Posted on 01/20/2012 4:15:12 PM PST by usar91B
New Obama 2012 Campaign Flyer: "I was born in Hawaii to a Single Mother..."
This flyer is currently being shared / "re-shared" on Facebook. I am curious as to where it originated and thought it might interest my fellow freepers. I have only posted once or twice.. long ago, so 'bare' with me. ;) The text reads:
"I was born in Hawaii to a single mother.
I was raised in Kansas by my two loving grandparents.
I went to Harvard Law School and became a community organizer in Chicago.
My story is one told a million times over in this country; from sea to shining sea. It is a dream shared by all who come to this country seeking opportunity and prosperity.
I am NOT RADICAL.
I am NOT SOCIALIST.
I am NOT A MUSLIM TERRORIST.
I am NOT THE ANTI-CHRIST.
I am Barack Hussein Obama and I am the American Dream."
2012 BARACKOBAMA.COM
I remember when I first found the Daily KOS birth certificate posted. It was a big deal at the time. Some of my original images somehow disappeared from my site but I had made this page;
http://domania.us/Oaccess/OBAMA/BirthCertificate.html
http://domania.us/Oaccess/ObamaBirthCertificate.gif
I love how he states...
“come to this country”...
Did he just admit it?
LOL
I’m glad you’ve kept such a good archive.
If he ever releases a valid long form certificate of live birth, it might be the corrected one submitted to Hawaii. I want to see the one filed at birth ( if he was born where he claims.
If his father was BHO the First, he’s not a natural born citizen anyway. SCOTUS is dodging the key issue.
I think the GOP looked the other way in exchange for making sure McCain’s NBC status was “clarified” by Congress. Wait until a GOP nominee names a bright young minority VP nominee whose parents were immigrants. Todo el mundo will suddenly become concerned about NBC status.
Lol, I try to keep track unless things disappear.
Interesting graphic being shared on Facebook, I’ve never heard of Obama admitting his mother was a ‘single mother’ before. Many threads have posted information about the Obama’s divorce. Michelle once mentioned it.
Strange things always happen with Obama.
Obama has been ordered to appear in court in Atlanta Thursday, for a hearing on a complaint that says Obama isn’t a natural-born citizen and can’t be president.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2836240/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2836082/posts
Well - we know that isn’t going to happen. It seems that no laws can make him do anything. I hope we eventually learn the truth about all of this.
Edit; Michelle once mentioned his “single mother”.
“I was born a poor, black child....”
There seems to be any record of a marriage or of a divorce.
He wasn’t assembled from the products of two mothers.
Do you mean there is no record of a marriage???
I am one of those that believe there was no marriage.
However, someone here went through a process to obtain info from Hawaii. In that process that was some documentation about Ann that indicated she got a license or maybe it was an index that indicated there was some activity.
There a lot of things surrounding this whole story that I barely remember.
But this info could have only been the preliminary and not the actual marriage.
There was a divorce.
That does not mean there was a marriage.
One poster who works in family court said that anything can be said in a divorce decree.
My theory is different than many because I have no doubt whatsover that Obama’s family worked with the spooks.
There had to be a divorce because the story was that there was a marriage and Lolo would have gotten tripped up without a divorce decree.
I dunno if he's the first basturd sweetie. We never did get to see ole Bills' mothers' husband ........................................ FRegards
Thanks for the ping!
Takes two to tango, yuh know?
The terminology is used to evoke an image.
The idea to identification of the parentage and origin is the original birth records. At the time a child is born, the doctor takes a print from each foot and incorporates it onto the original hospital birth record. Exactly how this record is preserved may vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. In at least one state in the US, the doctor gets two sets of prints and one reposes in the state Health Department.
So on its face, identification of an adult to his birth records would be as simple as getting a print. And to the lawyer that print is an evidentary issue--witnesses of every stage with the print attested on the face of the print document under oath.
Now we have seen a vast array of fraudulent documents as we attempt to accumulate real evidence about the origin of zero. Significant criminal conduct is obviously involved. So the prospect of further fraud cannot be excluded.
