJD? Youre not a real birther, are you? Even if you were a Fogbow person you can tell me, I wont say anything.
Agreed. In my trials I have evidence, de bene esse depostion tapes, which are taken in as a part of the court record but NOT allowed into evidence. Sven needs to come in off the ledge.
""The Judge pulled the lawyers for the three cases into chambers before it all began and advised them that he would be issuing a default judgment in our favor, since the Defense council failed to show, and wanted to end it there.I haven't had a chance to keep up with the happenings, but I did expect Obama and his lawyer to be "no shows". If I remember correctly, then this issue would transfer completely into the S.O.S.'s hands and he makes a ruling of whether he will place Obama on the ballot or not.
Now were merely awaiting the publishing of this Judges ruling which, as previously stated, will be a Default Judgment.
In other words we won. Now its time for the rest of the States to take my lead and duplicate this effort." ~~ CARL SWENSSON"
Actually, this hearing today was a trial. They may call it something else, but it was a trial.
Please post the material you have that we have not seen. Who knows, it may be the missing piece in someone else’s puzzle.
The original Long Thread cleared 10,000 posts IIRC.
I feel like I’m in the Twilight Zone here. I don’t know who I’m talking to half the time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.