That wasn’t the issue before the court and thus why I said that the Judges probably didn’t read the brief by the APPELLENT who was THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
Look, SERIOUSLY, you are doing your cause disservice by refusing to understand Wong. Understand what it stands for and try to find reasons that could be argued as to why it should be overturned.
It was a BAD CASE. BAD LAW. BAD DECISIONS. BAD JUDGES.
Anyone who goes before a court and says that Wong follows Vattel will just look like an idiot. The lower court even mentions that they can’t follow Vattel.
Their decision AFFIRMED WITHOUT EXCEPTION.
your understanding of Wong is wong