On the other hand, if original documents exist, as I believe they do, modification of original prints incorporated in micro fiche records in at least one controlled location, in a birth file setting out a birth record consistent with the events as we now believe they occurred, may present a more difficult challenge for Opposing Forces than the Hawaii Health Department.
An argument based only on DNA is likely to rest on a factual inquiry into the evidence. It is possible that a conclusive chain of evidence might confirm the story--it is equally possible that it will not in which case the story would be rejected.
The legend that Zero's parentage might be the object of sufficient negative substance to merit an extensive effort to conceal it has been around long enough that we have not been able to trace its origin or the time when it was first heard. It appears to date before the original legislative campaign.
I have tended to ignore that story over the years for the reason that I didn't view it as credible--against a very positive election result in a national campaign, I just didn't believe there would be a sufficient incentive to maintain the cover up.
However as I have learned more about the actual underlying events, my views have to some degree shifted.
For one thing, his father was under an Islamic Death Edict which might well have included his father's male heirs. That Death Edict was ultimately the subject of action in which his father was assassinated. And the original cover up appears to originate in his father's objective to protect the son from the consequences of the threat and is consistent with that effort.
But another significant element of the objective has appeared.
His mother is of a different race than his father. Her personal and ethnic origin has been in continuing conflict with those of his father for several generations.
She was a very young single woman--19 at the time of his conception; 19 or 20 at the date of his birth. A member of a large family who were prominent in public Christian and political communities. She had a developing professional career of her own in which she has continued to prosper throughout the years with a fine reputation.
Although there is no way to prove it as yet, I infer from the limited factual background we know about that she did not tell her family of the birth. There is a gap in her professional career between the time it would have been apparent that she was pregnant and about three weeks after the probable birth date.
The birth appears to have occurred at some significant distance from any geographical location where she or her family or professional associates were active.
At this point, in my view, the political consequences of disclosure offer both difficulty and opportunity. It appears to me that if Gingrich is in fact the nominee, he is focusing on the underlying departure of Zero's policies from the foundational principles on which America was founded. Gingrich is now talking about vague distinctions that may result from knowledge of Zero's heritage which implies to me that his campaign may have penetrated the legend.
Zero's primary political exposure is that he is a complete fraud. Nothing you think you know about him is true. He is Anti-American; he is a historical Anti-American, Anti-Free Enterprise, Anti-American culture, Anti-Constitutional governance, Liberal Ends Justifies the Means politician.
That is a delicate political case to make. His position with respect to cover up of his origins is sympathetic--his parents were just attempting to protect him from adverse conditions that might have threatened him.
If Zero were a conservative; pro Constitution; pro-free enterprise candidate; we would welcome him with open arms. No one here would care who is father and mother were nor what their historical political activity involved.
So if the political objective is to be achieved, likely this is going to involve a challenging effort.
Dates?
You know, G, I actually missed the whole “Bill’s a bastard” issue. Where was I? Dang.
0bama Exposer's comment:
"From what I am hearing now is that 0bama is trying to set it up for some kind of mis-trial type appeal where he can claim he got incompetent representation by Jablonski for the ballot hearing? - He could then attempt to get another judge of their liking to hold the hearing in front of?"
We have seen images of the Stanley Ann Dunham - Barack Obama (Sr.) Hawaii court divorce case file here before, so there was a legal - unconcontested - divorce granted to SAD. (Judging by the numbering of the documents, there was at least one document missing from the file, which some speculated to have been BHO II's BC.)
When I first saw that, I was under the impression that one has to assert that there was a past legal marriage as a requirement to filing a divorce case. But a few folks here said that was not necessarily true. Still seems odd to me that there could be a divorce without a previous marriage.
As to the purported campaign flyer shown in the first post of this thread, it's obvious that some facts there are inconsistent with Obama's "Dreams from My Father." Obviously both cannot be true with respect to, e.g., Obama's mother's marital status at his birth and the state where Obama was raised. When it comes to Zero's past, there are few verifiable facts. There are still important mysteries to be definitely solved.
Facebook isn't exactly the Internet site for the most reliable information, from what I've heard.
And "Dreams from My Father" isn't necessarily truthful either.
So take both sources accordingly and realize that it may take more time to solve these mysteries convincingly. Let's hope that the time for resolution of these questions will come sooner rather than later.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.