OBAMA ELIGIBILITY HEARING TO BE STREAMED LIVE STARTING AT 0900 EST

Article II SUPERPAC ^ | 01/26/2012 | Article II SUPERPAC

[RaceBannon]

Article II SUPERPAC streaming live video and audio at this link

[Brown Deer]

I won't be surprised if the Judge rules he is eligible.

"The Judge pulled the lawyers for the three cases into chambers before it all began and advised them that he would be issuing a default judgment in our favor, since the Defense council failed to show, and wanted to end it there.

Now we’re merely awaiting the publishing of this Judge’s ruling which, as previously stated, will be a Default Judgment.
In other words…we won. Now it’s time for the rest of the States to take my lead and duplicate this effort." ~~ CARL SWENSSON

[GregNH]

Obama: "There are still people [turn head to other side of room] like a few in Georgia [turn head back to the other side of room] who still think I was not born in Hawaii! [turn head to other side of room] Can you believe that!" [cue the laughter]

[Obama Exposer]

RummyChick. Why doesn’t it say in the affirmed that Wong Kim Ark is a ‘natural born Citizen’?

[DiogenesLamp]

Thanks for the ping.

I am glad to see we won this one, but I'm not going to apologize for my pessimism. Nowadays it seems that it is a miracle when a court actually gets something RIGHT.

Now we need to duplicate this effort in more states.

[holden]

Is there anyone running a dem write-in campaign? They would be sure to win now.

There's valuable currency in being a king-maker and powerbroker, for sure, controlling the sum total of GA's electors!

HF

[null and void]

The ‘turn your head and cough’ president...

[Danae]

Given the whole Man’s Country thing... that comment is downright hysterical! LMAO

[DiogenesLamp]

Now we need to respond to the Obot's constant assertion that Orly has lost every court case she's been involved in. Instead, we need to point out that she WON the only one that has ever actually been tried.

All others cases were never permitted to begin. This is not losing on merits, this is losing on technicalities, which in my opinion is nothing but a denial of due process.

[Brown Deer]

I've only posted in three or four birther threads in the past month or so...

I've counted already 14 posts of yours in this thread alone today.

I don't see any new argument worth commenting on, and the birthers have been getting nastier and nastier as the failures pile up.

Failures? It looks like your president lost today!

[little jeremiah]

I’m just reading ... try this thread:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2838347/posts

Update: Obama’s GA Ballot...: Judge Wanted To Immediately Enter Default Judgment Against Obama
Obama Release Your Records ^ | January 26, 2012 | Dean Haskins

[RummyChick]

If I was arguing against Obama that is exactly what I would say. And I think it can be easily swatted away. Just as the Court of Appeals did in the Ankey case. It is quite possible that the Judges in that case never read the brief by the appellent.

However, that is not to say your argument wouldn’t get through to someone.

But the fact is that Gray’s ruling is that the 14th Amendment is declaratory . It outlines natural born citizenship since that is what was before them in THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BRIEF. They were presented an argument that the lower court was in error when THEY RULED: Ark was a natural born citizen.

I think many who post on this subject have NEVER even bothered to read the briefs or the lower court case.

You can’t run away from the fact that the question before them as presented by the appellent was that Ark was a natural born citizen as ruled by the lower court.

It is not the first time the phrase natural born citizen has come up. It did with the Look Tin Sing case that was used as controlling authority in the lower court case of Ark.

Common Law Doctrine as outlined in the lower court case and the SCOTUS decision show that Ark was a natural born citizen.

I don’t understand why you people don’t recognize this. Justice Fuller did and disagreed with the Majority.

I think the attorney today must have recognized something because it appeared to me he was trying to differentiate from Wong instead of embracing Wong as the lead case to determine if Obama is a citizen.

[Kleon]

I've counted already 14 posts of yours in this thread alone today.

Which is the most I've posted on the subject in months. It doesn't negate what I said.

[katnip]

Now we’re merely awaiting the publishing of this Judge’s ruling which, as previously stated, will be a Default Judgment. In other words…we won. Now it’s time for the rest of the States to take my lead and duplicate this effort."

I'm waiting till he publishes the default judgement as fact before celebrating.

[bushpilot1]

[Brown Deer]

It doesn't negate what I said.:
"I don't see any new argument worth commenting on..."

Really troll? your failures are piling up, deeper and deeper...

[philman_36]

That means Ark is a natural born citizen.

Perhaps you should heed your own words before you tell others what to do.
Read the Court of Appeals case of Ankey.

So here it tis...

Steve Ankeny and Bill Kruse v. Governor of the State of Indiana
The Court held that Mr. Wong Kim Ark was a citizen of the United States “at the time of his birth.”¹⁴

Footnote ¹⁴ We note the fact that the Court in Wong Kim Ark did not actually pronounce the plaintiff a “natural born Citizen” using the Constitution‟s Article II language is immaterial. For all but forty-four people in our nation‟s history (the forty-four Presidents), the dichotomy between who is a natural born citizen and who is a naturalized citizen under the Fourteenth Amendment is irrelevant. The issue addressed in Wong Kim Ark was whether Mr. Wong Kim Ark was a citizen of the United States on the basis that he was born in the United States.

Even while Ark distinctly stated that the question was if he was a citizen "by virtue of the first clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution".

[holden]

Did we not read report of the lawyers for the non-Orly cases leaving the courtroom? I understand these were separate cases that were heard juxtaposed for the ALJ's benefit. Though there would be one recommendation from Malihi to GA SoS, it doesn't follow to me that the cases became one. If there were intertwining and dependencies of evidence affecting the proceedings as if there was only one case, it would seem foolish for the lawyers to have left the courtroom before everything that might affect their case was presented (by Orly or her witnesses).

IANAL, but it seems to me the cases will be kept separate, and something that was not under dispute in one case does not imply it was not avalailable to be disputed in another case.

Sven is just trying to dishearten us, IMHO.

HF

[Kleon]

Sven is my favorite birther.

[Kleon]

Shout out!

Oh, you.

[RummyChick]

That wasn’t the issue before the court and thus why I said that the Judges probably didn’t read the brief by the APPELLENT who was THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

Look, SERIOUSLY, you are doing your cause disservice by refusing to understand Wong. Understand what it stands for and try to find reasons that could be argued as to why it should be overturned.

It was a BAD CASE. BAD LAW. BAD DECISIONS. BAD JUDGES.

Anyone who goes before a court and says that Wong follows Vattel will just look like an idiot. The lower court even mentions that they can’t follow Vattel.

Their decision AFFIRMED WITHOUT EXCEPTION.